COMPARISON OF IMAGE ENHANCEMENT TECHNIQUES FOR RAPID PROCESSING OF POST FLOOD IMAGES

M. Harichandana, V. Sowmya, V. Sajithvariyar, R. Sivanpillai
{"title":"COMPARISON OF IMAGE ENHANCEMENT TECHNIQUES FOR RAPID PROCESSING OF POST FLOOD IMAGES","authors":"M. Harichandana, V. Sowmya, V. Sajithvariyar, R. Sivanpillai","doi":"10.5194/isprs-archives-xliv-m-2-2020-45-2020","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract. Satellite images are widely used for assessing the areal extent of flooded areas. However, presence of clouds and shadow limit the utility of these images. Numerous digital algorithms are available for enhancing such images and highlighting areas of interest. These algorithms range from simple to complex, and the time required to process these images also varies considerably. For disaster response, it is important to select an algorithm that can enhance the quality of the images in relatively short time. This study compared the relative performance of five traditional (Histogram Equalization, Local Histogram Equalization, Contrast Limited Adaptive Histogram Equalization, Gamma Correction, and Linear Contrast Stretch) algorithms for enhancing post-flood satellite images. Flood images with different levels of clouds and shadows were enhanced and output generated were evaluated in terms of processing time and quality as measured by Blind/Reference less Image Spatial Quality Evaluator (BRISQUE), a no-reference image quality metric. Findings from this study will provide valuable information to image analysts for selecting a suitable algorithm for rapidly processing post-flood satellite images.","PeriodicalId":14757,"journal":{"name":"ISPRS - International Archives of the Photogrammetry, Remote Sensing and Spatial Information Sciences","volume":"119 1","pages":"45-50"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-11-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ISPRS - International Archives of the Photogrammetry, Remote Sensing and Spatial Information Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5194/isprs-archives-xliv-m-2-2020-45-2020","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

Abstract

Abstract. Satellite images are widely used for assessing the areal extent of flooded areas. However, presence of clouds and shadow limit the utility of these images. Numerous digital algorithms are available for enhancing such images and highlighting areas of interest. These algorithms range from simple to complex, and the time required to process these images also varies considerably. For disaster response, it is important to select an algorithm that can enhance the quality of the images in relatively short time. This study compared the relative performance of five traditional (Histogram Equalization, Local Histogram Equalization, Contrast Limited Adaptive Histogram Equalization, Gamma Correction, and Linear Contrast Stretch) algorithms for enhancing post-flood satellite images. Flood images with different levels of clouds and shadows were enhanced and output generated were evaluated in terms of processing time and quality as measured by Blind/Reference less Image Spatial Quality Evaluator (BRISQUE), a no-reference image quality metric. Findings from this study will provide valuable information to image analysts for selecting a suitable algorithm for rapidly processing post-flood satellite images.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
洪水后图像快速处理的图像增强技术比较
摘要卫星图像被广泛用于评估洪水地区的面积范围。然而,云层和阴影的存在限制了这些图像的效用。许多数字算法可用于增强这些图像和突出感兴趣的区域。这些算法从简单到复杂,处理这些图像所需的时间也有很大差异。对于灾害响应,选择一种能在较短时间内提高图像质量的算法是很重要的。本研究比较了五种传统(直方图均衡化、局部直方图均衡化、对比度有限自适应直方图均衡化、伽玛校正和线性对比度拉伸)算法在增强洪水后卫星图像方面的相对性能。对具有不同云层和阴影水平的洪水图像进行增强,并根据处理时间和质量对生成的输出进行评估,这是由盲/无参考图像空间质量评估器(BRISQUE)测量的,这是一种无参考图像质量度量。本研究结果将为图像分析人员选择合适的算法快速处理洪水后卫星图像提供有价值的信息。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
A NOVEL GREEDY GENETIC ALGORITHM TO SOLVE COMBINATORIAL OPTIMIZATION PROBLEM POST-EARTHQUAKE 3D BUILDING MODEL (LOD2) GENERATION FROM UAS IMAGERY: THE CASE OF VRISA TRADITIONAL SETTLEMENT, LESVOS, GREECE DECISIONAL TREE MODELS FOR LAND COVER MAPPING AND CHANGE DETECTION BASED ON PHENOLOGICAL BEHAVIORS. APPLICATION CASE: LOCALIZATION OF NON-FULLY-EXPLOITED AGRICULTURAL SURFACES IN THE EASTERN PART OF THE HAOUZ PLAIN IN THE SEMI-ARID CENTRAL MOROCCO NATIONAL SMART CITIES STRATEGY AND ACTION PLAN: THE TURKEY’S SMART CITIES APPROACH EXPLOITATION OF THE DOMESTIC WASTEWATER TREATMENT PLANT BY ACTIVATED SLUDGE IN THE AIRPORT AREA OF THE CITY BEN SLIMANE (MOROCCO)
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1