Morphological data indicate the subspecies of Leionema elatius (Rutaceae) are not conspecific and both should be treated as species.

IF 0.5 4区生物学 Q4 PLANT SCIENCES Telopea Pub Date : 2020-12-16 DOI:10.7751/TELOPEA14433

I. Telford, J. Bruhl

引用次数: 1

Abstract

Morphological data show that the two subspecies currently assigned to Leionema elatius (Benth.) Paul G.Wilson (Rutaceae), namely L. elatius subsp. elatius and L. elatius subsp. beckleri (F.Muell.) Paul G.Wilson, are not conspecific and both should be treated as species. Leionema elatius subsp. beckleri is reinstated to the rank of species as L. beckleri (F.Muell.) I.Telford & J.J.Bruhl. The distributions of both species are mapped and their conservation status discussed. Images comparing the morphological attributes of the two species and a table comparing selected attributes of the species and the newly described L. praetermissum P.R.Alvarez & Duretto are presented. Modifications to a key to species of Leionema found in New South Wales and southeastern Queensland are provided.

查看原文

微信好友朋友圈 QQ好友复制链接

本刊更多论文

形态学资料表明，龙舌兰属(芸香科)的亚种不具有同源性，两者应被视为种。

形态学资料表明，这两个亚种目前归属于Leionema elatius (Benth.)保罗·g·威尔逊(芸香科)，即乳杆菌亚种。elatius和L. elatius subsp。beckleri (F.Muell)。保罗·g·威尔逊，并不是同一物种，两者都应被视为物种。狮子座关系子。贝克莱菌被恢复到物种的等级为贝克莱菌(F.Muell)。特尔福德和布鲁尔。绘制了这两个物种的分布图，并讨论了它们的保护状况。比较了两个物种的形态属性的图像和比较了该物种和新描述的L. praetermissum P.R.Alvarez & Duretto的选择属性的表。在新南威尔士州和昆士兰州东南部发现的Leionema物种的一个关键的修改提供。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

求助全文

约1分钟内获得全文去求助

来源期刊

Telopea PLANT SCIENCES-

CiteScore

1.30

自引率

42.90%

发文量

期刊介绍： Manuscripts submitted for publication in TELOPEA are published online, after peer review and acceptance by the TELOPEA Editorial Committee and when final editorial formatting has been completed. The journal specialises in plant systematics and phylogeny. The geographic scope of the journal encompasses Australia, Malesia, Melanesia, Micronesia, and Polynesia. The suitability of a work for the journal depends on the topic and the region of origin, generally the narrower the focus of the manuscript the closer to New South Wales must be its geographic focus. As a general guide, we will consider: 1) revisionary treatments and other substantial bodies of work from any of the regions mentioned above. 2) new species from any Australian state. 3) new country records for Australia from any state. 4) new state records from New South Wales only. However, we aim to support botanical research across the broader Australasian and Pacific region, and will consider submissions on their merit. Generally we will not consider extraterritorial new country records, or single lectotypification papers unless they pertain to New South Wales taxa, or have significant bearing on the Australian flora.