ADAS-CoG and mental deterioration battery: Different instruments for different aspects of cognitive decline in Alzheimer's disease

L. Serra, R. Perri, G. Carlesimo, L. Fadda, S. Lorusso, A. Padovani, C. Pettenati, Maia Vegliante, C. Caltagirone
{"title":"ADAS-CoG and mental deterioration battery: Different instruments for different aspects of cognitive decline in Alzheimer's disease","authors":"L. Serra, R. Perri, G. Carlesimo, L. Fadda, S. Lorusso, A. Padovani, C. Pettenati, Maia Vegliante, C. Caltagirone","doi":"10.1002/NRC.20032","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objective: Aim of this study was to compare ADAS-Cog and MDB, instruments usually used in cognitive assessment of AD patients, relative to: 1) diagnostic sensitivity for dementia of AD; 2) ability to rate the progression of cognitive decline and ability to detect the qualitative characteristics of cognitive decline. Material and methods: A sample of 54 AD patients was submitted to a cognitive assessment with both battery at time of study entry (T 0) and after 12 months (T 12). Results: This study showed: 1) a better diagnostic sensitivity of MDB respect to ADAS-Cog in diagnosing patients affected by mild to moderate levels of AD; 2) a better sensitivity of ADAS-Cog to follow the cognitive decline over a twelve-months period Conclusion: These results supports the use of the MDB in the screening phase of AD patients and of ADAS-Cog to follow the progression of cognitive decline over time.","PeriodicalId":19198,"journal":{"name":"Neuroscience Research Communications","volume":"10 1","pages":"184-192"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2004-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Neuroscience Research Communications","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/NRC.20032","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

Objective: Aim of this study was to compare ADAS-Cog and MDB, instruments usually used in cognitive assessment of AD patients, relative to: 1) diagnostic sensitivity for dementia of AD; 2) ability to rate the progression of cognitive decline and ability to detect the qualitative characteristics of cognitive decline. Material and methods: A sample of 54 AD patients was submitted to a cognitive assessment with both battery at time of study entry (T 0) and after 12 months (T 12). Results: This study showed: 1) a better diagnostic sensitivity of MDB respect to ADAS-Cog in diagnosing patients affected by mild to moderate levels of AD; 2) a better sensitivity of ADAS-Cog to follow the cognitive decline over a twelve-months period Conclusion: These results supports the use of the MDB in the screening phase of AD patients and of ADAS-Cog to follow the progression of cognitive decline over time.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
ADAS-CoG和精神退化电池:不同的仪器用于阿尔茨海默病认知能力下降的不同方面
目的:本研究的目的是比较ADAS-Cog和MDB这两种常用的AD患者认知评估工具在以下方面的差异:1)AD痴呆的诊断敏感性;2)评价认知衰退进展的能力和检测认知衰退定性特征的能力。材料和方法:54例AD患者在研究开始时(t0)和12个月后(t12)接受认知评估。结果:本研究表明:1)MDB相对于ADAS-Cog在诊断轻中度AD患者中具有更好的诊断敏感性;结论:这些结果支持在AD患者筛查阶段使用MDB,并支持ADAS-Cog随时间跟踪认知能力下降的进展。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Advance on the diagnostic potential of biological markers in the early detection of Alzheimer Disease The potential role played by artificial adaptive systems in enhancing our understanding of Alzheimer disease: The experience gained within Italian Interdisciplinary network on Alzheimer disease Phosphorylation of the amyloid precursor protein (APP): Is this a mechanism in favor or against Alzheimer's disease? Behavioural and psychological symptoms of dementia: clinical aspects Oxidative stress in Alzheimer's disease: a selective status report
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1