FALA framework: A learning progression for novice teachers’ use of formative assessment

Carolyn Mitten
{"title":"FALA framework: A learning progression for novice teachers’ use of formative assessment","authors":"Carolyn Mitten","doi":"10.51272/PMENA.42.2020-396","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Formative assessment has been identified as one way that teachers can gather critical information about a student’s level of understanding in order to make informed instructional adaptations that meet the needs of all students (NCTM, 2000; Shepard et al., 2005). Over several decades, research has shown the potential of formative assessment to effectively improve student achievement (Black & Wiliam, 1998; Kingston & Nash, 2011). Despite its potential, issues in preparing teachers to implement formative assessment practices has kept its potential from being realized (Schoenfeld, 2015) and many teachers have limited understanding of its use (Shepard et al., 2005). In order to better understand how to prepare teachers to use formative assessment, a trajectory describing how teachers develop formative assessment knowledge and practice is needed. The Formative Assessment Levels of Appropriation (FALA) framework evolved from a larger qualitative research study on the evolution of formative assessment knowledge and practice of novice teachers from teacher preparation through their third year of teaching. Grounded in activity theory, the FALA framework describes the levels of appropriation (Grossman et al., 1998) for the five aspects of formative assessment defined by Black & Wiliam (2009). Table 1 provides an example of the framework for one aspect of formative assessment—clarifying intentions and criteria for success.","PeriodicalId":68089,"journal":{"name":"数学教学通讯","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-12-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"数学教学通讯","FirstCategoryId":"1089","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.51272/PMENA.42.2020-396","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Formative assessment has been identified as one way that teachers can gather critical information about a student’s level of understanding in order to make informed instructional adaptations that meet the needs of all students (NCTM, 2000; Shepard et al., 2005). Over several decades, research has shown the potential of formative assessment to effectively improve student achievement (Black & Wiliam, 1998; Kingston & Nash, 2011). Despite its potential, issues in preparing teachers to implement formative assessment practices has kept its potential from being realized (Schoenfeld, 2015) and many teachers have limited understanding of its use (Shepard et al., 2005). In order to better understand how to prepare teachers to use formative assessment, a trajectory describing how teachers develop formative assessment knowledge and practice is needed. The Formative Assessment Levels of Appropriation (FALA) framework evolved from a larger qualitative research study on the evolution of formative assessment knowledge and practice of novice teachers from teacher preparation through their third year of teaching. Grounded in activity theory, the FALA framework describes the levels of appropriation (Grossman et al., 1998) for the five aspects of formative assessment defined by Black & Wiliam (2009). Table 1 provides an example of the framework for one aspect of formative assessment—clarifying intentions and criteria for success.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
FALA框架:新手教师使用形成性评估的学习进展
形成性评估被认为是教师收集有关学生理解水平的关键信息的一种方式,以便做出符合所有学生需求的明智的教学调整(NCTM, 2000;Shepard et al., 2005)。几十年来,研究表明形成性评价有潜力有效地提高学生的成绩(Black & william, 1998;Kingston & Nash, 2011)。尽管它有潜力,但在准备教师实施形成性评估实践方面的问题使其潜力无法实现(Schoenfeld, 2015),许多教师对其使用的理解有限(Shepard et al., 2005)。为了更好地理解如何让教师准备好使用形成性评价,需要一个描述教师如何发展形成性评价知识和实践的轨迹。形成性评估拨款水平(FALA)框架是从一项更大规模的定性研究演变而来的,该研究是关于新手教师从教师准备到第三年教学的形成性评估知识和实践的演变。FALA框架以活动理论为基础,描述了Black & william(2009)定义的形成性评估的五个方面的挪用水平(Grossman et al., 1998)。表1提供了形成性评估的一个方面的框架的例子——澄清成功的意图和标准。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
22282
期刊最新文献
What makes a mathematics lesson interesting to students? Elementary teachers’ discourse about mathematical reasoning Two prospective middle school teachers reinvent combinatorial formulas: permutations and arrangements Report of a classroom experience for the development of distribution models / Experiencia en el aula para el desarrollo de modelos para el reparto Self-efficacy and the kernel of content knowledge
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1