Shareholder Say on Pay and CEO Compensation: Three Strikes and the Board is Out

Matthew Grosse, Stephen Kean, T. Scott
{"title":"Shareholder Say on Pay and CEO Compensation: Three Strikes and the Board is Out","authors":"Matthew Grosse, Stephen Kean, T. Scott","doi":"10.1111/acfi.12176","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"From 2011 in Australia, if over 25% of shareholders vote against a non-binding remuneration resolution, firms are awarded a ‘strike’. We examine 237 firms that receive a strike relative to matched firms, and find no association with any measure of CEO pay. However, we do find that strike firms have higher book-to-market and leverage ratios, suggesting that the remuneration vote is not used to target excessive pay. We also find that firms respond to a strike by decreasing the discretionary bonus component of CEO pay by 57.10% more than non-strike firms and increasing their remuneration disclosure by 10.95%.","PeriodicalId":23644,"journal":{"name":"Wiley-Blackwell: Journal of Business Finance & Accounting","volume":"157 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"42","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Wiley-Blackwell: Journal of Business Finance & Accounting","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/acfi.12176","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 42

Abstract

From 2011 in Australia, if over 25% of shareholders vote against a non-binding remuneration resolution, firms are awarded a ‘strike’. We examine 237 firms that receive a strike relative to matched firms, and find no association with any measure of CEO pay. However, we do find that strike firms have higher book-to-market and leverage ratios, suggesting that the remuneration vote is not used to target excessive pay. We also find that firms respond to a strike by decreasing the discretionary bonus component of CEO pay by 57.10% more than non-strike firms and increasing their remuneration disclosure by 10.95%.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
股东对薪酬和CEO薪酬的看法:三振出局
从2011年起,在澳大利亚,如果超过25%的股东投票反对一项不具约束力的薪酬决议,公司将被授予“罢工”。我们研究了237家遭受罢工的公司,发现罢工与CEO薪酬没有任何关系。然而,我们确实发现罢工公司的账面市值比和杠杆率更高,这表明薪酬投票并没有被用来针对过高的薪酬。我们还发现,企业对罢工的反应是,与非罢工企业相比,CEO薪酬中可自由支配的奖金部分减少了57.10%,薪酬披露增加了10.95%。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Sustainability of the Accounting and Finance Academic Profession: Students’ and Supervisors’ Views About the Phd Supervision Process Transforming Accounting Curricula to Enhance Integrative Learning IASB's Independence in the Due Process: An Examination of Interest Groups’ Influence on the Development of IFRS 9 Structural Holes and Hedge Fund Return Comovement: Evidence from Network‐Connected Stock Hedge Funds in China The Pricing of Accruals Quality in Credit Default Swap Spreads
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1