Comparison of Top Round Steaks Cooked by Microwave-Convection, Forced-Air Convection and Conventional Ovens

Jennifer E. Payton, R. E. Baldwin
{"title":"Comparison of Top Round Steaks Cooked by Microwave-Convection, Forced-Air Convection and Conventional Ovens","authors":"Jennifer E. Payton, R. E. Baldwin","doi":"10.1080/16070658.1985.11720309","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"AbstractThis study compared microwave-convection, forced-air convection and conventional electric ovens as to time and energy requirements, uniformity of cooking, and effect on cooking losses, sensory characteristics, moisture, fat, thiamin and riboflavin content of top round beef steaks. Sensory evaluation indicated no significant difference in juiciness; tenderness, including number of chews; intensity of beef flavor; and external color of the steaks cooked by the three ovens. Also, moisture, fat, thiamin and riboflavin content of the meat did not differ among treatments. Total cooking losses and percentage evaporation were greater (P<0.05) for steaks cooked in the microwave-convection oven than for those cooked by the other two methods. Drip losses were greater (P<0.05) with the microwave-convection than with the forced-air convection method of cooking top round beef steaks. The least total cooking time was required for the microwave-convection oven and the most for the forced-air convection oven. On a...","PeriodicalId":76653,"journal":{"name":"The Journal of microwave power","volume":"26 1","pages":"255-259"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1985-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"10","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Journal of microwave power","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/16070658.1985.11720309","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 10

Abstract

AbstractThis study compared microwave-convection, forced-air convection and conventional electric ovens as to time and energy requirements, uniformity of cooking, and effect on cooking losses, sensory characteristics, moisture, fat, thiamin and riboflavin content of top round beef steaks. Sensory evaluation indicated no significant difference in juiciness; tenderness, including number of chews; intensity of beef flavor; and external color of the steaks cooked by the three ovens. Also, moisture, fat, thiamin and riboflavin content of the meat did not differ among treatments. Total cooking losses and percentage evaporation were greater (P<0.05) for steaks cooked in the microwave-convection oven than for those cooked by the other two methods. Drip losses were greater (P<0.05) with the microwave-convection than with the forced-air convection method of cooking top round beef steaks. The least total cooking time was required for the microwave-convection oven and the most for the forced-air convection oven. On a...
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
微波对流、强制空气对流和传统烤炉烤顶圆牛排的比较
摘要本研究比较了微波对流、强制空气对流和传统电烤箱对上圆牛排的时间和能量要求、蒸煮均匀性、蒸煮损失、感官特性、水分、脂肪、硫胺素和核黄素含量的影响。感官评价表明多汁性无显著差异;嫩度,包括咀嚼次数;牛肉风味强度;以及三台烤炉烤出的牛排的外观颜色。此外,肉的水分、脂肪、硫胺素和核黄素含量在不同处理之间没有差异。微波对流蒸煮牛排的总蒸煮损失和蒸发率显著高于其他两种蒸煮方式(P<0.05)。微波对流法蒸煮牛排的滴漏损失大于空气对流法蒸煮牛排的滴漏损失(P<0.05)。微波对流炉所需的总烹饪时间最少,强制空气对流炉所需的总烹饪时间最多。在一个…
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Network Analysis on Radio Frequency Prototype Industrial Applications Fusion Plasma Heating with High Power Microwave and Millimeter Wave Tubes Abstracts and Keys: 1985 The Physics of Plasma Wave Heating for Fusion Energy Biophysical and cellular effects of microwaves interacting with plant tissues
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1