Citizenship and democratic education in the time of rising nationalism: Implications for citizenship education from the cases of Australia and Singapore

Q3 Social Sciences Citizenship Teaching and Learning Pub Date : 2021-10-01 DOI:10.1386/ctl_00071_1
J. Neoh
{"title":"Citizenship and democratic education in the time of rising nationalism: Implications for citizenship education from the cases of Australia and Singapore","authors":"J. Neoh","doi":"10.1386/ctl_00071_1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Notions of citizenship and citizenship education that were traditionally related to mainly nation-centric agendas are increasingly inadequate in preparing young citizens for the dynamism of societies and complexities of social issues stimulated by globalization. Depending on the political\n and social ideologies within and across societies, different citizenship education curricula are designed differently to achieve these goals. This article uses the cases of Australia and Singapore to discuss how different forms of citizenship education can contribute to an ongoing construction\n of a more just and peaceful world. Through the analysis of the social science curricula in the two countries, three key factors that can influence the value of democratic citizenship education in developing ‘active’ and ‘informed’ citizens were identified. First, the\n extent to which democratic values are referenced as the basis for citizenship, hence supporting an understanding of ‘politics’ in contexts of diversity. Second, the balance to be sought between development of competencies to achieve nationalistic goals and responding effectively\n to the dynamism of contemporary societies. Third, the extent to which curriculum arrangements support democratic citizenship development.","PeriodicalId":38020,"journal":{"name":"Citizenship Teaching and Learning","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Citizenship Teaching and Learning","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1386/ctl_00071_1","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Notions of citizenship and citizenship education that were traditionally related to mainly nation-centric agendas are increasingly inadequate in preparing young citizens for the dynamism of societies and complexities of social issues stimulated by globalization. Depending on the political and social ideologies within and across societies, different citizenship education curricula are designed differently to achieve these goals. This article uses the cases of Australia and Singapore to discuss how different forms of citizenship education can contribute to an ongoing construction of a more just and peaceful world. Through the analysis of the social science curricula in the two countries, three key factors that can influence the value of democratic citizenship education in developing ‘active’ and ‘informed’ citizens were identified. First, the extent to which democratic values are referenced as the basis for citizenship, hence supporting an understanding of ‘politics’ in contexts of diversity. Second, the balance to be sought between development of competencies to achieve nationalistic goals and responding effectively to the dynamism of contemporary societies. Third, the extent to which curriculum arrangements support democratic citizenship development.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
民族主义兴起时期的公民与民主教育:以澳大利亚和新加坡为例对公民教育的启示
传统上主要与以国家为中心的议程有关的公民权和公民权教育的概念越来越不足以使年轻公民为全球化所激发的社会活力和社会问题的复杂性做好准备。根据社会内部和跨社会的政治和社会意识形态,不同的公民教育课程设计不同,以实现这些目标。本文以澳大利亚和新加坡为例,探讨不同形式的公民教育如何为建设一个更加公正与和平的世界做出贡献。通过对两国社会科学课程的分析,确定了影响民主公民教育在培养“积极”和“知情”公民方面价值的三个关键因素。首先,民主价值观在多大程度上被视为公民身份的基础,从而支持对多样性背景下的“政治”的理解。第二,在发展实现民族主义目标的能力和对当代社会的活力作出有效反应之间寻求平衡。第三,课程安排对民主公民发展的支持程度。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Citizenship Teaching and Learning
Citizenship Teaching and Learning Social Sciences-Social Sciences (all)
CiteScore
1.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
18
期刊介绍: Citizenship Teaching & Learning is published in partnership with the Children’s Identity and Citizenship in Europe Association (CiCea). Citizenship Teaching & Learning is global in scope, exploring issues of social and moral responsibility, community involvement and political literacy. It is a double-blind peer-reviewed journal that advances academic and professional understandings within a broad characterization of education, focusing on a wide range of issues including identity, diversity, equality and social justice within social, moral, political and cultural contexts.
期刊最新文献
Relationships among teachers’ emotional competences, emotional labour strategies and self-efficacy in moral and character education: A Hong Kong case Transdisciplinary reflections on the occupation of Czechoslovakia in 1968: Didactic use of the protest song in social science education Curriculum for Justice and Harmony: Deliberation, Knowledge, and Action in Social and Civic Education, Keith C. Barton And Li-Ching Ho (2022) Bilingual digital learning in teacher education: Bridge or barrier in the enhancement of shared society? Gender context matters: The hidden gender equality problem of school democracy
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1