The Value of Suction Drainage for a Chronic Subdural Hematoma in Elderly Patients: A Retrospective Cohort study

M. AbdelFatah, Ibrahim Abdelmohsen, Sherif Bahaa, Mohamed Elwardany, Sameh Hefny
{"title":"The Value of Suction Drainage for a Chronic Subdural Hematoma in Elderly Patients: A Retrospective Cohort study","authors":"M. AbdelFatah, Ibrahim Abdelmohsen, Sherif Bahaa, Mohamed Elwardany, Sameh Hefny","doi":"10.21608/mjmu.2022.171412.1147","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: The use of suction in the subgaleal drainage system after the burr-hole evacuation of chronic subdural hematoma (CSDH) is still debatable. This study aimed to investigate the value of adding suction to the drainage system of CSDH in elderly patients. Methods: This cohort study retrospectively reviewed the data of the CSDH patients operated on at our university hospital in the last eight years. The inclusion criteria were elderly patients who underwent evacuation of a unilateral CSDH through two burr holes followed by placing a subgaleal drainage tube. Two hundred seventy-three consecutive patients met the inclusion criteria. Seventy-six patients (27.8%) received suction drainage. The comparison between groups with qualitative data was done using the chi-square test. The comparison between groups with quantitative data was done using the t-test. The statistical analyses were conducted using SPSS software version 21 (IBM Corp., Armonk, New York, USA). Results: There were no statistically significant differences between the suction and the nonsuction drainage groups regarding the hospitalization period, the postoperative seizures, or the recurrence rate. However, the postoperative pneumocephalus volume in the suction drainage group was significantly lower than in the non-suction drainage group. None of the patients developed acute subdural or intracerebral hemorrhage. Conclusions: Suction drainage did not add statistically significant value to the closed drainage system regarding the hospitalization period, postoperative seizures, or recurrence rate of the CSDH. A prospective controlled study is needed to increase the evidence for this finding.","PeriodicalId":18173,"journal":{"name":"Mansoura Veterinary Medical Journal","volume":"65 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-12-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Mansoura Veterinary Medical Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21608/mjmu.2022.171412.1147","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: The use of suction in the subgaleal drainage system after the burr-hole evacuation of chronic subdural hematoma (CSDH) is still debatable. This study aimed to investigate the value of adding suction to the drainage system of CSDH in elderly patients. Methods: This cohort study retrospectively reviewed the data of the CSDH patients operated on at our university hospital in the last eight years. The inclusion criteria were elderly patients who underwent evacuation of a unilateral CSDH through two burr holes followed by placing a subgaleal drainage tube. Two hundred seventy-three consecutive patients met the inclusion criteria. Seventy-six patients (27.8%) received suction drainage. The comparison between groups with qualitative data was done using the chi-square test. The comparison between groups with quantitative data was done using the t-test. The statistical analyses were conducted using SPSS software version 21 (IBM Corp., Armonk, New York, USA). Results: There were no statistically significant differences between the suction and the nonsuction drainage groups regarding the hospitalization period, the postoperative seizures, or the recurrence rate. However, the postoperative pneumocephalus volume in the suction drainage group was significantly lower than in the non-suction drainage group. None of the patients developed acute subdural or intracerebral hemorrhage. Conclusions: Suction drainage did not add statistically significant value to the closed drainage system regarding the hospitalization period, postoperative seizures, or recurrence rate of the CSDH. A prospective controlled study is needed to increase the evidence for this finding.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
老年慢性硬膜下血肿抽吸引流的价值:一项回顾性队列研究
背景:慢性硬膜下血肿(CSDH)钻孔引流后硬膜下引流系统中吸力的应用仍有争议。本研究旨在探讨老年CSDH患者在引流系统中增加吸力的价值。方法:回顾性分析我院近8年来收治的CSDH患者的资料。纳入标准是通过两个钻孔对单侧CSDH进行引流,随后置入galeal下引流管的老年患者。273例连续患者符合纳入标准。76例(27.8%)采用吸引引流。定性资料组间比较采用卡方检验。有定量资料的组间比较采用t检验。采用SPSS软件21版(IBM Corp., Armonk, New York, USA)进行统计分析。结果:抽吸组与非抽吸组住院时间、术后癫痫发作、复发率比较,差异均无统计学意义。然而,术后吸液引流组的肺水肿体积明显低于非吸液引流组。没有患者出现急性硬膜下出血或脑出血。结论:在CSDH的住院时间、术后癫痫发作、复发率方面,封闭引流系统与吸引引流没有统计学意义的增加。需要一项前瞻性对照研究来增加这一发现的证据。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Effectiveness of cleanup and dredging operations on some heavy metal residues in fish flesh from Manzala lake, Egypt EFFECTS OF DIFFERENT TYPES OF ENVIRONMENTAL ENRICHMENT ON BEHAVIOUR, PERFORMANCE, WELFARE, CARCASS CHARACTERISTICS AND LIPID PROFILE OF BROILER CHICKENS Evaluating and improving the beef quality of freshly dressed cattle carcasses at old – fashioned abattoirs of both Dakahlia and Damietta provinces. A descriptive study of the Female kestrel in northeast of Libya Effect of Pomegranate Peel Extract (PPE) on Diethylnitrosamine (DENA) and Carbon tetrachloride (CCL4) induced hepatocellular carcinoma in Rats.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1