Archaeology and archaeometallurgy in Limpopo Province, South Africa: case studies of the Early Iron Age sites of Mutoti and Thomo

IF 1.1 2区 历史学 0 ARCHAEOLOGY Azania-Archaeological Research in Africa Pub Date : 2021-03-17 DOI:10.1080/0067270X.2021.1900638
Eric Maṱhoho
{"title":"Archaeology and archaeometallurgy in Limpopo Province, South Africa: case studies of the Early Iron Age sites of Mutoti and Thomo","authors":"Eric Maṱhoho","doi":"10.1080/0067270X.2021.1900638","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Decades of archaeological research have established the chronology of the history of culture by farmers in northern South Africa from the beginning of the first millennium AD to the recent past. This thesis sought to explore the archaeology and archaeometallurgy of the early inhabitants of the Lowveld region. Rigorous methodological and theoretical approaches, which include ethnohistorical, archaeological and archaeometallurgical studies, were employed to acquire the relevant information required to address research problems. Ceramic typology and settlement pattern studies were used to establish the culture-history needed to contextualise Iron Age sites, while Optical Microscopy, X-Ray Fluorescence analysis (XRF) and Scanning ElectronMicroscopy (SEM) were used to investigate the metallurgical remains from them in order to understand metal production technology. Both Mutoti and Thomo share several similarities, namely, a location near perennial streams, the presence of metal-production and a predominance of pottery types marked by short and long neck vessels dominated by comb stamping, incision and punctate decorations on the rim, neck and shoulder of the vessels. Ceramic tradition analysis revealed that both Mutoti and Thomo combine ceramic designs and attributes that appeared in the region near the beginning of the first millennium AD, that is the Urewe and Kalundu traditions. The sites’ radiocarbon-based chronology suggests that they were occupied contemporaneously and that they date to cal. AD 650–850. Analysis of the distribution of material objects across Mutoti revealed active participation in both local (soapstone) and international trade networks (Islamic ceramics). Evidence of craft activities includes metal production, eggshell bead manufacture and cloth production. Metal production was regarded as a signature of power and authority in the Iron Age and more research may strengthen this observation at these sites.","PeriodicalId":45689,"journal":{"name":"Azania-Archaeological Research in Africa","volume":"16 1","pages":"280 - 280"},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2021-03-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Azania-Archaeological Research in Africa","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/0067270X.2021.1900638","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"历史学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"ARCHAEOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Decades of archaeological research have established the chronology of the history of culture by farmers in northern South Africa from the beginning of the first millennium AD to the recent past. This thesis sought to explore the archaeology and archaeometallurgy of the early inhabitants of the Lowveld region. Rigorous methodological and theoretical approaches, which include ethnohistorical, archaeological and archaeometallurgical studies, were employed to acquire the relevant information required to address research problems. Ceramic typology and settlement pattern studies were used to establish the culture-history needed to contextualise Iron Age sites, while Optical Microscopy, X-Ray Fluorescence analysis (XRF) and Scanning ElectronMicroscopy (SEM) were used to investigate the metallurgical remains from them in order to understand metal production technology. Both Mutoti and Thomo share several similarities, namely, a location near perennial streams, the presence of metal-production and a predominance of pottery types marked by short and long neck vessels dominated by comb stamping, incision and punctate decorations on the rim, neck and shoulder of the vessels. Ceramic tradition analysis revealed that both Mutoti and Thomo combine ceramic designs and attributes that appeared in the region near the beginning of the first millennium AD, that is the Urewe and Kalundu traditions. The sites’ radiocarbon-based chronology suggests that they were occupied contemporaneously and that they date to cal. AD 650–850. Analysis of the distribution of material objects across Mutoti revealed active participation in both local (soapstone) and international trade networks (Islamic ceramics). Evidence of craft activities includes metal production, eggshell bead manufacture and cloth production. Metal production was regarded as a signature of power and authority in the Iron Age and more research may strengthen this observation at these sites.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
南非林波波省的考古学和考古冶金学:Mutoti和Thomo早期铁器时代遗址的案例研究
几十年的考古研究已经确定了南非北部农民从公元一千年开始到最近的文化史年表。本文试图探讨低地地区早期居民的考古学和考古冶金学。采用了严谨的方法和理论方法,包括民族历史、考古和考古冶金学研究,以获取解决研究问题所需的相关信息。陶瓷类型学和聚落模式研究用于建立铁器时代遗址背景所需的文化历史,而光学显微镜、x射线荧光分析(XRF)和扫描电子显微镜(SEM)用于研究它们的冶金遗迹,以了解金属生产技术。Mutoti和Thomo都有几个相似之处,即,地点靠近常年溪流,金属制品的存在,以及以短颈和长颈容器为主的陶器类型,这些容器的边缘、颈部和肩部都有梳状冲压、切口和点状装饰。陶瓷传统分析显示,Mutoti和Thomo都结合了陶瓷设计和特征,这些特征出现在公元第一个千年开始的地区,即Urewe和Kalundu传统。这些遗址的放射性碳年表表明,它们是在同一时期被占领的,可以追溯到公元650-850年。对整个Mutoti的实物分布的分析表明,当地(肥皂石)和国际贸易网络(伊斯兰陶瓷)都积极参与。手工艺活动的证据包括金属生产、蛋壳珠制造和布料生产。在铁器时代,金属生产被认为是权力和权威的标志,更多的研究可能会加强这些遗址的观察。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.40
自引率
9.10%
发文量
18
期刊最新文献
Kasongo-Tongoni: a nineteenth-century caravan town in Maniema, Democratic Republic of Congo Pleistocene archaeology and environments of the Free State, South Africa PhD Abstract Adornment deposits: a study of bead and jewellery remains from Late Antiquity tombs in the Red Sea port of Berenike Paul Sinclair (1949–2023) — In memoriam
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1