COVID-19 and mental health of individuals with different personalities

E. Proto, A. Zhang
{"title":"COVID-19 and mental health of individuals with different personalities","authors":"E. Proto, A. Zhang","doi":"10.1101/2021.05.24.21257581","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Significance Analyzing how personality affects mental health deterioration during the COVID-19 pandemic is important because it can lead to more personalized psychological or psychiatric treatments. Drawing on a longitudinal dataset representative of the UK population before and during the pandemic, we document that personality can be an important factor. In particular, agreeableness is a negative predictor, while openness and, to a lower extent, extraversion are positive predictors; the effect of neuroticism is surprisingly weak. In female respondents, cognitive skills and openness, and in non-British White respondents, extraversion and openness are particularly strong predictors of mental health deterioration. The fact that neuroticism has an effect that is weaker than expected represents an interesting puzzle. Several studies have been devoted to establishing the effects of the COVID-19 pandemic on mental health across gender, age, and ethnicity. However, much less attention has been paid to the differential effect of COVID-19 according to different personalities. We do this using the UK Household Longitudinal Study (UKHLS), a large-scale panel survey representative of the UK population. The UKHLS allows us to assess the mental health of the same respondent before and during the COVID-19 period based on their “Big Five” personality traits and cognitive skills. We find that during the COVID-19 period, individuals who have more extravert and open personality traits report a higher mental health deterioration, while those scoring higher in agreeableness are less affected. The effect of openness is particularly strong: One more SD predicts up to 0.23 more symptoms of mental health deterioration in the 12-item General Health Questionnaire (GHQ-12) test during the COVID-19 period. In particular, for females, cognitive skills and openness are strong predictors of mental health deterioration, while for non-British White respondents, these predictors are extraversion and openness. Neuroticism strongly predicts worse mental health cross-sectionally, but it does not lead to significantly stronger deterioration during the pandemic. The study’s results are robust to the inclusion of potential confounding variables such as changes in physical health, household income, and job status (like unemployed or furloughed).","PeriodicalId":20595,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences","volume":"36 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-05-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"39","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1101/2021.05.24.21257581","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 39

Abstract

Significance Analyzing how personality affects mental health deterioration during the COVID-19 pandemic is important because it can lead to more personalized psychological or psychiatric treatments. Drawing on a longitudinal dataset representative of the UK population before and during the pandemic, we document that personality can be an important factor. In particular, agreeableness is a negative predictor, while openness and, to a lower extent, extraversion are positive predictors; the effect of neuroticism is surprisingly weak. In female respondents, cognitive skills and openness, and in non-British White respondents, extraversion and openness are particularly strong predictors of mental health deterioration. The fact that neuroticism has an effect that is weaker than expected represents an interesting puzzle. Several studies have been devoted to establishing the effects of the COVID-19 pandemic on mental health across gender, age, and ethnicity. However, much less attention has been paid to the differential effect of COVID-19 according to different personalities. We do this using the UK Household Longitudinal Study (UKHLS), a large-scale panel survey representative of the UK population. The UKHLS allows us to assess the mental health of the same respondent before and during the COVID-19 period based on their “Big Five” personality traits and cognitive skills. We find that during the COVID-19 period, individuals who have more extravert and open personality traits report a higher mental health deterioration, while those scoring higher in agreeableness are less affected. The effect of openness is particularly strong: One more SD predicts up to 0.23 more symptoms of mental health deterioration in the 12-item General Health Questionnaire (GHQ-12) test during the COVID-19 period. In particular, for females, cognitive skills and openness are strong predictors of mental health deterioration, while for non-British White respondents, these predictors are extraversion and openness. Neuroticism strongly predicts worse mental health cross-sectionally, but it does not lead to significantly stronger deterioration during the pandemic. The study’s results are robust to the inclusion of potential confounding variables such as changes in physical health, household income, and job status (like unemployed or furloughed).
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
COVID-19与不同人格个体的心理健康
分析个性如何影响COVID-19大流行期间的心理健康恶化很重要,因为它可以导致更个性化的心理或精神治疗。根据大流行之前和期间代表英国人口的纵向数据集,我们记录了个性可能是一个重要因素。特别是,宜人性是一个负面预测因素,而开放性和较低程度的外向性是积极预测因素;神经质的影响出奇地弱。在女性受访者中,认知技能和开放性,以及在非英国白人受访者中,外向性和开放性是心理健康恶化的强烈预测因素。事实上,神经质的影响比预期的要弱,这是一个有趣的谜题。有几项研究致力于确定COVID-19大流行对性别、年龄和种族心理健康的影响。然而,人们对不同性格对新冠病毒的不同影响的关注却很少。我们使用英国家庭纵向研究(UKHLS),这是一项代表英国人口的大规模小组调查。UKHLS允许我们根据同一受访者的“五大”人格特征和认知技能,评估他们在2019冠状病毒病之前和期间的心理健康状况。我们发现,在COVID-19期间,性格外向和开放的个体报告的心理健康状况恶化程度更高,而随和程度较高的个体受影响较小。开放性的影响尤其强烈:在COVID-19期间,在12项一般健康问卷(GHQ-12)测试中,每增加一个标准差,就会多出现0.23个心理健康恶化症状。特别是,对于女性来说,认知技能和开放性是心理健康恶化的有力预测因素,而对于非英国白人受访者来说,这些预测因素是外向性和开放性。神经质在横断面上强有力地预示着更差的精神健康状况,但在大流行期间,它不会导致明显更严重的恶化。这项研究的结果对于包括身体健康、家庭收入和工作状态(如失业或休假)等潜在混杂变量的影响是稳健的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Tropical paleobiology discovers biodiversity in a warmer past Correction to Supporting Information for Wiedmann et al., The material footprint of nations FireCCILT11 artifacts may confound the link between biomass burning and infant mortality Reply to Giglio and Roy: Aggregate infant mortality estimates robust to choice of burned area product Structural origins of Escherichia coli RNA polymerase open promoter complex stability
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1