Insurgent peace research: affects, friendship and feminism as methods

IF 1.1 Q3 INTERNATIONAL RELATIONS Conflict Security & Development Pub Date : 2022-09-03 DOI:10.1080/14678802.2022.2122699
Priscyll Anctil Avoine
{"title":"Insurgent peace research: affects, friendship and feminism as methods","authors":"Priscyll Anctil Avoine","doi":"10.1080/14678802.2022.2122699","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT Affect and friendship change the way we think about research (epistemology) and conduct research (methodology). This article accounts for affect and friendship as feminist methods in peace research. It argues that affective feminist conversations, practices and actions through friendship can drastically modify how we think about peace. Based on fieldwork conducted in Colombia (2019 and 2022) with female ex-guerrilleras from the Revolutionary Armed Forces of Colombia – People’s Army (Farc-ep), it (1) draws upon the concepts of camaradería and being insurgent proposed by the women of the Farc-ep to (2) trace how affect and friendship can change the way we do peace research. Ultimately, the article proposes four aspects for the adoption of friendship as a method in peace research by: 1) deconstructing the linearity in peace research methods; 2) multiplying data collection’s methods; 3) including affects throughout the whole research process and 4) advocating for an insurgent peace research that vindicates long-term ‘transversal politics’ and translocal coalition-building.","PeriodicalId":46301,"journal":{"name":"Conflict Security & Development","volume":"88 1 1","pages":"435 - 455"},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2022-09-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Conflict Security & Development","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/14678802.2022.2122699","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"INTERNATIONAL RELATIONS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

ABSTRACT Affect and friendship change the way we think about research (epistemology) and conduct research (methodology). This article accounts for affect and friendship as feminist methods in peace research. It argues that affective feminist conversations, practices and actions through friendship can drastically modify how we think about peace. Based on fieldwork conducted in Colombia (2019 and 2022) with female ex-guerrilleras from the Revolutionary Armed Forces of Colombia – People’s Army (Farc-ep), it (1) draws upon the concepts of camaradería and being insurgent proposed by the women of the Farc-ep to (2) trace how affect and friendship can change the way we do peace research. Ultimately, the article proposes four aspects for the adoption of friendship as a method in peace research by: 1) deconstructing the linearity in peace research methods; 2) multiplying data collection’s methods; 3) including affects throughout the whole research process and 4) advocating for an insurgent peace research that vindicates long-term ‘transversal politics’ and translocal coalition-building.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
叛乱和平研究:以影响、友谊和女权主义为方法
情感和友谊改变了我们思考研究(认识论)和进行研究(方法论)的方式。本文论述了情感和友谊作为女性主义研究和平的方法。它认为,通过友谊进行的情感女权主义对话、实践和行动可以极大地改变我们对和平的看法。基于在哥伦比亚(2019年和2022年)与哥伦比亚革命武装力量-人民军(Farc-ep)的女性前游击队员进行的实地调查,它(1)借鉴了Farc-ep妇女提出的camaradería和叛乱的概念,(2)追踪影响和友谊如何改变我们进行和平研究的方式。最后,文章提出了在和平研究中采用友谊作为研究方法的四个方面:1)解构和平研究方法的线性;2)增加数据收集方法;3)包括整个研究过程的影响;4)倡导一项支持长期“横向政治”和跨地方联盟建设的叛乱和平研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Conflict Security & Development
Conflict Security & Development INTERNATIONAL RELATIONS-
CiteScore
2.90
自引率
7.70%
发文量
22
期刊最新文献
From snapshots to panoramas: navigating power, space, and time in the study of armed groups Natural bedfellows: corruption, criminality and the failure of international reconstruction. A case study of the Kabul Bank Elites and arbitrary power: ethical challenges and guiding principles for research with violent political actors Transitional justice interventions in Sri Lanka: why do they keep failing? ‘This is the fate of Libyan women:’ contempt, ridicule, and indifference of Seham Sergiwa
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1