Participation of populist radical right parties in coalition governments of Central and Eastern Europe: do national party systems matter?

IF 2 2区 社会学 Q1 AREA STUDIES East European Politics Pub Date : 2022-10-11 DOI:10.1080/21599165.2022.2132478
Ilia Viatkin
{"title":"Participation of populist radical right parties in coalition governments of Central and Eastern Europe: do national party systems matter?","authors":"Ilia Viatkin","doi":"10.1080/21599165.2022.2132478","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT Explanations of how populist radical right parties (PRRPs) get into government, especially in Central and Eastern Europe (CEE), have so far received limited scholarly attention. This article explores the conditions of PRRPs’ cabinet inclusion in CEE from the perspective of national party systems by examining 34 instances of coalition government formation in 11 CEE states during 2000–2019 using fuzzy-set qualitative comparative analysis (fsQCA). The inferred causal paths demonstrate that PRRPs join coalition cabinets in party systems, in which they either perform the role of “radical but necessary partners” or serve as the “like-minded juniors” for formateur parties.","PeriodicalId":46570,"journal":{"name":"East European Politics","volume":"114 1","pages":"414 - 433"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-10-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"East European Politics","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/21599165.2022.2132478","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"AREA STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

ABSTRACT Explanations of how populist radical right parties (PRRPs) get into government, especially in Central and Eastern Europe (CEE), have so far received limited scholarly attention. This article explores the conditions of PRRPs’ cabinet inclusion in CEE from the perspective of national party systems by examining 34 instances of coalition government formation in 11 CEE states during 2000–2019 using fuzzy-set qualitative comparative analysis (fsQCA). The inferred causal paths demonstrate that PRRPs join coalition cabinets in party systems, in which they either perform the role of “radical but necessary partners” or serve as the “like-minded juniors” for formateur parties.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
民粹主义激进右翼政党参与中欧和东欧联合政府:国家政党制度重要吗?
关于民粹主义极右翼政党(prrp)如何进入政府的解释,特别是在中欧和东欧(CEE),迄今为止受到的学术关注有限。本文采用模糊集定性比较分析(fsQCA)方法,从国家政党制度的角度考察了中东欧11个国家2000-2019年34个联合政府组建案例,探讨了中东欧地区prrp组阁的条件。推断出的因果路径表明,prrp在政党体系中加入联合内阁,在其中他们要么扮演“激进但必要的伙伴”的角色,要么充当创始政党“志同道合的初级成员”。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
East European Politics
East European Politics POLITICAL SCIENCE-
CiteScore
7.00
自引率
9.40%
发文量
37
期刊最新文献
Are consociations bad for women? Assessing the effectiveness of gender quotas in Bosnia and Herzegovina and North Macedonia Polish martial law of 1981 as seen on Facebook. A comparative analysis between the Facebook posts of political parties Czech political parties and the war in Ukraine: continuity of foreign policy stances Comparing public attitudes towards internal and external EU sanctions: the role of populism, trust and Euroscepticism Patterns of international organizations’ engagement in reform and policy making in the post-Soviet space
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1