Informative value of an indirect enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) for the detection of bovine viral diarrhoea virus (BVDV) antibodies in milk.

F. Beaudeau, C. Belloc, H. Seegers, S. Assié, P. Pourquier, A. Joly
{"title":"Informative value of an indirect enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) for the detection of bovine viral diarrhoea virus (BVDV) antibodies in milk.","authors":"F. Beaudeau, C. Belloc, H. Seegers, S. Assié, P. Pourquier, A. Joly","doi":"10.1046/J.1439-0450.2001.00497.X","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Bulk and individual milk samples from 117 herds located in Brittany (west France) were used to assess: (i) the performance characteristics of an indirect enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) applied to individual milk for the detection of antibodies to bovine viral diarrhoea virus (BVDV); and (ii) the relationship between the bulk milk result obtained from this test and the within-herd prevalence of antibody-positive lactating cows. This ELISA test was based on a monoclonal antibody directed against non-structural protein NS2-3 of pestiviruses. At the individual level, based on 1113 matched milk/serum samples, the sensitivity and specificity of this test applied to milk, compared with the virus neutralization test on serum, were 95.0 and 97.7%, respectively. At the herd level, the relationship between the optical density percentage (OD%) of bulk milk and the within-herd prevalence of antibody-positive lactating cows was assessed using the receiver operating characteristics (ROC) analysis. Classes of OD% of bulk milk were determined so that they were associated with minimum intraclass and maximum between-class variances of within-herd prevalence of antibody-positive cows. The ROC analysis resulted in two classes of bulk milk results corresponding to different expected levels of within-herd prevalence. Herds with an OD% of bulk milk < 75% and > or = 75% had a mean observed prevalence of antibody-positive cows of 8.9 and 60.6%, respectively. Herds with a bulk milk result < 75% were expected to be BVDV free, whereas large variations in prevalence of antibody-positive cows existed in the herds with OD% > or = 75%. The test described in this study is suitable to identify herds likely to have a low prevalence of BVDV antibody-positive cows.","PeriodicalId":17659,"journal":{"name":"Journal of veterinary medicine. B, Infectious diseases and veterinary public health","volume":"5 1","pages":"705-12"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2001-11-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"19","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of veterinary medicine. B, Infectious diseases and veterinary public health","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1046/J.1439-0450.2001.00497.X","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 19

Abstract

Bulk and individual milk samples from 117 herds located in Brittany (west France) were used to assess: (i) the performance characteristics of an indirect enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) applied to individual milk for the detection of antibodies to bovine viral diarrhoea virus (BVDV); and (ii) the relationship between the bulk milk result obtained from this test and the within-herd prevalence of antibody-positive lactating cows. This ELISA test was based on a monoclonal antibody directed against non-structural protein NS2-3 of pestiviruses. At the individual level, based on 1113 matched milk/serum samples, the sensitivity and specificity of this test applied to milk, compared with the virus neutralization test on serum, were 95.0 and 97.7%, respectively. At the herd level, the relationship between the optical density percentage (OD%) of bulk milk and the within-herd prevalence of antibody-positive lactating cows was assessed using the receiver operating characteristics (ROC) analysis. Classes of OD% of bulk milk were determined so that they were associated with minimum intraclass and maximum between-class variances of within-herd prevalence of antibody-positive cows. The ROC analysis resulted in two classes of bulk milk results corresponding to different expected levels of within-herd prevalence. Herds with an OD% of bulk milk < 75% and > or = 75% had a mean observed prevalence of antibody-positive cows of 8.9 and 60.6%, respectively. Herds with a bulk milk result < 75% were expected to be BVDV free, whereas large variations in prevalence of antibody-positive cows existed in the herds with OD% > or = 75%. The test described in this study is suitable to identify herds likely to have a low prevalence of BVDV antibody-positive cows.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
间接酶联免疫吸附试验(ELISA)检测牛奶中牛病毒性腹泻病毒(BVDV)抗体的信息价值。
来自布列塔尼(法国西部)117个畜群的散装和单个牛奶样本用于评估:(i)用于检测牛病毒性腹泻病毒(BVDV)抗体的用于单个牛奶的间接酶联免疫吸附试验(ELISA)的性能特征;(ii)从该测试中获得的散装牛奶结果与牛群内抗体阳性的泌乳奶牛流行率之间的关系。该酶联免疫吸附试验基于一种针对鼠疫病毒非结构蛋白NS2-3的单克隆抗体。在个体水平上,基于1113份匹配的牛奶/血清样本,与血清病毒中和试验相比,该试验对牛奶的敏感性和特异性分别为95.0和97.7%。在牛群水平上,采用接受者工作特征(ROC)分析,评估散装奶光密度百分比(OD%)与奶牛群内抗体阳性发生率之间的关系。确定了散装牛奶OD%的等级,使其与抗体阳性奶牛群内流行率的最小类内方差和最大类间方差相关。ROC分析得出两类散装牛奶的结果,对应于不同的预期水平的群内流行率。散乳OD% < 75%和>或= 75%的牛群,抗体阳性奶牛的平均患病率分别为8.9%和60.6%。产奶量< 75%的奶牛被认为是无BVDV的,而产奶量>或= 75%的奶牛抗体阳性的流行率差异很大。本研究中描述的测试适用于确定BVDV抗体阳性奶牛可能低流行率的牛群。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Keratoconjunctivitis and periorbital papillomatosis associated with heavy periorbital infestation by the tail louse Haematopinus quadripertusus in heifers. Comparative study of PCR as a direct assay and ELISA and AGID as indirect assays for the detection of bovine leukaemia virus. Histopathological and immunohistochemical study of lambs experimentally infected with Fasciola hepatica and Schistosoma bovis. Use of polymerase chain reaction to identify Brucella abortus strain RB51 among Brucella field isolates from cattle in Italy. Use of monoclonal antibodies in blocking ELISA detection of transmissible gastroenteritis virus in faeces of piglets.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1