Performance Evaluation of DigiMesh and ZigBee Wireless Mesh Networks

A. Khalifeh, Haya Salah, S. Alouneh, Anwar Al-Assaf, Khalid A. Darabkh
{"title":"Performance Evaluation of DigiMesh and ZigBee Wireless Mesh Networks","authors":"A. Khalifeh, Haya Salah, S. Alouneh, Anwar Al-Assaf, Khalid A. Darabkh","doi":"10.1109/WISPNET.2018.8538620","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This paper presents an experimental evaluation of ZigBee and DigiMesh networks; a two well-known and widely used Wireless Mesh Networks architectures. The performance metrics used were the throughput, Round Trip Time, Received Signal Strength Indication, and Mesh Routing Recovery Time. The conducted experiments show that DigiMesh have better throughput than ZigBeee networks. However, the later outperforms DigiMesh based networks by having lower Round Trip Time, higher Received Signal Strength Indication, and it needs less time to recover from a failure node. These features make ZigBee a better choice for applications that require less delay and need longer communication range, while DigiMesh based networks are better used for networks with high throughput requirements.","PeriodicalId":6858,"journal":{"name":"2018 International Conference on Wireless Communications, Signal Processing and Networking (WiSPNET)","volume":"51 1","pages":"1-6"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-03-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"16","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2018 International Conference on Wireless Communications, Signal Processing and Networking (WiSPNET)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/WISPNET.2018.8538620","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 16

Abstract

This paper presents an experimental evaluation of ZigBee and DigiMesh networks; a two well-known and widely used Wireless Mesh Networks architectures. The performance metrics used were the throughput, Round Trip Time, Received Signal Strength Indication, and Mesh Routing Recovery Time. The conducted experiments show that DigiMesh have better throughput than ZigBeee networks. However, the later outperforms DigiMesh based networks by having lower Round Trip Time, higher Received Signal Strength Indication, and it needs less time to recover from a failure node. These features make ZigBee a better choice for applications that require less delay and need longer communication range, while DigiMesh based networks are better used for networks with high throughput requirements.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
DigiMesh和ZigBee无线网状网络的性能评估
本文对ZigBee和DigiMesh网络进行了实验评估;两种众所周知且广泛使用的无线Mesh网络体系结构。使用的性能指标是吞吐量、往返时间、接收信号强度指示和网状路由恢复时间。实验结果表明,DigiMesh具有比zigbee网络更好的吞吐量。然而,后者优于基于DigiMesh的网络,因为它具有更低的往返时间,更高的接收信号强度指示,并且需要更少的时间从故障节点恢复。这些特性使ZigBee成为对延迟要求更低、通信范围更长的应用的更好选择,而基于DigiMesh的网络则更适合高吞吐量要求的网络。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Deep Reinforcement Learning for the Capacitated Vehicle Routing Problem with Soft Time Window Integrated Interference Solutions Between 5G and Satellite Systems Modulation Recognition Method of MAPSK Signal Artificial Intelligence Routing Method in Wireless Sensor Network for Sewage Treatment Monitoring Electromagnetically Induced Transparency in a Coupled NV Spin-Mechanical Resonator System
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1