Quality of Antenatal Care and its Determinants in the Urban-Rural Environment of Kamina, Democratic Republic of the Congo

IF 0.1 Q4 OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY Journal of Clinical Obstetrics and Gynecology Pub Date : 2023-07-28 DOI:10.29328/journal.cjog.1001136
Kangulu Ignace Bwana, Moyambe Jules Ngwe Thaba, Nzaji Michel Kabamba, Kibibi Ange Assumani, Kazadi Alain Mbayo, Umba Elie Kilolo Ngoy, Lumbule John Ngoy, Zongwe Eric Kiwele, Kalume Xavier Kinenkinda, A'Nkoy Albert Mwembo Tambwe, Sakatolo Jean Baptiste Kakoma
{"title":"Quality of Antenatal Care and its Determinants in the Urban-Rural Environment of Kamina, Democratic Republic of the Congo","authors":"Kangulu Ignace Bwana, Moyambe Jules Ngwe Thaba, Nzaji Michel Kabamba, Kibibi Ange Assumani, Kazadi Alain Mbayo, Umba Elie Kilolo Ngoy, Lumbule John Ngoy, Zongwe Eric Kiwele, Kalume Xavier Kinenkinda, A'Nkoy Albert Mwembo Tambwe, Sakatolo Jean Baptiste Kakoma","doi":"10.29328/journal.cjog.1001136","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Introduction: Every woman should receive quality antenatal care during pregnancy wherever she lives. We carried out this research with the objective of evaluating the quality of antenatal consultations (ANC) in terms of periodicity, screening, and prophylaxis interventions during antenatal consultations in Kamina and to identify the determinants associated with inadequate ANC. Material and methods: This was a descriptive and analytical cross-sectional study carried out in 6 health facilities in Kamina over a period of 17 months with 476 women who had given birth having attended antenatal consultations at least once. A scoring grid of periodicity standards, screening, and prophylactic interventions with a score of 40 was used to qualify the ANC as adequate. Logistic regression was performed to identify the determinants of inadequate ANC. Results: 40.3% of mothers had reached at least 4 antenatal visits (3.4±1.36); 21.2% had started the ANC no later than 16 weeks for an average age of 22.8 weeks ± 6.19. Overall, 72.5% of pregnant women had benefited from ANC qualified as inadequate. After adjustment, the determinants of inadequate ANC were multigestity (aOR=1.86[1.08-3.19]), low level of education of the mother (aOR=3.93; 95% CI=[2, 08-7.42]), and attendance at a first-level health facility (aOR=3.22; 95% CI=[2.06-5.05]. Conclusion: In the majority of cases, the ANC received by pregnant women in Kamina is inadequate. The determinants thus identified should serve the actors to direct the means to improve the quality of antenatal care in Kamina.","PeriodicalId":36268,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Clinical Obstetrics and Gynecology","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.1000,"publicationDate":"2023-07-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Clinical Obstetrics and Gynecology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.29328/journal.cjog.1001136","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Every woman should receive quality antenatal care during pregnancy wherever she lives. We carried out this research with the objective of evaluating the quality of antenatal consultations (ANC) in terms of periodicity, screening, and prophylaxis interventions during antenatal consultations in Kamina and to identify the determinants associated with inadequate ANC. Material and methods: This was a descriptive and analytical cross-sectional study carried out in 6 health facilities in Kamina over a period of 17 months with 476 women who had given birth having attended antenatal consultations at least once. A scoring grid of periodicity standards, screening, and prophylactic interventions with a score of 40 was used to qualify the ANC as adequate. Logistic regression was performed to identify the determinants of inadequate ANC. Results: 40.3% of mothers had reached at least 4 antenatal visits (3.4±1.36); 21.2% had started the ANC no later than 16 weeks for an average age of 22.8 weeks ± 6.19. Overall, 72.5% of pregnant women had benefited from ANC qualified as inadequate. After adjustment, the determinants of inadequate ANC were multigestity (aOR=1.86[1.08-3.19]), low level of education of the mother (aOR=3.93; 95% CI=[2, 08-7.42]), and attendance at a first-level health facility (aOR=3.22; 95% CI=[2.06-5.05]. Conclusion: In the majority of cases, the ANC received by pregnant women in Kamina is inadequate. The determinants thus identified should serve the actors to direct the means to improve the quality of antenatal care in Kamina.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
刚果民主共和国卡米纳城乡环境中的产前保健质量及其决定因素
导言:无论生活在何处,每个妇女在怀孕期间都应得到高质量的产前保健。我们开展这项研究的目的是评估卡米纳产前咨询(ANC)的质量,包括定期、筛查和预防性干预措施,并确定与ANC不足相关的决定因素。材料和方法:这是一项描述性和分析性横断面研究,在卡米纳的6个卫生机构进行,为期17个月,对476名至少参加过一次产前咨询的分娩妇女进行了调查。采用周期性标准、筛查和预防性干预的评分网格,得分为40分,以确定ANC是否足够。进行逻辑回归以确定ANC不足的决定因素。结果:40.3%的产妇至少进行了4次产前检查(3.4±1.36)次);21.2%的患者不迟于16周开始ANC,平均年龄为22.8周±6.19周。总体而言,72.5%的孕妇受益于ANC,但被认为是不足的。调整后,多胎性(aOR=1.86[1.08-3.19])、母亲受教育程度低(aOR=3.93;95% CI=[2,08 -7.42]),以及在一级卫生机构就诊(aOR=3.22;95% CI =(2.06 - -5.05)。结论:在大多数情况下,卡米纳孕妇接受的ANC不足。由此确定的决定因素应有助于行为者指导提高卡米纳产前保健质量的手段。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Clinical Obstetrics and Gynecology
Journal of Clinical Obstetrics and Gynecology Medicine-Obstetrics and Gynecology
CiteScore
0.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
8
期刊最新文献
Management of Congenital Cervical Teratoma with Application of EXIT Protocol - Case Report Reverse Breech Extraction versus Vaginal Push before Uterine Incision during Cesarean Section with Fully Dilated Cervix and Impacted Fetal Head Postdate Pregnancy Maternal and Fetal Outcomes among Sudanese Women Age as a Predictor of Time to Response for Patients Undergoing Medical Management of Endometrial Cancer Ectopic Pregnancy Risk Factors Presentation and Management Outcomes
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1