Impact mechanisms of granular flow against curved barriers

IF 1.5 4区 工程技术 Q3 ENGINEERING, GEOLOGICAL Geotechnique Letters Pub Date : 2017-12-01 DOI:10.1680/JGELE.17.00068
C. Choi, Yi-fei Cui, L. H. D.Liu, C. Ng, S. Lourenço
{"title":"Impact mechanisms of granular flow against curved barriers","authors":"C. Choi, Yi-fei Cui, L. H. D.Liu, C. Ng, S. Lourenço","doi":"10.1680/JGELE.17.00068","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Curved seawalls remain one of the most widely adopted coastal-protection measure. A curved face redirects flow momentum and prevents waves from overtopping. Likewise, the use of curvatures for landslide barriers merits investigation given their potential engineering value in reducing the runup height and impact force of geophysical flows. In this study, flume tests were carried out to explore the impact mechanism of dry granular flow against a curved barrier. The impact force, runup height and regime transition path of granular flow for both vertical and curved barriers were compared under different Froude conditions (Fr = 4.7 and 6.4). Results reveal that in comparison to a vertical barrier, curved barriers reduce the runup height and elongate the duration of impact by up to 17% and 15%, respectively. For curved barriers, the impact force is reduced by up to 25% for coarser granular flows. By contrast, the impact force does not exhibit a significant reduction for finer granular flows. Furthermore, result...","PeriodicalId":48920,"journal":{"name":"Geotechnique Letters","volume":"114 1","pages":"330-338"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2017-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"20","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Geotechnique Letters","FirstCategoryId":"89","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1680/JGELE.17.00068","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, GEOLOGICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 20

Abstract

Curved seawalls remain one of the most widely adopted coastal-protection measure. A curved face redirects flow momentum and prevents waves from overtopping. Likewise, the use of curvatures for landslide barriers merits investigation given their potential engineering value in reducing the runup height and impact force of geophysical flows. In this study, flume tests were carried out to explore the impact mechanism of dry granular flow against a curved barrier. The impact force, runup height and regime transition path of granular flow for both vertical and curved barriers were compared under different Froude conditions (Fr = 4.7 and 6.4). Results reveal that in comparison to a vertical barrier, curved barriers reduce the runup height and elongate the duration of impact by up to 17% and 15%, respectively. For curved barriers, the impact force is reduced by up to 25% for coarser granular flows. By contrast, the impact force does not exhibit a significant reduction for finer granular flows. Furthermore, result...
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
颗粒流对弯曲屏障的冲击机制
弯曲海堤仍然是最广泛采用的海岸保护措施之一。曲面重新引导水流动量,防止波浪溢出。同样,曲率对于滑坡屏障的使用值得研究,因为它们在降低地球物理流的上升高度和冲击力方面具有潜在的工程价值。本研究通过水槽试验来探讨干颗粒流对弯曲屏障的冲击机理。比较了不同弗鲁德条件(Fr = 4.7和6.4)下,垂直和弯曲障碍物对颗粒流的冲击力、上升高度和形态转变路径的影响。结果表明,与垂直屏障相比,弯曲屏障降低了上升高度,延长了冲击时间,分别高达17%和15%。对于弯曲的屏障,对于较粗的颗粒流,冲击力减少了25%。相比之下,对于更细的颗粒流,冲击力没有显着降低。此外,结果……
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Geotechnique Letters
Geotechnique Letters ENGINEERING, GEOLOGICAL-
CiteScore
4.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
42
期刊介绍: Géotechnique Letters provides a vehicle for the rapid international dissemination of the latest and most innovative geotechnical research and practice. As an online journal, it is aimed at publishing short papers, intending to foster the quick exchange of the latest advances and most current ideas without the delays imposed by printed journals, whilst still maintaining rigorous peer reviewing standards.
期刊最新文献
Small-strain, non-linear elastic Winkler model for uniaxial loading of suction caisson foundations A new grouting cable without core tube used for reinforcement of fractured rock mass Géotechnique Letters: Referees 2022 Award-winning paper in 2021 Auxiliary plastic potential approach in elastoplasticity for soils
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1