Constructing Bank of America's 2017 Mock Integrated Report: Experiment No. 3

R. Eccles, Michael P. Krzus
{"title":"Constructing Bank of America's 2017 Mock Integrated Report: Experiment No. 3","authors":"R. Eccles, Michael P. Krzus","doi":"10.2139/SSRN.3226953","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Our third integrated reporting experiment focused on the financial sector. We wanted to determine whether we could replicate our earlier work to construct an integrated report based on information that a company had provided in the public domain and whether the task would be more or less difficult and time consuming than our previous work. We also wanted to evaluate the extent to which this report would reflect the guidance in the International Integrated Reporting Council’s integrated reporting framework, capture FCLTGlobal’s 10 elements of a long-term strategy, and respond to the questions raised by the Strategic Investor Initiative in their February 2018 letter to CEOs regarding long-term plans. We selected a company in the banking and financial services sector — Bank of America Corporation. We constructed a “decent” first integrated report in about 40 hours. The report was good in its discussion of values, culture, and purpose; stakeholder engagement; human capital; governance; and risk management. Major flaws related to the depth of disclosure about long-term strategy and the absence of medium- and long-term metrics.","PeriodicalId":11689,"journal":{"name":"ERN: Commercial Banks (Topic)","volume":"30 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-08-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ERN: Commercial Banks (Topic)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/SSRN.3226953","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Our third integrated reporting experiment focused on the financial sector. We wanted to determine whether we could replicate our earlier work to construct an integrated report based on information that a company had provided in the public domain and whether the task would be more or less difficult and time consuming than our previous work. We also wanted to evaluate the extent to which this report would reflect the guidance in the International Integrated Reporting Council’s integrated reporting framework, capture FCLTGlobal’s 10 elements of a long-term strategy, and respond to the questions raised by the Strategic Investor Initiative in their February 2018 letter to CEOs regarding long-term plans. We selected a company in the banking and financial services sector — Bank of America Corporation. We constructed a “decent” first integrated report in about 40 hours. The report was good in its discussion of values, culture, and purpose; stakeholder engagement; human capital; governance; and risk management. Major flaws related to the depth of disclosure about long-term strategy and the absence of medium- and long-term metrics.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
构建美国银行2017年模拟综合报告:实验3
我们的第三个综合报告实验集中在金融部门。我们想确定我们是否可以复制我们之前的工作,根据公司在公共领域提供的信息构建一个集成报告,以及这项任务是否比我们之前的工作更困难或更耗时。我们还想评估这份报告在多大程度上反映了国际综合报告委员会综合报告框架中的指导意见,抓住FCLTGlobal长期战略的10个要素,并回应战略投资者倡议组织在2018年2月致首席执行官的长期计划信函中提出的问题。我们选择了一家银行和金融服务领域的公司——美国银行公司。我们在大约40个小时内构建了一份“体面”的第一份综合报告。报告对价值观、文化和目的的讨论很好;利益相关者的参与;人力资本;治理;还有风险管理。主要缺陷与长期战略披露的深度和中长期指标的缺失有关。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Banks’ Interest Rate Setting and Transitions between Liquidity Surplus and Deficit ECB Monetary Policy and Bank Default Risk Bank Regulation and Market Discipline in the Presence of Risk-Shifting Incentives 'Negative-For-Long' Interest Rates and Customer Deposit Rate Anticipatory effects around proposed regulation: Evidence from Basel III
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1