Place, power and leadership: Insights from mayoral governance and leadership innovation in Bristol, UK

R. Hambleton, D. Sweeting, Thomas Oliver
{"title":"Place, power and leadership: Insights from mayoral governance and leadership innovation in Bristol, UK","authors":"R. Hambleton, D. Sweeting, Thomas Oliver","doi":"10.1177/17427150211028122","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This article aims to enhance understanding of the role of place in urban leadership by examining the way leadership changed significantly following the introduction of mayoral governance into a UK city. In 2012, 10 cities in England held referendums to decide whether to introduce a directly elected mayor model of leadership. Bristol was the only city to vote in favour of this radical change, and the Bristol Civic Leadership Project, set up before the first mayor was elected in November 2012, was designed to discover what differences the directly elected mayor model might make to the leadership and governance of a city. This article addresses two important questions: (1) Does the institutional design of local governance in a place influence leadership effectiveness? (2) How, if at all, do the leadership styles of the individual elected as mayor affect the quality of place-based governance? The article identifies three main reasons why place is important in public policy – expression of identity, strengthening democracy and enhancing governmental effectiveness – and considers how the leadership innovations in Bristol engage with these three dimensions of place. As well as presenting evidence documenting how bold civic leadership has transformed the governance of a particular British city, the article contributes to leadership studies by exploring the relationships between place, power and leadership.","PeriodicalId":92094,"journal":{"name":"Leadership (London)","volume":"22 1","pages":"81 - 101"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-06-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"6","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Leadership (London)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/17427150211028122","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 6

Abstract

This article aims to enhance understanding of the role of place in urban leadership by examining the way leadership changed significantly following the introduction of mayoral governance into a UK city. In 2012, 10 cities in England held referendums to decide whether to introduce a directly elected mayor model of leadership. Bristol was the only city to vote in favour of this radical change, and the Bristol Civic Leadership Project, set up before the first mayor was elected in November 2012, was designed to discover what differences the directly elected mayor model might make to the leadership and governance of a city. This article addresses two important questions: (1) Does the institutional design of local governance in a place influence leadership effectiveness? (2) How, if at all, do the leadership styles of the individual elected as mayor affect the quality of place-based governance? The article identifies three main reasons why place is important in public policy – expression of identity, strengthening democracy and enhancing governmental effectiveness – and considers how the leadership innovations in Bristol engage with these three dimensions of place. As well as presenting evidence documenting how bold civic leadership has transformed the governance of a particular British city, the article contributes to leadership studies by exploring the relationships between place, power and leadership.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
地点、权力和领导力:来自英国布里斯托尔市长治理和领导力创新的见解
本文旨在通过研究英国城市引入市长治理后领导方式的显著变化,提高对城市领导中地方作用的理解。2012年,英国的10个城市举行了全民公投,决定是否引入直选市长的领导模式。布里斯托尔是唯一一个投票支持这一激进变革的城市,而在2012年11月首任市长当选之前设立的布里斯托尔公民领导项目(Bristol Civic Leadership Project),旨在发现直选市长模式可能对城市的领导和治理产生的影响。本文解决了两个重要问题:(1)地方治理的制度设计是否影响领导效能?(2)如果有的话,当选市长的个人的领导风格是如何影响地方治理的质量的?本文确定了地方在公共政策中重要的三个主要原因——表达身份、加强民主和提高政府效率——并考虑了布里斯托尔的领导创新如何与这三个地方维度相结合。除了展示大胆的公民领导如何改变了一个特定英国城市的治理的证据外,这篇文章还通过探索地点、权力和领导之间的关系,为领导力研究做出了贡献。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Examining employee willingness to execute shared leadership: The role of leadership behaviour, gender, age, and context Leading like lions: The model junior officer in the Great War and a critique of present-day mainstream leadership models Imagining aesthetic leadership Letter to Putin Leadership and systems change. The 21st International Studying Leadership Conference 31st July 2023. Call for proposals
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1