Social Attitudes to Cross-Border Marriages in Korea and Taiwan

C. Chung, Keuntae Kim
{"title":"Social Attitudes to Cross-Border Marriages in Korea and Taiwan","authors":"C. Chung, Keuntae Kim","doi":"10.21588/DNS.2016.45.2.006","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This article aims to compare attitudes toward cross-border marriages in Korea and Taiwan using data from a unique questionnaire that was administered in both countries in 2007 and 2008. Moreover, this study proposes historical and political analyses alongside the conventional social quality approach, as a means of avoiding decontextualized interpretations of social development. Upon surveying indicators of social cohesion, inclusiveness, and empowerment based on a social quality framework, the results indicate that Taiwanese citizens show a lower level of social inclusiveness toward marriage migrants than Korean citizens show, though the Taiwanese show more social cohesion and empowerment than the latter. Social attitudes toward marriage migrants in the two countries imply that transnational marriages are likely to bring about various forms of social conflict, unless policies can be developed that account for the complex nature of such arrangements.","PeriodicalId":84572,"journal":{"name":"Development and society (Soul Taehakkyo. Institute for Social Devdelopment and Policy Research)","volume":"1 1","pages":"327-352"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2016-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Development and society (Soul Taehakkyo. Institute for Social Devdelopment and Policy Research)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21588/DNS.2016.45.2.006","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

This article aims to compare attitudes toward cross-border marriages in Korea and Taiwan using data from a unique questionnaire that was administered in both countries in 2007 and 2008. Moreover, this study proposes historical and political analyses alongside the conventional social quality approach, as a means of avoiding decontextualized interpretations of social development. Upon surveying indicators of social cohesion, inclusiveness, and empowerment based on a social quality framework, the results indicate that Taiwanese citizens show a lower level of social inclusiveness toward marriage migrants than Korean citizens show, though the Taiwanese show more social cohesion and empowerment than the latter. Social attitudes toward marriage migrants in the two countries imply that transnational marriages are likely to bring about various forms of social conflict, unless policies can be developed that account for the complex nature of such arrangements.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
韩国与台湾对跨国婚姻的社会态度
本文旨在比较韩国和台湾对跨国婚姻的态度,使用2007年和2008年在两国进行的独特问卷调查的数据。此外,本研究提出了历史和政治分析以及传统的社会质量方法,作为避免对社会发展进行非语境化解释的一种手段。基于社会品质框架的社会凝聚力、包容性与赋权指标调查结果显示,台湾民众对婚姻移民的社会包容程度低于韩国民众,但台湾民众对婚姻移民的社会凝聚力与赋权程度高于韩国民众。这两个国家对婚姻移民的社会态度表明,跨国婚姻很可能带来各种形式的社会冲突,除非能够制定政策来解释这种安排的复杂性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Explaining South Korea’s Diaspora Engagement Policies A Comparative Study on Two Ways of Community Building with Different Commons Ownership Modes: Focusing on the cases of Gasi-ri and Seonheul 1-ri Synergistic Interactions between Social Policy and SSEs in Developing Countries: Interfaces in Discourse and Practice * Labour protection policy in a third world economy: The case of Indonesia Arguments on Information Secrecy Made by Public Agencies in Indonesia: A Case Study in the Disputes over Access to Information, 2010-2016
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1