Análisis de Colisión de Principios y Confianza Legítima Frente al Derecho Público

IF 0.2 Q4 ECONOMICS SaberEs Pub Date : 2020-08-18 DOI:10.25213/1794-4384/1302.0014
Iván Rodríguez-Lara, Luisa Tamayo-Álvarez, Kathy Valencia-Peluf
{"title":"Análisis de Colisión de Principios y Confianza Legítima Frente al Derecho Público","authors":"Iván Rodríguez-Lara, Luisa Tamayo-Álvarez, Kathy Valencia-Peluf","doi":"10.25213/1794-4384/1302.0014","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The purpose of this work is to explain the jurispru dential guidelines for the collision of the principles of legitimate expectations and space, describing how public space is exclusive to the principle of legitimate expectations, conducting a comprehensive study of the jurisprudence 66 Autor para correspondencia: correo electrónico ivoro2010@gmail.com © 2020 Fundación Universitaria Antonio de Arévalo – UNITECNAR. Este es un artículo bajo la licencia CC BY-NC-ND (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by nc-nd/4.0/) developed by Colombian Constitutional Court where specifically the two variables under study of this project (Right to work vs. the public space and in turn the study of the Theory of Principles proposed by Robert Alexis and as constitutional judges in his jurisprudence applied the weighting of principles to resolve this collision between these two principles enshrined in our Political Charter; revision of lower – ranking legal order (Codes, Colombian Laws) in turn, defining the theory of collision of principles, legitimate trust, public space, the right of work and work under the condition of informality.","PeriodicalId":40568,"journal":{"name":"SaberEs","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.2000,"publicationDate":"2020-08-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"SaberEs","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.25213/1794-4384/1302.0014","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"ECONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The purpose of this work is to explain the jurispru dential guidelines for the collision of the principles of legitimate expectations and space, describing how public space is exclusive to the principle of legitimate expectations, conducting a comprehensive study of the jurisprudence 66 Autor para correspondencia: correo electrónico ivoro2010@gmail.com © 2020 Fundación Universitaria Antonio de Arévalo – UNITECNAR. Este es un artículo bajo la licencia CC BY-NC-ND (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by nc-nd/4.0/) developed by Colombian Constitutional Court where specifically the two variables under study of this project (Right to work vs. the public space and in turn the study of the Theory of Principles proposed by Robert Alexis and as constitutional judges in his jurisprudence applied the weighting of principles to resolve this collision between these two principles enshrined in our Political Charter; revision of lower – ranking legal order (Codes, Colombian Laws) in turn, defining the theory of collision of principles, legitimate trust, public space, the right of work and work under the condition of informality.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
公法下原则与合法期望的冲突分析
这项工作的目的是解释合法期望原则与空间冲突的法理指导方针,描述公共空间如何专属于合法期望原则,并对法理进行全面研究66 Autor para correspondencia: correo electrónico ivoro2010@gmail.com©2020 Fundación Universitaria Antonio de aracvalo - UNITECNAR。Este es un artículo bajo la licencia CC by - nc-nd (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by nc-nd/4.0/)由哥伦比亚宪法法院开发,具体来说,该项目研究的两个变量(工作权与公共空间),以及反过来对罗伯特·亚历克西斯提出的原则理论的研究,作为宪法法官,在他的法理学中应用原则权重来解决我们政治宪章中所载的这两个原则之间的冲突;依次修订下级法律秩序(法典、哥伦比亚法律),界定原则碰撞理论、合法信任理论、公共空间理论、工作权利理论和非正式条件下的工作理论。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
SaberEs
SaberEs ECONOMICS-
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
34 weeks
期刊最新文献
ÁREAS NATURALES EN ZONAS COSTERAS, ESPACIOS EN RIESGO POR DISPOSICIÓN FINAL DE RESIDUOS SÓLIDOS DE LA COMUNIDAD DE GOBEA LA AUTORÍA MEDIATA EN EL DERECHO PENAL PANAMEÑO DESAFÍOS LINGÜÍSTICOS EN LA COMUNICACIÓN ORAL DESDE CONTEXTOS GLOBALES DE SIGNIFICADOS PROPUESTA DE UN MODELO DE IDENTIDAD Y ÉTICA DIRIGIDO AL ADMINISTRADOR DE EMPRESAS, PARA EL MEJORAMIENTO CONTÍNUO DE LA CALIDAD TOTAL Y LA PRODUCTIVIDAD LOS ODS Y DERECHOS HUMANOS EN LA AGENDA 2030 UNA REVISIÓN DOCUMENTAL DE LOS TEMAS DE TURISMO E INCLUSIÓN LGBT DE PANAMÁ
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1