Gay Male Academics in UK Business and Management Schools: Negotiating Heteronormativities in Everyday Work Life

M. Ozturk, N. Rumens
{"title":"Gay Male Academics in UK Business and Management Schools: Negotiating Heteronormativities in Everyday Work Life","authors":"M. Ozturk, N. Rumens","doi":"10.1111/1467-8551.12061","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This paper contributes to a neglected topic area about lesbian, gay, bisexual and trans people's employment experiences in UK business and management schools. Drawing on queer theory to problematize essentialist notions of sexuality, we explore how gay male academics negotiate and challenge discourses of heteronormativity within different work contexts. Using in‐depth interview data, the paper shows that gay male academics are continually constrained by heteronormativity in constructing viable subject positions as ‘normal’, often having to reproduce heteronormative values that squeeze opportunities for generating non‐heteronormative ‘queer’ sexualities, identities and selves. Constructing a presence as an openly gay academic can invoke another binary through which identities are (re)constructed: as either ‘gay’ (a cleaned up version of gay male sexuality that sustains a heteronormative moral order) or ‘queer’ (cast as radical, disruptive and sexually promiscuous). Data also reveal how gay men challenge organizational heteronormativities through teaching and research activities, producing reverse discourses and creating alternative knowledge/power regimes, despite institutional barriers and risks of perpetuating heteronormative binaries and constructs. Study findings call for pedagogical and research practices that ‘queer’ (rupture, destabilize, disrupt) management knowledge and the heterosexual/homosexual binary, enabling non‐heteronormative voices, perspectives, identities and ways of relating to emerge in queer(er) business and management schools.","PeriodicalId":84919,"journal":{"name":"International demographics","volume":"39 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2014-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"64","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International demographics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8551.12061","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 64

Abstract

This paper contributes to a neglected topic area about lesbian, gay, bisexual and trans people's employment experiences in UK business and management schools. Drawing on queer theory to problematize essentialist notions of sexuality, we explore how gay male academics negotiate and challenge discourses of heteronormativity within different work contexts. Using in‐depth interview data, the paper shows that gay male academics are continually constrained by heteronormativity in constructing viable subject positions as ‘normal’, often having to reproduce heteronormative values that squeeze opportunities for generating non‐heteronormative ‘queer’ sexualities, identities and selves. Constructing a presence as an openly gay academic can invoke another binary through which identities are (re)constructed: as either ‘gay’ (a cleaned up version of gay male sexuality that sustains a heteronormative moral order) or ‘queer’ (cast as radical, disruptive and sexually promiscuous). Data also reveal how gay men challenge organizational heteronormativities through teaching and research activities, producing reverse discourses and creating alternative knowledge/power regimes, despite institutional barriers and risks of perpetuating heteronormative binaries and constructs. Study findings call for pedagogical and research practices that ‘queer’ (rupture, destabilize, disrupt) management knowledge and the heterosexual/homosexual binary, enabling non‐heteronormative voices, perspectives, identities and ways of relating to emerge in queer(er) business and management schools.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
英国商业和管理学院的男同性恋学者:在日常工作生活中协商异性恋规范
本文对英国商业和管理学校中女同性恋、男同性恋、双性恋和变性人的就业经历这一被忽视的话题领域做出了贡献。利用酷儿理论来质疑性的本质主义概念,我们探讨了男同性恋学者如何在不同的工作环境中协商和挑战异性恋规范的话语。通过深度访谈数据,该论文表明,男同性恋学者在构建可行的“正常”主体立场时,不断受到异性恋规范的约束,经常不得不再现异性恋规范的价值观,从而挤压了产生非异性恋规范的“酷儿”性行为、身份和自我的机会。作为一名公开的同性恋学者,构建自己的存在可以引发另一种二元性,通过这种二元性,身份被(重新)构建:要么是“同性恋”(一种维护异性恋道德秩序的同性恋男性性行为的净化版本),要么是“酷儿”(被塑造成激进、破坏性和性滥交的形象)。数据还揭示了男同性恋者如何通过教学和研究活动挑战组织中的异性恋规范,产生反向话语,创造替代性知识/权力制度,尽管存在制度障碍和延续异性恋规范二元结构的风险。研究结果呼吁教学和研究实践“酷儿”(断裂、不稳定、破坏)管理知识和异性恋/同性恋二元观念,使非异性恋规范的声音、观点、身份和相关方式出现在酷儿(er)商业和管理学校。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Behavioral Economics of Accounting: A Review of Archival Research on Individual Decision Makers Measuring and Calibrating the Racial/Ethnic Densities of Executives in US Public Companies Gender Salary Gap in the Auditing Profession: Trend and Explanations The Impact of CFO Gender on Corporate Overinvestment Getting Women on Board: Some Reflections on Research on Board Gender Diversity
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1