A Pilot Randomised Controlled Trial Evaluating a Regenerative Epithelial Suspension for Medium-Size Partial-Thickness Burns in Children: The BRACS Trial.

IF 1 Q4 CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE European burn journal Pub Date : 2023-03-22 DOI:10.3390/ebj4010012
Anjana Bairagi, Zephanie Tyack, Roy Kimble, Dimitrios Vagenas, Steven M McPhail, Bronwyn Griffin
{"title":"A Pilot Randomised Controlled Trial Evaluating a Regenerative Epithelial Suspension for Medium-Size Partial-Thickness Burns in Children: The BRACS Trial.","authors":"Anjana Bairagi, Zephanie Tyack, Roy Kimble, Dimitrios Vagenas, Steven M McPhail, Bronwyn Griffin","doi":"10.3390/ebj4010012","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>There is little evidence regarding the efficacy of Regenerative Epidermal Suspension (RES™) management for paediatric partial-thickness burns. The Biobrane<sup>®</sup> RECELL<sup>®</sup> Autologous skin Cell suspension and Silver dressings (BRACS) Trial evaluated three dressings for the re-epithelialisation of partial-thickness burns in children.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Eligible children (age ≤ 16 years; ≥5% TBSA; ≤48 h of injury) were randomised to silver dressings, RES™/Biobrane<sup>®</sup> or Biobrane<sup>®</sup>. The measured outcomes were the time to re-epithelialisation (primary outcome), pain, itch, intervention fidelity, treatment satisfaction, health-related quality of life, health resource utilisation and adverse effects.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The median time to re-epithelialisation in days was no different for RES™/Biobrane<sup>®</sup> at 12 (IQR: 5.6-18.4; <i>n</i> = 7) and slower by two days for Biobrane<sup>®</sup> at 14 (IQR: 6.3-21.7; <i>n</i> = 7) when compared to silver dressings 12 (IQR: 3.7-20.3; <i>n</i> = 8). Reduced pain, fewer infections, no sepsis, no skin graft, and the lowest impact on health-related quality of life were reported in the RES™/Biobrane<sup>®</sup> group compared to other groups. Due to the COVID-19 pandemic, recruitment suspension resulted in a smaller cohort than expected and an underpowered study.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The pilot trial findings should be interpreted cautiously; however, they indicate that a fully powered randomised controlled trial is warranted to substantiate the role of RES™ for medium to large paediatric partial-thickness burn management.</p>","PeriodicalId":72961,"journal":{"name":"European burn journal","volume":"16 1","pages":"121-141"},"PeriodicalIF":1.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-03-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11571849/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European burn journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/ebj4010012","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: There is little evidence regarding the efficacy of Regenerative Epidermal Suspension (RES™) management for paediatric partial-thickness burns. The Biobrane® RECELL® Autologous skin Cell suspension and Silver dressings (BRACS) Trial evaluated three dressings for the re-epithelialisation of partial-thickness burns in children.

Methods: Eligible children (age ≤ 16 years; ≥5% TBSA; ≤48 h of injury) were randomised to silver dressings, RES™/Biobrane® or Biobrane®. The measured outcomes were the time to re-epithelialisation (primary outcome), pain, itch, intervention fidelity, treatment satisfaction, health-related quality of life, health resource utilisation and adverse effects.

Results: The median time to re-epithelialisation in days was no different for RES™/Biobrane® at 12 (IQR: 5.6-18.4; n = 7) and slower by two days for Biobrane® at 14 (IQR: 6.3-21.7; n = 7) when compared to silver dressings 12 (IQR: 3.7-20.3; n = 8). Reduced pain, fewer infections, no sepsis, no skin graft, and the lowest impact on health-related quality of life were reported in the RES™/Biobrane® group compared to other groups. Due to the COVID-19 pandemic, recruitment suspension resulted in a smaller cohort than expected and an underpowered study.

Conclusions: The pilot trial findings should be interpreted cautiously; however, they indicate that a fully powered randomised controlled trial is warranted to substantiate the role of RES™ for medium to large paediatric partial-thickness burn management.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
一项试点随机对照试验,评估用于治疗儿童中等面积局部烧伤的再生上皮悬浮液:BRACS 试验。
背景:关于再生表皮悬浮液(RES™)治疗小儿局部烧伤的疗效,几乎没有证据。Biobrane® RECELL®自体皮肤细胞悬浮液和银敷料(BRACS)试验评估了三种敷料对儿童局部烧伤的再上皮化效果:符合条件的儿童(年龄≤16岁;≥5% TBSA;受伤≤48小时)被随机分配到银敷料、RES™/Biobrane®或Biobrane®。测量结果包括再上皮化时间(主要结果)、疼痛、瘙痒、干预忠实度、治疗满意度、与健康相关的生活质量、卫生资源利用率和不良反应:结果:与银敷料相比,RES™/Biobrane®的再上皮化时间中位数为12天(IQR:5.6-18.4;n = 7),无差异;Biobrane®的再上皮化时间中位数为14天(IQR:6.3-21.7;n = 7),比银敷料慢两天(IQR:3.7-20.3;n = 8)。与其他组相比,RES™/Biobrane®组疼痛减轻、感染减少、无败血症、无皮肤移植,对健康相关生活质量的影响最小。由于COVID-19大流行,招募工作暂停,导致研究对象比预期的要少,研究力量不足:应谨慎解释试点试验的结果;不过,这些结果表明,有必要进行一项完全有效的随机对照试验,以证实RES™在大中型儿科部分创面烧伤治疗中的作用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Lost Work Due to Burn-Related Disability in a US Working Population. Development of Biofidelic Skin Simulants Based on Fresh Cadaveric Skin Tests. Bromelain in Burn Care: Advancements in Enzymatic Debridement and Patient Outcomes. 26 Years of Skin Banking in Finland. Life Satisfaction After Burn Injury-A Comprehensive Review.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1