Assessment of In Vitro Probiotic Potential of Lactic Acid Bacteria

Mital R. Kathiriya, S. Hati, J. Prajapati, Y. Vekariya
{"title":"Assessment of In Vitro Probiotic Potential of Lactic Acid Bacteria","authors":"Mital R. Kathiriya, S. Hati, J. Prajapati, Y. Vekariya","doi":"10.37591/RRJODST.V5I1.487","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract Probiotic potential of fermented milks isolates Lactobacillus rhamnosus NS6, Streptococcus thermophilus MD2 and Streptococcus thermophilus MD8 were carried out by performing various in vitro tests. MD2 and MD8 were able to survive at pH 2 and 3 in broth, while NS6 was found to be pH sensitive and could not survive at pH 2, but maintained its viability at 3 pH. All the cultures were able to survive at 0.5 % (w/v) oxgall (bile) concentration in broth. NS6 was most resistant to bile than rest isolates. They were susceptible to ampicilin, azithromycin, tetracycline, gentamycin and erythromycin while these strains were resistant to nalidixic acid, oxacilin, colistin and kanamycin. Cell supernatant of NS6 showed a higher antimicrobial activity i.e., 24 mm zone against E. coli and S. aureus; 16 mm zone against B. cereus and S. typhi and neutralization of cell supernatant showed significant reduction in antimicrobial activity. All the three strains were hydrophobic to both, xylene and n-hexadecan. The mean percentage hydrophobicity was higher to xylene than n-hexadecanfor all the strains. Cell-auto-aggregation was found to be rising during 5 h of incubation for cultures. They were able to co-aggregate with B. cereus, S, typhi, E. coli and S. aureus (indicators). None of the culture could hydrolyze sodium taurocholate (bile) while they deconjugated sodium taurocholate to release free cholic acid. NS6 gave maximum bile deconjugation ability (364 µg/ml). Similarly, in case of cholesterol reduction and antioxidative activity (ABTS method), NS6 was more potent than others. Keywords: Lactobacillus rhamnosus, Streptococcus thermophilus, lactic acid bacteria, probiotics, bile Cite this Article M.R. Kathiriya, S. Hati, J.B. Prajapati et al. Assessment of In Vitro Probiotic Potential of Lactic Acid Bacteria. Research & Reviews: Journal of Dairy Science and Technology. 2016: 5(1):  17–30p.","PeriodicalId":15409,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Dairy Science and Technology","volume":"2 1","pages":"17-30"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-04-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"6","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Dairy Science and Technology","FirstCategoryId":"1087","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.37591/RRJODST.V5I1.487","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 6

Abstract

Abstract Probiotic potential of fermented milks isolates Lactobacillus rhamnosus NS6, Streptococcus thermophilus MD2 and Streptococcus thermophilus MD8 were carried out by performing various in vitro tests. MD2 and MD8 were able to survive at pH 2 and 3 in broth, while NS6 was found to be pH sensitive and could not survive at pH 2, but maintained its viability at 3 pH. All the cultures were able to survive at 0.5 % (w/v) oxgall (bile) concentration in broth. NS6 was most resistant to bile than rest isolates. They were susceptible to ampicilin, azithromycin, tetracycline, gentamycin and erythromycin while these strains were resistant to nalidixic acid, oxacilin, colistin and kanamycin. Cell supernatant of NS6 showed a higher antimicrobial activity i.e., 24 mm zone against E. coli and S. aureus; 16 mm zone against B. cereus and S. typhi and neutralization of cell supernatant showed significant reduction in antimicrobial activity. All the three strains were hydrophobic to both, xylene and n-hexadecan. The mean percentage hydrophobicity was higher to xylene than n-hexadecanfor all the strains. Cell-auto-aggregation was found to be rising during 5 h of incubation for cultures. They were able to co-aggregate with B. cereus, S, typhi, E. coli and S. aureus (indicators). None of the culture could hydrolyze sodium taurocholate (bile) while they deconjugated sodium taurocholate to release free cholic acid. NS6 gave maximum bile deconjugation ability (364 µg/ml). Similarly, in case of cholesterol reduction and antioxidative activity (ABTS method), NS6 was more potent than others. Keywords: Lactobacillus rhamnosus, Streptococcus thermophilus, lactic acid bacteria, probiotics, bile Cite this Article M.R. Kathiriya, S. Hati, J.B. Prajapati et al. Assessment of In Vitro Probiotic Potential of Lactic Acid Bacteria. Research & Reviews: Journal of Dairy Science and Technology. 2016: 5(1):  17–30p.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
乳酸菌体外益生菌潜力的评价
摘要通过各种体外实验,研究了发酵乳分离物鼠李糖乳杆菌NS6、嗜热链球菌MD2和嗜热链球菌MD8的益生菌潜力。MD2和MD8在pH为2和3的培养液中均能存活,而NS6对pH敏感,在pH为2的培养液中不能存活,但在pH为3的培养液中仍能存活。所有培养物在0.5% (w/v)的氧化胆(胆汁)培养液中均能存活。NS6对胆汁的耐药程度高于其余分离株。对氨苄西林、阿奇霉素、四环素、庆大霉素和红霉素敏感,对萘啶酸、恶西林、粘菌素和卡那霉素耐药。NS6细胞上清液对大肠杆菌和金黄色葡萄球菌具有较高的抑菌活性(24 mm区);16 mm区对蜡样芽孢杆菌和斑疹伤寒链球菌的抑菌活性显著降低。3株菌株对二甲苯和正十六烷均有疏水性。所有菌株对二甲苯的平均疏水性百分比均高于正十六烷。在培养5小时的培养过程中发现细胞自身聚集增加。它们能够与蜡样芽孢杆菌、S、伤寒杆菌、大肠杆菌和金黄色葡萄球菌(指标)共聚集。没有一种培养物能水解牛磺酸胆酸钠(胆汁),但它们能解牛磺酸胆酸钠释放游离胆酸。NS6具有最大的胆汁解结能力(364µg/ml)。同样,在降低胆固醇和抗氧化活性(ABTS法)的情况下,NS6比其他药物更有效。关键词:鼠李糖乳杆菌,嗜热链球菌,乳酸菌,益生菌,胆汁乳酸菌体外益生菌潜力的评价。研究综述:乳品科技,2016,5(1):17-30p。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Composition and Therapeutic Applications of Goat Milk and Colostrum Comparative Study on Chemical Composition and Mineral Contents of Milk at Different stages of Lactation in Murrah Buffalo Study and Analysis of Different Milk Samples of Rajkot Region to Identify Adulterants Study and Detection of Different Adulteration in Milk: A Comprehensive Review Evaluation of Physiochemical, Functional and Sensory Properties of Ice-Cream Incorporated with Tomato Juice
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1