Clinical and functional outcomes of early reconstruction of the collateral ligaments and delayed reconstruction of the cruciate ligaments in multi-ligament knee injury; a prospective, cross-sectional study

IF 0.2 Q4 EMERGENCY MEDICINE Trauma monthly Pub Date : 2020-01-01 DOI:10.30491/TM.2020.213789.1033
M. Okhovatpour, R. Zandi, mohammdreza minatoorsajadi, A. Ebrahimpour, meisam jafari kafi abadi
{"title":"Clinical and functional outcomes of early reconstruction of the collateral ligaments and delayed reconstruction of the cruciate ligaments in multi-ligament knee injury; a prospective, cross-sectional study","authors":"M. Okhovatpour, R. Zandi, mohammdreza minatoorsajadi, A. Ebrahimpour, meisam jafari kafi abadi","doi":"10.30491/TM.2020.213789.1033","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Multi-ligament knee injury is common after knee dislocation. There are different approaches for treating multi-ligament knee injuries; however, choosing the best approach is a challenging issue. Objectives: This study aimed to investigate the efficacy of early reconstruction of collateral ligaments and delayed reconstruction of cruciate ligaments in multi-ligament knee injury. Methods: In this prospective study, 24 patients who had a grade 3 tear in one collateral ligament in addition to tears in two other knee ligaments were enrolled. At the first stage, collateral ligaments were reconstructed; after the patient gained full range of motion, reconstruction was done for the cruciate ligaments. Patients were followed-up for one year and postoperative evaluations were conducted through clinical tests, International Knee Documentation Committee scores, and Lysholm scales. Results: Twenty-four patients were entered into the final analysis. Synchronous injury of anterior cruciate ligament, posterior cruciate ligament, medial collateral ligament, posterior oblique ligament, posterolateral corner, and lateral collateral ligament had the highest frequency (37.5%). At the one-year follow-up, the average Lysholm and IKDC scores were 86.4 ± 3.5 and 83.8 ± 4, respectively. Range of motion was normal in all patients at the end of the study. Furthermore, in varus and valgus stress tests, the outcomes of reconstruction were better on the lateral side of the knee than on the medial side. Conclusion: The results revealed that a two-stage surgery consisting of early reconstruction of collateral ligaments and delayed reconstruction of cruciate ligaments have good clinical and functional outcomes in multi-ligament knee injuries.","PeriodicalId":23249,"journal":{"name":"Trauma monthly","volume":"81 1","pages":"14-19"},"PeriodicalIF":0.2000,"publicationDate":"2020-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Trauma monthly","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.30491/TM.2020.213789.1033","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"EMERGENCY MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Multi-ligament knee injury is common after knee dislocation. There are different approaches for treating multi-ligament knee injuries; however, choosing the best approach is a challenging issue. Objectives: This study aimed to investigate the efficacy of early reconstruction of collateral ligaments and delayed reconstruction of cruciate ligaments in multi-ligament knee injury. Methods: In this prospective study, 24 patients who had a grade 3 tear in one collateral ligament in addition to tears in two other knee ligaments were enrolled. At the first stage, collateral ligaments were reconstructed; after the patient gained full range of motion, reconstruction was done for the cruciate ligaments. Patients were followed-up for one year and postoperative evaluations were conducted through clinical tests, International Knee Documentation Committee scores, and Lysholm scales. Results: Twenty-four patients were entered into the final analysis. Synchronous injury of anterior cruciate ligament, posterior cruciate ligament, medial collateral ligament, posterior oblique ligament, posterolateral corner, and lateral collateral ligament had the highest frequency (37.5%). At the one-year follow-up, the average Lysholm and IKDC scores were 86.4 ± 3.5 and 83.8 ± 4, respectively. Range of motion was normal in all patients at the end of the study. Furthermore, in varus and valgus stress tests, the outcomes of reconstruction were better on the lateral side of the knee than on the medial side. Conclusion: The results revealed that a two-stage surgery consisting of early reconstruction of collateral ligaments and delayed reconstruction of cruciate ligaments have good clinical and functional outcomes in multi-ligament knee injuries.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
膝关节多韧带损伤早期副韧带重建和延迟交叉韧带重建的临床和功能效果前瞻性横断面研究
背景:膝关节脱位后多韧带损伤是常见的。治疗膝关节多韧带损伤有不同的方法;然而,选择最好的方法是一个具有挑战性的问题。目的:探讨膝关节多韧带损伤早期副韧带重建和延迟交叉韧带重建的疗效。方法:在这项前瞻性研究中,研究人员招募了24名一侧副韧带3级撕裂以及另外两条膝关节韧带撕裂的患者。第一阶段重建副韧带;在患者获得完全活动范围后,对交叉韧带进行重建。患者随访一年,术后通过临床试验、国际膝关节文献委员会评分和Lysholm量表进行评估。结果:24例患者进入最终分析。前交叉韧带、后交叉韧带、内侧副韧带、后斜韧带、后外侧角、外侧副韧带同步损伤发生率最高(37.5%)。在一年的随访中,Lysholm和IKDC的平均得分分别为86.4±3.5和83.8±4。在研究结束时,所有患者的活动范围正常。此外,在内翻和外翻应力测试中,膝关节外侧重建的结果优于内侧重建。结论:早期副韧带重建和延迟交叉韧带重建两阶段手术治疗膝关节多韧带损伤具有良好的临床和功能效果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Trauma monthly
Trauma monthly EMERGENCY MEDICINE-
CiteScore
0.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Anatomical Dimensions of the Anterior Column of the Acetabulum with Imaging Criteria in Patients with Surgical Acetabular Fractures Mortality Prediction in Multiple Trauma Patients Using GAP, RTS and NTS Models The effect of Pregabalin on morphine consumption, sleep, mood and ability to change position after colorectal cancer surgery Titanium Elastic Nailing System, An Effective Way Of Pediatric Forearm Fracture Management Diagnostic Salivary Biomarkers in Traumatic Brain Injury
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1