A Pilot Randomised Controlled Trial Evaluating a Regenerative Epithelial Suspension for Medium-Size Partial-Thickness Burns in Children: The BRACS Trial.
Anjana Bairagi, Zephanie Tyack, Roy Kimble, Dimitrios Vagenas, Steven M McPhail, Bronwyn Griffin
{"title":"A Pilot Randomised Controlled Trial Evaluating a Regenerative Epithelial Suspension for Medium-Size Partial-Thickness Burns in Children: The BRACS Trial.","authors":"Anjana Bairagi, Zephanie Tyack, Roy Kimble, Dimitrios Vagenas, Steven M McPhail, Bronwyn Griffin","doi":"10.3390/ebj4010012","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>There is little evidence regarding the efficacy of Regenerative Epidermal Suspension (RES™) management for paediatric partial-thickness burns. The Biobrane<sup>®</sup> RECELL<sup>®</sup> Autologous skin Cell suspension and Silver dressings (BRACS) Trial evaluated three dressings for the re-epithelialisation of partial-thickness burns in children.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Eligible children (age ≤ 16 years; ≥5% TBSA; ≤48 h of injury) were randomised to silver dressings, RES™/Biobrane<sup>®</sup> or Biobrane<sup>®</sup>. The measured outcomes were the time to re-epithelialisation (primary outcome), pain, itch, intervention fidelity, treatment satisfaction, health-related quality of life, health resource utilisation and adverse effects.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The median time to re-epithelialisation in days was no different for RES™/Biobrane<sup>®</sup> at 12 (IQR: 5.6-18.4; <i>n</i> = 7) and slower by two days for Biobrane<sup>®</sup> at 14 (IQR: 6.3-21.7; <i>n</i> = 7) when compared to silver dressings 12 (IQR: 3.7-20.3; <i>n</i> = 8). Reduced pain, fewer infections, no sepsis, no skin graft, and the lowest impact on health-related quality of life were reported in the RES™/Biobrane<sup>®</sup> group compared to other groups. Due to the COVID-19 pandemic, recruitment suspension resulted in a smaller cohort than expected and an underpowered study.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The pilot trial findings should be interpreted cautiously; however, they indicate that a fully powered randomised controlled trial is warranted to substantiate the role of RES™ for medium to large paediatric partial-thickness burn management.</p>","PeriodicalId":72961,"journal":{"name":"European burn journal","volume":"16 1","pages":"121-141"},"PeriodicalIF":1.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-03-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11571849/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European burn journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/ebj4010012","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background: There is little evidence regarding the efficacy of Regenerative Epidermal Suspension (RES™) management for paediatric partial-thickness burns. The Biobrane® RECELL® Autologous skin Cell suspension and Silver dressings (BRACS) Trial evaluated three dressings for the re-epithelialisation of partial-thickness burns in children.
Methods: Eligible children (age ≤ 16 years; ≥5% TBSA; ≤48 h of injury) were randomised to silver dressings, RES™/Biobrane® or Biobrane®. The measured outcomes were the time to re-epithelialisation (primary outcome), pain, itch, intervention fidelity, treatment satisfaction, health-related quality of life, health resource utilisation and adverse effects.
Results: The median time to re-epithelialisation in days was no different for RES™/Biobrane® at 12 (IQR: 5.6-18.4; n = 7) and slower by two days for Biobrane® at 14 (IQR: 6.3-21.7; n = 7) when compared to silver dressings 12 (IQR: 3.7-20.3; n = 8). Reduced pain, fewer infections, no sepsis, no skin graft, and the lowest impact on health-related quality of life were reported in the RES™/Biobrane® group compared to other groups. Due to the COVID-19 pandemic, recruitment suspension resulted in a smaller cohort than expected and an underpowered study.
Conclusions: The pilot trial findings should be interpreted cautiously; however, they indicate that a fully powered randomised controlled trial is warranted to substantiate the role of RES™ for medium to large paediatric partial-thickness burn management.