The memory of judgment: The Holocaust, witnesses and mediocrity in William Gass’s Middle C

IF 2 Q1 LINGUISTICS International Journal of Legal Discourse Pub Date : 2019-09-01 DOI:10.1515/ijld-2019-2021
F. Fang, Zhixiang Gao
{"title":"The memory of judgment: The Holocaust, witnesses and mediocrity in William Gass’s Middle C","authors":"F. Fang, Zhixiang Gao","doi":"10.1515/ijld-2019-2021","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract The memory of judgment and the Holocaust is of great interest in postmodernists’ writings. The relationship between postmodernism and the Holocaust is always paradoxically juxtaposed. William Gass, an American postmodern writer and critic, touches the topic of the Holocaust in his masterpiece Middle C (2013). Gass tends to trivialize fascism to every man and every ordinary life, to disrespect the “sacred”. The novel has the skill in faking the identity or the details of its putative history. Is the Holocaust a subcategory of war crimes or the inhumanity of genocide? Is there any reliable way of establishing the reality of the Holocaust either through the memory of groups or individuals? Are genocide and occasional or no systematic atrocities the inevitability of a state? In this paper, we tend to explore the collective memory and individual memory of witnesses of the Holocaust presented in Middle C and the puzzlement of judgment as a war crime or inhuman genocide, thus arguing the ethos of history and shock of mediocrity in our daily life.","PeriodicalId":55934,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Legal Discourse","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Legal Discourse","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1515/ijld-2019-2021","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"LINGUISTICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Abstract The memory of judgment and the Holocaust is of great interest in postmodernists’ writings. The relationship between postmodernism and the Holocaust is always paradoxically juxtaposed. William Gass, an American postmodern writer and critic, touches the topic of the Holocaust in his masterpiece Middle C (2013). Gass tends to trivialize fascism to every man and every ordinary life, to disrespect the “sacred”. The novel has the skill in faking the identity or the details of its putative history. Is the Holocaust a subcategory of war crimes or the inhumanity of genocide? Is there any reliable way of establishing the reality of the Holocaust either through the memory of groups or individuals? Are genocide and occasional or no systematic atrocities the inevitability of a state? In this paper, we tend to explore the collective memory and individual memory of witnesses of the Holocaust presented in Middle C and the puzzlement of judgment as a war crime or inhuman genocide, thus arguing the ethos of history and shock of mediocrity in our daily life.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
审判的记忆:威廉·加斯的《中C》中的大屠杀、目击者和平庸
对审判和大屠杀的记忆是后现代主义写作的一个重要内容。后现代主义和大屠杀之间的关系总是自相矛盾地并列在一起。美国后现代作家、评论家威廉·加斯在他的代表作《中C》(2013)中触及了大屠杀的话题。格拉斯倾向于将法西斯主义贬低为每个人和每一个普通的生命,不尊重“神圣”。小说在虚构人物身份或虚构历史细节方面很有技巧。大屠杀是战争罪的子类还是种族灭绝的非人道?是否有任何可靠的方法可以通过群体或个人的记忆来确定大屠杀的真实性?种族灭绝和偶尔或没有系统的暴行是一个国家不可避免的吗?在本文中,我们倾向于探索中世纪大屠杀目击者的集体记忆和个人记忆,以及作为战争罪或不人道的种族灭绝判断的困惑,从而争论历史的精神和平庸的冲击在我们的日常生活中。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.00
自引率
80.00%
发文量
10
期刊最新文献
The de-legitimation of Machine Learning Algorithms (MLAs) in “The Social Dilemma” (2020): a post-digital cognitive-stylistic approach Language ideologies and speaker categorization: a case study from the U.S. legal system That-complement clauses signalling stance in Nigerian Supreme Court lead judgements: a corpus-based study Discourse patterning and recursion in the EU case law Repair in Ghanaian judicial discourse
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1