{"title":"Management Accounting and Strategy – A Review and Reflections on Future Research","authors":"S. Carmona, M. Ezzamel","doi":"10.1080/09638180.2023.2215821","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In this paper, we review extant research examining the relationship between management accounting and strategy. This relationship is not unidirectional as developments in strategic processes can also have strong ramifications for accounting systems, leading to their refinement and possible innovations. In addition to previous, valuable overviews focusing on the rational approach to examining the relationship between management accounting and strategy (e.g. Chenhall, 2003; Langfield-Smith, 1997, 2008), this paper also addresses interpretive and the poststructuralist studies. Although the three approaches have little cross-reference to each other, they collectively offer a rich tapestry of the relationship between accounting and strategy. Our review of the contributions made by these three streams of research suggest that, instead of treating those theoretical approaches as competitors, they should be considered complementary to each other. Such complementary perspective, we suggest, can provide many perceptive insights into ongoing research in this area. The paper concludes with some reflections on future research.","PeriodicalId":11764,"journal":{"name":"European Accounting Review","volume":"16 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Accounting Review","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/09638180.2023.2215821","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"BUSINESS, FINANCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2
Abstract
In this paper, we review extant research examining the relationship between management accounting and strategy. This relationship is not unidirectional as developments in strategic processes can also have strong ramifications for accounting systems, leading to their refinement and possible innovations. In addition to previous, valuable overviews focusing on the rational approach to examining the relationship between management accounting and strategy (e.g. Chenhall, 2003; Langfield-Smith, 1997, 2008), this paper also addresses interpretive and the poststructuralist studies. Although the three approaches have little cross-reference to each other, they collectively offer a rich tapestry of the relationship between accounting and strategy. Our review of the contributions made by these three streams of research suggest that, instead of treating those theoretical approaches as competitors, they should be considered complementary to each other. Such complementary perspective, we suggest, can provide many perceptive insights into ongoing research in this area. The paper concludes with some reflections on future research.
期刊介绍:
Devoted to the advancement of accounting knowledge, it provides a forum for the publication of high quality accounting research manuscripts. The journal acknowledges its European origins and the distinctive variety of the European accounting research community. Conscious of these origins, European Accounting Review emphasises openness and flexibility, not only regarding the substantive issues of accounting research, but also with respect to paradigms, methodologies and styles of conducting that research. Though European Accounting Review is a truly international journal, it also holds a unique position as it is the only accounting journal to provide a European forum for the reporting of accounting research.