Education and Training in Forensic Anthropology

IF 0.6 4区 经济学 Q4 BUSINESS, FINANCE Finanzarchiv Pub Date : 2020-05-28 DOI:10.5744/fa.2020.1013
Nicholas V. Passalacqua, M. Pilloud
{"title":"Education and Training in Forensic Anthropology","authors":"Nicholas V. Passalacqua, M. Pilloud","doi":"10.5744/fa.2020.1013","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The qualifications for a discipline are composed of the education and/or training requirements considered necessary to provide individuals with adequate knowledge to perform discipline-related tasks, including certification or licensing (Passalacqua & Pilloud 2018). Currently there are few available guidelines and no standards for the qualifications of a forensic anthropologist. To examine the qualifications of current practicing forensic anthropologists and to generate consensus-based criteria for the development of standards for qualifications for forensic anthropology, the authors generated an electronic survey. Results demonstrate that the qualifications of practicing forensic anthropologists are varied and do not always align with the qualifications currently outlined by the Scientific Working Group for Forensic Anthropology or the American Board of Forensic Anthropology. These findings do not mean these individuals are unqualified to practice forensic anthropology, but rather that there is currently little oversight or assistance for those individuals who do not fit the current models of perceived qualification, and no means of determining who does or does not have the adequate knowledge to perform forensic anthropological analyses. As forensic anthropology grows as a discipline, the standardization of qualifications will become increasingly important, both in terms of setting requirements for education and training and for the certification of practitioners. Further, there need to be clearer standards for education and training, which are currently lacking in the discipline.","PeriodicalId":45063,"journal":{"name":"Finanzarchiv","volume":"17 1","pages":"65-74"},"PeriodicalIF":0.6000,"publicationDate":"2020-05-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"15","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Finanzarchiv","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5744/fa.2020.1013","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"BUSINESS, FINANCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 15

Abstract

The qualifications for a discipline are composed of the education and/or training requirements considered necessary to provide individuals with adequate knowledge to perform discipline-related tasks, including certification or licensing (Passalacqua & Pilloud 2018). Currently there are few available guidelines and no standards for the qualifications of a forensic anthropologist. To examine the qualifications of current practicing forensic anthropologists and to generate consensus-based criteria for the development of standards for qualifications for forensic anthropology, the authors generated an electronic survey. Results demonstrate that the qualifications of practicing forensic anthropologists are varied and do not always align with the qualifications currently outlined by the Scientific Working Group for Forensic Anthropology or the American Board of Forensic Anthropology. These findings do not mean these individuals are unqualified to practice forensic anthropology, but rather that there is currently little oversight or assistance for those individuals who do not fit the current models of perceived qualification, and no means of determining who does or does not have the adequate knowledge to perform forensic anthropological analyses. As forensic anthropology grows as a discipline, the standardization of qualifications will become increasingly important, both in terms of setting requirements for education and training and for the certification of practitioners. Further, there need to be clearer standards for education and training, which are currently lacking in the discipline.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
法医人类学的教育和培训
一个学科的资格由教育和/或培训要求组成,这些要求被认为是必要的,为个人提供足够的知识来执行与学科相关的任务,包括认证或许可(Passalacqua & Pilloud 2018)。目前很少有可用的指导方针,也没有法医人类学家资格的标准。为了检查当前执业法医人类学家的资格,并为制定法医人类学资格标准产生基于共识的标准,作者进行了一项电子调查。结果表明,执业法医人类学家的资格是多种多样的,并不总是与法医人类学科学工作组或美国法医人类学委员会目前概述的资格一致。这些发现并不意味着这些人没有资格从事法医人类学,而是目前对那些不符合当前公认资格模式的人几乎没有监督或帮助,也没有办法确定谁有或没有足够的知识来进行法医人类学分析。随着法医人类学作为一门学科的发展,资格的标准化将变得越来越重要,无论是在教育和培训的设定要求方面,还是在从业人员的认证方面。此外,需要有更明确的教育和培训标准,这是目前该学科缺乏的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Finanzarchiv
Finanzarchiv Multiple-
CiteScore
0.80
自引率
20.00%
发文量
7
期刊最新文献
Plurality Rule, Majority Principle and Indeterminacy in German Elections Tax Competition and Leviathan with Decentralized Leadership Homeowner Subsidies and Suburban Living: Empirical Evidence from a Subsidy Repeal The Effect of an Employment Subsidy in Persistent Stagnation Improving Public Good Supply and Income Equality: Facing a Potential Trade-Off
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1