Case Study: Water budget of a dairy farm with a tie-stall barn for milk cows and summer pasturing of heifers and dry cows

A.C. VanderZaag , S. Burtt , X. Vergé , S. Piquette , T. Wright , R. Kroebel , R. Gordon
{"title":"Case Study: Water budget of a dairy farm with a tie-stall barn for milk cows and summer pasturing of heifers and dry cows","authors":"A.C. VanderZaag ,&nbsp;S. Burtt ,&nbsp;X. Vergé ,&nbsp;S. Piquette ,&nbsp;T. Wright ,&nbsp;R. Kroebel ,&nbsp;R. Gordon","doi":"10.15232/pas.2017-01654","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Water use (i.e., pumped water) was measured over a full year on a small dairy farm consisting of ~34 lactating and ~39 nonlactating animals (calves, heifers, and dry cows). Crop production was rain fed and was not included in the analysis. Animals were housed in a tie-stall<span> barn during the winter and cool season (mid-October to mid-May) and outdoors in a yard or pasture during the warm season. Annual average water use was 5,180 L/d, with 82% being drinking water and 18% for milking system cleaning. Distinct diurnal patterns of drinking water intake were observed for each animal group, which differed when cows were located indoors or outdoors. Seasonal changes in water intake were significant. Nonlactating animals accounted for 27% of whole-farm water intake in the summer (July–September). In the warm season, herd-scale milk production declined while water consumption increased. As a result, the whole-farm water used per liter of milk had a strong positive correlation with monthly average temperature humidity index (THI) and could have been additionally influenced by other factors such as herd composition, precipitation, feed intake, forage quality and availability, and day length. When THI was below 50, water use ranged from 4.3 to 4.8 L/kg of milk, and it increased to a maximum of 6.7 L/kg at a THI of 68. The annual average water use was 5.35 L/kg of milk. This study demonstrates that the water used per kilogram of milk produced was affected not only by changes in water use but also by changes in herd-scale milk production.</span></p></div>","PeriodicalId":22841,"journal":{"name":"The Professional Animal Scientist","volume":"34 1","pages":"Pages 108-117"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.15232/pas.2017-01654","citationCount":"7","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Professional Animal Scientist","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1080744618300135","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 7

Abstract

Water use (i.e., pumped water) was measured over a full year on a small dairy farm consisting of ~34 lactating and ~39 nonlactating animals (calves, heifers, and dry cows). Crop production was rain fed and was not included in the analysis. Animals were housed in a tie-stall barn during the winter and cool season (mid-October to mid-May) and outdoors in a yard or pasture during the warm season. Annual average water use was 5,180 L/d, with 82% being drinking water and 18% for milking system cleaning. Distinct diurnal patterns of drinking water intake were observed for each animal group, which differed when cows were located indoors or outdoors. Seasonal changes in water intake were significant. Nonlactating animals accounted for 27% of whole-farm water intake in the summer (July–September). In the warm season, herd-scale milk production declined while water consumption increased. As a result, the whole-farm water used per liter of milk had a strong positive correlation with monthly average temperature humidity index (THI) and could have been additionally influenced by other factors such as herd composition, precipitation, feed intake, forage quality and availability, and day length. When THI was below 50, water use ranged from 4.3 to 4.8 L/kg of milk, and it increased to a maximum of 6.7 L/kg at a THI of 68. The annual average water use was 5.35 L/kg of milk. This study demonstrates that the water used per kilogram of milk produced was affected not only by changes in water use but also by changes in herd-scale milk production.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
案例研究:一个奶牛场的水预算,该奶牛场有一个固定的牛棚,用于饲养奶牛和夏季放牧的小母牛和干奶牛
在一个由34头泌乳动物和39头非泌乳动物(小牛、小母牛和干奶牛)组成的小型奶牛场,测量了一整年的用水量(即抽水)。作物生产是雨养的,不包括在分析中。在冬季和凉爽的季节(10月中旬至5月中旬),动物被安置在一个系棚谷仓里,在温暖的季节,动物被安置在室外的院子或牧场上。年平均用水量为5180升/天,其中82%为饮用水,18%用于挤奶系统清洗。观察到不同动物组的日饮水模式,当奶牛位于室内或室外时,这种模式有所不同。饮水量的季节变化显著。在夏季(7 - 9月),非哺乳期动物占整个农场饮水量的27%。在温暖季节,畜群规模的产奶量下降,而用水量增加。结果表明,每升牛奶的全农场用水量与月平均温湿度指数(THI)呈显著正相关,并可能受到畜群组成、降水量、采食量、饲料质量和可利用性以及日长等其他因素的影响。当THI低于50时,牛奶的用水量在4.3 ~ 4.8 L/kg之间,当THI为68时,牛奶的用水量最大,达到6.7 L/kg。年平均用水量为5.35 L/kg牛奶。这项研究表明,每千克牛奶的用水量不仅受到用水量变化的影响,还受到畜群规模牛奶产量变化的影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Case Study: Effect of exercise programs during receiving in a commercial feedlot on behavior and productivity of Brahman crossbred calves: Results from a commercial environment and a comparison to the research environment Effects of field pea supplementation on digestibility and rumen volatile fatty acid concentrations of beef-cattle diets containing high and low quality forages Enteric nitrous oxide emissions from beef cattle Invited Review: Detection and management of pregnancy loss in the cow herd1 Review: Sperm: Comparative morphology and function related to altered reproductive strategies and fertility in mammals
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1