Lessons for private colleges that offer non-accredited courses: EMIS v Health Professions Council of SA [2013] ZASCA 87

Q4 Social Sciences International Journal of Private Law Pub Date : 2014-09-23 DOI:10.1504/IJPL.2014.064928
Moses Retselisitsoe Phooko
{"title":"Lessons for private colleges that offer non-accredited courses: EMIS v Health Professions Council of SA [2013] ZASCA 87","authors":"Moses Retselisitsoe Phooko","doi":"10.1504/IJPL.2014.064928","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Education is an important tool to help citizens fully exercise their democratic rights and contribute to the development of their country. Since the 1990s, there has been a significant growth in the number of private further education and training institutions (private colleges) in South Africa. Some of these colleges are registered with the Department of Higher Education (DHE) in order to offer certain specified courses. Others are not recognised and operate illegally. The effect of those operating illegally is that they are unknown to the DHE and any qualifications that they offer are worthless. Private colleges that are registered are authorised to offer certain identified courses and can only offer qualifications that they are permitted to teach. Should they decide otherwise and offer additional courses without the approval of the relevant bodies, they are operating illegally. This case note critiques the judgement of the Supreme Court of Appeal of South Africa (SCA) in EMS v Health Professions Council of SA 1 wherein the SCA dismissed the appellant’s appeal against the respondent’s decision to withdraw the appellant’s accreditation.","PeriodicalId":39023,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Private Law","volume":"188 1","pages":"367"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2014-09-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Private Law","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1504/IJPL.2014.064928","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Education is an important tool to help citizens fully exercise their democratic rights and contribute to the development of their country. Since the 1990s, there has been a significant growth in the number of private further education and training institutions (private colleges) in South Africa. Some of these colleges are registered with the Department of Higher Education (DHE) in order to offer certain specified courses. Others are not recognised and operate illegally. The effect of those operating illegally is that they are unknown to the DHE and any qualifications that they offer are worthless. Private colleges that are registered are authorised to offer certain identified courses and can only offer qualifications that they are permitted to teach. Should they decide otherwise and offer additional courses without the approval of the relevant bodies, they are operating illegally. This case note critiques the judgement of the Supreme Court of Appeal of South Africa (SCA) in EMS v Health Professions Council of SA 1 wherein the SCA dismissed the appellant’s appeal against the respondent’s decision to withdraw the appellant’s accreditation.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
提供非认证课程的私立大学的课程:EMIS诉SA卫生专业委员会[2013]ZASCA 87
教育是帮助公民充分行使民主权利、为国家发展作出贡献的重要工具。自20世纪90年代以来,南非私立继续教育和培训机构(私立学院)的数量有了显著增长。其中一些学院在高等教育部(DHE)注册,以提供某些特定课程。其他的则不被承认并非法经营。那些非法经营的影响是他们不为教育部所知,他们提供的任何资格都是毫无价值的。注册的私立学院被授权提供特定的课程,并且只能提供他们被允许教授的资格证书。如果他们擅自决定,未经有关部门批准而开设额外课程,则属于非法经营。本案件说明批评南非最高上诉法院在EMS诉SA 1卫生专业委员会一案中的判决,其中最高上诉法院驳回了上诉人对被告撤销上诉人资格的决定提出的上诉。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
1
期刊最新文献
The evolution of the non-oral modification clause Legal regulation of migration policy in EU countries: current challenges The application of the concept of consideration to smart contracts on a blockchain. The propriety of mandatory arbitration in Nigeria vis-à-vis the doctrine of voluntariness: the imperativeness of charting a new course The evolution of the non-oral modification clause
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1