Initial experience of a single referral centre using excimer laser coronary atherectomy-assisted expansion in undilatable stents: Excimer laser in undilatable stents.

D. Adikari, R. Giles, N. Jepson, M. Pitney
{"title":"Initial experience of a single referral centre using excimer laser coronary atherectomy-assisted expansion in undilatable stents: Excimer laser in undilatable stents.","authors":"D. Adikari, R. Giles, N. Jepson, M. Pitney","doi":"10.4244/aij-d-21-00024","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Aims\nUndilatable stents with severe peri-stent calcification are an important cause of target lesion failure and therapeutic options are limited. We report our initial experience with the safety and efficacy of excimer laser coronary atherectomy (ELCA)-assisted expansion of undilatable stents.\n\n\nMethods and results\nELCA was performed with saline, blood and contrast-enhanced trains. All lesions were post-dilated at high pressures and treated with a drug-eluting balloon. Thirty-one lesions with undilatable stents were included at a single centre with experienced operators from March 2016 to February 2021. The mean number of prior procedures for in-stent restenosis was three and 14 lesions had multiple layers of stent. Procedural success (>50% increase in minimal stent diameter [MSD]) and adequate stent expansion (MSD >70% of reference vessel diameter) was achieved in all lesions. At six-month follow-up (N=26 lesions), there were six periprocedural myocardial infarctions due to slow flow, two cardiac deaths and one target lesion revascularisation. There were no perforations.\n\n\nConclusions\nOur niche experience at a centre with experienced operators demonstrated that ELCA led to larger final lumen and stent dimensions in highly selected patients with undilatable stents and recurrent restenosis at the cost of relatively frequent slow flow.","PeriodicalId":72310,"journal":{"name":"AsiaIntervention","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"AsiaIntervention","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4244/aij-d-21-00024","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Aims Undilatable stents with severe peri-stent calcification are an important cause of target lesion failure and therapeutic options are limited. We report our initial experience with the safety and efficacy of excimer laser coronary atherectomy (ELCA)-assisted expansion of undilatable stents. Methods and results ELCA was performed with saline, blood and contrast-enhanced trains. All lesions were post-dilated at high pressures and treated with a drug-eluting balloon. Thirty-one lesions with undilatable stents were included at a single centre with experienced operators from March 2016 to February 2021. The mean number of prior procedures for in-stent restenosis was three and 14 lesions had multiple layers of stent. Procedural success (>50% increase in minimal stent diameter [MSD]) and adequate stent expansion (MSD >70% of reference vessel diameter) was achieved in all lesions. At six-month follow-up (N=26 lesions), there were six periprocedural myocardial infarctions due to slow flow, two cardiac deaths and one target lesion revascularisation. There were no perforations. Conclusions Our niche experience at a centre with experienced operators demonstrated that ELCA led to larger final lumen and stent dimensions in highly selected patients with undilatable stents and recurrent restenosis at the cost of relatively frequent slow flow.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
单个转诊中心使用准分子激光冠状动脉切除术辅助扩张不可扩张支架的初步经验:准分子激光在不可扩张支架中的应用。
不可扩张支架伴支架周围严重钙化是靶病变失败的重要原因,治疗选择有限。我们报告了准分子激光冠状动脉粥样硬化切除术(ELCA)辅助扩张不可扩张支架的安全性和有效性的初步经验。方法与结果selca采用生理盐水、血液和增强显影。所有病变均在高压下扩张,并用药物洗脱球囊治疗。2016年3月至2021年2月,在经验丰富的操作人员的指导下,在一个中心研究了31个带有不可扩张支架的病变。支架内再狭窄的平均手术次数为3次,14个病变有多层支架。手术成功(最小支架直径[MSD]增加>50%)和适当的支架扩张(MSD >参考血管直径的70%)在所有病变中都获得了成功。在6个月的随访中(N=26个病变),有6例术中心肌梗死是由于血流缓慢,2例心源性死亡和1例靶病变血运重建。没有穿孔。结论:我们在一个经验丰富的操作人员中心的经验表明,ELCA在高度选择的支架不可扩张和复发性再狭窄的患者中,以相对频繁的慢血流为代价,导致更大的最终管腔和支架尺寸。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
A hospital lipid-lowering protocol improves 2-year clinical outcomes in patients with acute coronary syndrome. Accuracy of machine learning in predicting outcomes post-percutaneous coronary intervention: a systematic review. Clinical safety and performance of the world's thinnest-strut Evermine50 everolimus-eluting stent: a 24-month follow-up of the Evermine 50 EES - 1 study. First-in-human novel pacing-over-the-wire technique during TAVR with the SENTINEL cerebral protection device: the SENTIPACE pilot study. Hybrid strategy of drug-eluting stent and drug-coated balloon in the treatment of de novo coronary artery disease: 1-year clinical outcomes.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1