Technologically-Treated Polyclonal Affinity-Purified Antibodies to the Tumor Necrosis Factor-α, Brain Specific S-100 Protein and Histamine in Treatment of Functional Dyspepsia: Results of the Multicenter, Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Trial

Y. Shulpekova, I. Maev, V. Grinevich, I. Khlynov, Y. Shvarts, V. Ivashkin
{"title":"Technologically-Treated Polyclonal Affinity-Purified Antibodies to the Tumor Necrosis Factor-α, Brain Specific S-100 Protein and Histamine in Treatment of Functional Dyspepsia: Results of the Multicenter, Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Trial","authors":"Y. Shulpekova, I. Maev, V. Grinevich, I. Khlynov, Y. Shvarts, V. Ivashkin","doi":"10.22416/1382-4376-2022-32-3-40-51","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The aim of the study was to evaluate the efficacy and safety of Kolofort® (a complex medicine containing technologically processed forms of antibodies to S-100 protein, tumor necrosis factor-α and histamine) in the management of functional dyspepsia (FD) in outpatient clinical practice.Methods: Outpatients (N = 309) at the age of 18–45 in whom FD was diagnosed according to the Rome IV criteria were enrolled in a multicenter, double-blind, placebo-controlled, randomized clinical trial. Patients were randomized in two groups receiving Kolofort® or placebo 2 tablets tid for 8 weeks. The primary endpoint of the study was a change in the FD symptoms severity score according to the Gastrointestinal symptom score (GIS) at week 8. ITT and [PP] analysis were performed.Results: at week 8 the reduction in GIS sum score was observed in Kolofort® group and placebo group (by 7.2 ± 3.3 [7.2 ± 3.4] and 6.3 ± 4.6 [6.2 ± 4.5], respectively, p = 0.041 [0.039]). The proportion of cases with GIS score reduction by ≥4 was 88,1 % [88.6 %] and 79.1 % [79.6 %] in Kolofort® group and placebo group, respectively (p = 0.046 [p = 0.051]). None of the patients in Kolofort® group had progression of FD symptoms or required additional therapy. There were 29 adverse events (AEs) recorded in 25 patients including 16 cases in 13 (8.6 %) patients in Kolofort® group and 13 AEs in 12 (7.6 %) patients in placebo group.Conclusion: the clinical trial demonstrates the positive effect of Kolofort® in FD with a favorable safety profile. ","PeriodicalId":33798,"journal":{"name":"Rossiiskii zhurnal gastroenterologii gepatologii koloproktologii","volume":"151 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-08-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Rossiiskii zhurnal gastroenterologii gepatologii koloproktologii","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.22416/1382-4376-2022-32-3-40-51","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The aim of the study was to evaluate the efficacy and safety of Kolofort® (a complex medicine containing technologically processed forms of antibodies to S-100 protein, tumor necrosis factor-α and histamine) in the management of functional dyspepsia (FD) in outpatient clinical practice.Methods: Outpatients (N = 309) at the age of 18–45 in whom FD was diagnosed according to the Rome IV criteria were enrolled in a multicenter, double-blind, placebo-controlled, randomized clinical trial. Patients were randomized in two groups receiving Kolofort® or placebo 2 tablets tid for 8 weeks. The primary endpoint of the study was a change in the FD symptoms severity score according to the Gastrointestinal symptom score (GIS) at week 8. ITT and [PP] analysis were performed.Results: at week 8 the reduction in GIS sum score was observed in Kolofort® group and placebo group (by 7.2 ± 3.3 [7.2 ± 3.4] and 6.3 ± 4.6 [6.2 ± 4.5], respectively, p = 0.041 [0.039]). The proportion of cases with GIS score reduction by ≥4 was 88,1 % [88.6 %] and 79.1 % [79.6 %] in Kolofort® group and placebo group, respectively (p = 0.046 [p = 0.051]). None of the patients in Kolofort® group had progression of FD symptoms or required additional therapy. There were 29 adverse events (AEs) recorded in 25 patients including 16 cases in 13 (8.6 %) patients in Kolofort® group and 13 AEs in 12 (7.6 %) patients in placebo group.Conclusion: the clinical trial demonstrates the positive effect of Kolofort® in FD with a favorable safety profile. 
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
技术处理的肿瘤坏死因子-α、脑特异性S-100蛋白和组胺多克隆亲和纯化抗体治疗功能性消化不良:多中心、随机、双盲、安慰剂对照试验的结果
该研究的目的是评估Kolofort®(一种含有S-100蛋白、肿瘤坏死因子-α和组胺抗体的复合药物)在门诊临床实践中治疗功能性消化不良(FD)的疗效和安全性。方法:采用多中心、双盲、安慰剂对照、随机临床试验,选取年龄在18-45岁、经Rome IV标准诊断为FD的门诊患者309例。患者被随机分为两组,每天服用Kolofort®或安慰剂2片,持续8周。研究的主要终点是根据胃肠道症状评分(GIS)在第8周FD症状严重程度评分的变化。进行ITT和[PP]分析。结果:在第8周,Kolofort®组和安慰剂组的GIS总分分别下降了7.2±3.3[7.2±3.4]和6.3±4.6[6.2±4.5],p = 0.041[0.039])。Kolofort®组和安慰剂组GIS评分降低≥4分的比例分别为88%、1%[88.6%]和79.1% [79.6%](p = 0.046 [p = 0.051])。Kolofort®组患者无FD症状进展或需要额外治疗。25例患者共发生29例不良事件(ae),其中Kolofort®组13例16例(8.6%),安慰剂组12例13例(7.6%)。结论:临床试验表明Kolofort®在FD中的积极作用,具有良好的安全性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
44
审稿时长
8 weeks
期刊最新文献
Modern Possibilities of Using Lactulose in Clinical Practice A Case of Medullary Carcinoma of the Jejunum Combined with the Intestinal Lymphangiectasia Accompanied by the Malabsorption Syndrome Esophageal Lichen Planus as a Cause of Dysphagia: Literature Review and Clinical Observation Practical Aspects of Clinical Manifestations, Pathogenesis and Therapy of Alcoholic Liver Disease and Non-alcoholic Fatty Liver Disease: Expert Opinion Immediate Results of Colonic Flat Epithelial Neoplasms Removal Using Diathermic Snare Endoscopic Mucosal Resection and Mucosectomy Combined with Dissection in the Submucosal Layer: Comparative Assessment
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1