ILD: VOC-Analyse des Atemabdrucks als vielversprechende Methode der nicht invasiven Diagnostik

F. Drakopanagiotakis, A. Günther
{"title":"ILD: VOC-Analyse des Atemabdrucks als vielversprechende Methode der nicht invasiven Diagnostik","authors":"F. Drakopanagiotakis, A. Günther","doi":"10.1159/000526025","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Fibrotic Interstitial lung diseases (ILD) are a heterogeneous group of chronic lung diseases characterized by diverse degrees of lung inflammation and remodeling. They include idiopathic ILD such as idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF), and ILD secondary to chronic inflammatory diseases such as connective tissue disease (CTD). Precise differential diagnosis of ILD is critical since anti-inflammatory and immunosuppressive drugs, which are beneficial in inflammatory ILD, are detrimental in IPF. However, differential diagnosis of ILD is still difficult and often requires an invasive lung biopsy. The primary aim of this study is to identify volatile organic compounds (VOCs) patterns in exhaled air to non-invasively discriminate IPF and CTD-ILD. As secondary aim, the association between the IPF and CTD-ILD discriminating VOC patterns and functional impairment is investigated. Methods: Fifty-three IPF patients, 53 CTD-ILD patients and 51 controls donated exhaled air, which was analyzed for its VOC content using gas chromatograph-time of flight-mass spectrometry. Results: By applying multivariate analysis, a discriminative profile of 34 VOCs was observed to discriminate between IPF patients and healthy controls whereas 11 VOCs were able to distinguish between CTD-ILD patients and healthy controls. The separation between IPF and CTD-ILD could be made using 16 discriminating VOCs, that also displayed a significant correlation with total lung capacity and the 6 min’ walk distance. Conclusions: This study reports for the first time that specific VOC profiles can be found to differentiate IPF and CTD-ILD from both healthy controls and each other. Moreover, an ILD-specific VOC profile was strongly correlated with functional parameters. Future research applying larger cohorts of patients suffering from a larger variety of ILDs should confirm the potential use of breathomics to facilitate fast, non-invasive and proper differential diagnosis of specific ILDs in the future as first step towards personalized medicine for these complex diseases.","PeriodicalId":17887,"journal":{"name":"Kompass Autoimmun","volume":"12 1","pages":"121 - 123"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-07-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Kompass Autoimmun","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1159/000526025","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Fibrotic Interstitial lung diseases (ILD) are a heterogeneous group of chronic lung diseases characterized by diverse degrees of lung inflammation and remodeling. They include idiopathic ILD such as idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF), and ILD secondary to chronic inflammatory diseases such as connective tissue disease (CTD). Precise differential diagnosis of ILD is critical since anti-inflammatory and immunosuppressive drugs, which are beneficial in inflammatory ILD, are detrimental in IPF. However, differential diagnosis of ILD is still difficult and often requires an invasive lung biopsy. The primary aim of this study is to identify volatile organic compounds (VOCs) patterns in exhaled air to non-invasively discriminate IPF and CTD-ILD. As secondary aim, the association between the IPF and CTD-ILD discriminating VOC patterns and functional impairment is investigated. Methods: Fifty-three IPF patients, 53 CTD-ILD patients and 51 controls donated exhaled air, which was analyzed for its VOC content using gas chromatograph-time of flight-mass spectrometry. Results: By applying multivariate analysis, a discriminative profile of 34 VOCs was observed to discriminate between IPF patients and healthy controls whereas 11 VOCs were able to distinguish between CTD-ILD patients and healthy controls. The separation between IPF and CTD-ILD could be made using 16 discriminating VOCs, that also displayed a significant correlation with total lung capacity and the 6 min’ walk distance. Conclusions: This study reports for the first time that specific VOC profiles can be found to differentiate IPF and CTD-ILD from both healthy controls and each other. Moreover, an ILD-specific VOC profile was strongly correlated with functional parameters. Future research applying larger cohorts of patients suffering from a larger variety of ILDs should confirm the potential use of breathomics to facilitate fast, non-invasive and proper differential diagnosis of specific ILDs in the future as first step towards personalized medicine for these complex diseases.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
侦测呼吸系统的声音分析成为非侵入性诊断学的很有希望的方法
背景:纤维化间质性肺病(ILD)是一种异质性的慢性肺部疾病,其特征是不同程度的肺部炎症和重塑。它们包括特发性ILD,如特发性肺纤维化(IPF),以及继发于慢性炎性疾病(如结缔组织病(CTD))的ILD。精确的ILD鉴别诊断是至关重要的,因为抗炎和免疫抑制药物对炎性ILD是有益的,对IPF是有害的。然而,ILD的鉴别诊断仍然很困难,通常需要进行有创性肺活检。本研究的主要目的是确定呼出空气中的挥发性有机化合物(VOCs)模式,以非侵入性地区分IPF和CTD-ILD。作为次要目的,研究IPF和CTD-ILD区分VOC模式与功能损伤之间的关系。方法:53例IPF患者、53例CTD-ILD患者和51例对照者,采用气相色谱-飞行时间-质谱法测定其挥发性有机化合物(VOC)含量。结果:通过多变量分析,观察到34种挥发性有机化合物能够区分IPF患者和健康对照,而11种挥发性有机化合物能够区分CTD-ILD患者和健康对照。IPF和CTD-ILD可通过16种可区分的VOCs进行区分,且与总肺活量和6 min步行距离有显著相关性。结论:本研究首次发现了IPF和CTD-ILD的特定VOC谱,可以区分健康对照和其他对照。此外,ild特异性VOC谱与功能参数密切相关。未来的研究将应用更多种类的ild患者进行更大规模的研究,以确认呼吸组学在未来的潜在应用,以促进对特定ild的快速、无创和适当的鉴别诊断,作为这些复杂疾病个性化医疗的第一步。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Morbus Crohn: Vielversprechende Behandlungsoption eines neuen IL-23-Inhibitors auf dem Weg zur Zulassung Moderne Immunologie hat unsere Behandlungsoptionen stark verändert Behandlung der eosinophilen Granulomatose mit Polyangiitis: Ist Benralizumab eine Alternative? Treat hard and early in SSc-ILD: milde ILD ist immer noch ILD Biologische Therapie bei systemischem Lupus erythematodes, Antiphospholipid-Syndrom und Sjögren-Syndrom: evidenz- und praxisbasierte Leitlinien
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1