A swarm-based hybrid routing protocol to support multiple Quality of Service (QoS) metrics in mobile ad hoc networks

S. Nivetha, R. Asokan, N. Senthilkumaran
{"title":"A swarm-based hybrid routing protocol to support multiple Quality of Service (QoS) metrics in mobile ad hoc networks","authors":"S. Nivetha, R. Asokan, N. Senthilkumaran","doi":"10.1109/ICCCNT.2013.6726804","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Quality of Service support in routing for Mobile Ad hoc Networks (MANETs) is a challenging process because of the limitation on available resources and the dynamic topology. The main purpose of QoS routing is to find a feasible path that has sufficient resources to satisfy the constraints. A fundamental problem in QoS routing is to find a path between a source and destination that satisfies two or more end-to-end QoS constraints/metrics. Considering more than two metrics involves more computational complexity and it is proved to be NP-complete problem. Stochastic optimization techniques are better solutions for these kinds of problems. A routing model can be chosen either as proactive or reactive. Purely proactive protocols are not optimal for rapidly changing topologies and purely reactive protocols are often inappropriate for relatively static networks. In addition, reactive protocols also suffer with additional delay for real-time traffic. In such scenarios, hybrid routing is proven to improve on purely reactive-routing or purely proactive-routing if most traffic is localized. In order to achieve routing efficiency in such environment, a hybrid routing strategy is proposed which combines the advantages of both proactive and reactive mechanisms. In this paper, a novel QoS routing strategy called Swarm-based Hybrid Routing Protocol (SHRP) based on ant colony optimization is proposed to support the three metrics such as end-to-end delay, bandwidth and hop count. To evaluate the performance of SHRP, a series of simulations are carried out with the simulator QualNet. The simulation results of SHRP are compared with the hybrid routing protocols ZRP and HOPNET. Through the simulation results, it has been showed that SHRP fabricates better performance than ZRP and HOPNET in terms of packet delivery ratio, throughput, end-to-end delay, bandwidth and hopcount.","PeriodicalId":6330,"journal":{"name":"2013 Fourth International Conference on Computing, Communications and Networking Technologies (ICCCNT)","volume":"281 1","pages":"1-8"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2013-07-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"8","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2013 Fourth International Conference on Computing, Communications and Networking Technologies (ICCCNT)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/ICCCNT.2013.6726804","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 8

Abstract

Quality of Service support in routing for Mobile Ad hoc Networks (MANETs) is a challenging process because of the limitation on available resources and the dynamic topology. The main purpose of QoS routing is to find a feasible path that has sufficient resources to satisfy the constraints. A fundamental problem in QoS routing is to find a path between a source and destination that satisfies two or more end-to-end QoS constraints/metrics. Considering more than two metrics involves more computational complexity and it is proved to be NP-complete problem. Stochastic optimization techniques are better solutions for these kinds of problems. A routing model can be chosen either as proactive or reactive. Purely proactive protocols are not optimal for rapidly changing topologies and purely reactive protocols are often inappropriate for relatively static networks. In addition, reactive protocols also suffer with additional delay for real-time traffic. In such scenarios, hybrid routing is proven to improve on purely reactive-routing or purely proactive-routing if most traffic is localized. In order to achieve routing efficiency in such environment, a hybrid routing strategy is proposed which combines the advantages of both proactive and reactive mechanisms. In this paper, a novel QoS routing strategy called Swarm-based Hybrid Routing Protocol (SHRP) based on ant colony optimization is proposed to support the three metrics such as end-to-end delay, bandwidth and hop count. To evaluate the performance of SHRP, a series of simulations are carried out with the simulator QualNet. The simulation results of SHRP are compared with the hybrid routing protocols ZRP and HOPNET. Through the simulation results, it has been showed that SHRP fabricates better performance than ZRP and HOPNET in terms of packet delivery ratio, throughput, end-to-end delay, bandwidth and hopcount.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
一种在移动自组织网络中支持多种服务质量(QoS)指标的基于群的混合路由协议
由于可用资源和动态拓扑的限制,移动自组网路由的服务质量支持是一个具有挑战性的过程。QoS路由的主要目的是寻找一条具有足够资源来满足约束的可行路径。QoS路由的一个基本问题是在源和目标之间找到一条满足两个或多个端到端QoS约束/度量的路径。考虑两个以上度量涉及更大的计算复杂度,证明了它是np完全问题。随机优化技术是解决这类问题的较好方法。路由模型可以选择为主动模式或被动模式。纯粹的主动协议对于快速变化的拓扑并不是最优的,而纯粹的被动协议通常不适合相对静态的网络。此外,响应式协议还面临实时流量的额外延迟。在这种情况下,如果大多数流量是本地化的,混合路由被证明比纯反应路由或纯主动路由更好。为了在这种环境下提高路由效率,提出了一种结合主动和被动两种机制优点的混合路由策略。本文提出了一种基于蚁群优化的基于群的混合路由协议(Swarm-based Hybrid routing Protocol, SHRP),以支持端到端时延、带宽和跳数这三个指标。为了评估SHRP的性能,利用仿真器QualNet进行了一系列的仿真。将SHRP的仿真结果与混合路由协议ZRP和HOPNET进行了比较。仿真结果表明,SHRP在分组传送率、吞吐量、端到端延迟、带宽和hopcount等方面都优于ZRP和HOPNET。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
“Multi-tenant SaaS cloud” Reduced order linear functional observers for large scale linear discrete-time control systems Multi pattern matching technique on fragmented and out-of-order packet streams for intrusion detection system Detection and tracking of moving objects by fuzzy textures Evacuation map generation using maze routing
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1