Comparative evaluation of hydrodynamic and gas—liquid mass transfer characteristics in bubble column and airlift slurry reactors

K.H. Choi, Y. Chisti, M. Moo-Young
{"title":"Comparative evaluation of hydrodynamic and gas—liquid mass transfer characteristics in bubble column and airlift slurry reactors","authors":"K.H. Choi,&nbsp;Y. Chisti,&nbsp;M. Moo-Young","doi":"10.1016/0923-0467(96)03085-0","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Three pneumatically agitated reactors — a bubble column and two airlift devices — with identical rectangular cross-sections (0.456 m × 0.153 m), working heights (1.64 m) and equivalent gas sparging arrangements were compared in terms of the hydrodynamic and oxygen transfer performance. The two airlift reactors had identical riser-to-downcomer cross-sectional area ratios of 1.0, but differed in being sparged either in the central draft-tube or in the peripheral risers. The reactors produced comparable overall gas holdups for otherwise identical conditions in air—water or air—water—glass bead (0.069 mm particle diameter, 0%–5% (v/v) solids loading) systems. For the airlifts, irrespective of the sparging configuration or the solids loading, the same linear equation could relate the riser and the downcomer gas holdups. The velocity of the induced liquid circulation was not affected by solids loading, but the central draft-tube sparged design produced consistently higher velocities than did sparging in peripheral tubes. The bubble column had the poorest mixing performance. Complete suspension of solids occurred in all reactors in the range of superficial air velocities (0.01–0.08 m s<sup>−1</sup>) tested; however, the distribution of solids was non-uniform in the bubble column. The airlift devices achieved homogeneous distribution. The oxygen transfer capability of the three reactors was comparable, with the bubble column performing slightly better.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":101226,"journal":{"name":"The Chemical Engineering Journal and the Biochemical Engineering Journal","volume":"62 3","pages":"Pages 223-229"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1996-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/0923-0467(96)03085-0","citationCount":"61","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Chemical Engineering Journal and the Biochemical Engineering Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/0923046796030850","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 61

Abstract

Three pneumatically agitated reactors — a bubble column and two airlift devices — with identical rectangular cross-sections (0.456 m × 0.153 m), working heights (1.64 m) and equivalent gas sparging arrangements were compared in terms of the hydrodynamic and oxygen transfer performance. The two airlift reactors had identical riser-to-downcomer cross-sectional area ratios of 1.0, but differed in being sparged either in the central draft-tube or in the peripheral risers. The reactors produced comparable overall gas holdups for otherwise identical conditions in air—water or air—water—glass bead (0.069 mm particle diameter, 0%–5% (v/v) solids loading) systems. For the airlifts, irrespective of the sparging configuration or the solids loading, the same linear equation could relate the riser and the downcomer gas holdups. The velocity of the induced liquid circulation was not affected by solids loading, but the central draft-tube sparged design produced consistently higher velocities than did sparging in peripheral tubes. The bubble column had the poorest mixing performance. Complete suspension of solids occurred in all reactors in the range of superficial air velocities (0.01–0.08 m s−1) tested; however, the distribution of solids was non-uniform in the bubble column. The airlift devices achieved homogeneous distribution. The oxygen transfer capability of the three reactors was comparable, with the bubble column performing slightly better.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
气泡塔与气升浆体反应器流体动力及气液传质特性的比较评价
三个气动搅拌反应器-一个气泡塔和两个气升装置-具有相同的矩形截面(0.456 m × 0.153 m),工作高度(1.64 m)和等效气体喷射布置,在流体力学和氧气传递性能方面进行了比较。这两个气升反应器的立管与降水管的截面积比相同,均为1.0,但在中央尾水管和外围立管中进行了分散。在空气-水或空气-水-玻璃球(颗粒直径0.069 mm, 0%-5% (v/v)固体负载)系统中,反应器在其他相同条件下产生的总气含率相当。对于空运系统,无论喷射配置或固体载荷如何,同样的线性方程可以将提升管和降压管的气含率联系起来。诱导液体循环的速度不受固体载荷的影响,但中央尾水管喷射设计产生的速度始终高于外围管道的喷射设计。气泡塔的混合性能最差。在测试的表面空气速度(0.01-0.08 m s - 1)范围内,所有反应器中均发生固体完全悬浮;然而,在气泡柱中固体的分布是不均匀的。气升装置实现了均匀分布。三种反应器的氧传递能力相当,气泡塔表现稍好。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Cell surface area as a major parameter in the uptake of cadmium by unicellular green microalgae Modified PMMA monosize microbeads for glucose oxidase immobilization A new approach to evaluate kinetic parameters and mass transfer coefficients in continuous stirred tank reactors. Application to antibiotic separation An investigation into the possible effects of proteolysis on IgM enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay titres Equilibrium studies on reactive extraction of lactic acid with an amine extractant
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1