Collection of Taxes from Ultimate Beneficiaries: Russian Regulatory Model

Pub Date : 2021-05-10 DOI:10.1515/ael-2020-0149
I. Tsindeliani, M. Egorova, E. Vasilyeva, Inessa V. Bit-Shabo, V. Kikavets
{"title":"Collection of Taxes from Ultimate Beneficiaries: Russian Regulatory Model","authors":"I. Tsindeliani, M. Egorova, E. Vasilyeva, Inessa V. Bit-Shabo, V. Kikavets","doi":"10.1515/ael-2020-0149","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract The problem of aggressive tax optimization and the related issue of liability of individuals who are the ultimate beneficiaries of company’s tax liabilities are becoming more and more regulatory complex. The purpose of the study, implemented using the system-functional method, is to theoretically substantiate the ways to overcome the problems that arise when collecting taxes in favor of the state from the ultimate beneficiaries. The results of the study indicate that the corporate structure cannot fully protect the beneficiary of an enterprise from property liability for committing a tax offense. The study proposes a strategy to improve the efficiency of collection of receivables from real beneficiaries. The results of this study are of great practical importance for the subjects of legislative initiative and practitioners in the field of tax legal relations. If under the conditions of the Russian legal system until 2016 it was practically impossible to prove the informal connection of a company with an actual beneficiary, then as a result of the adoption of Federal Law No. 401-FZ of November 30, 2016, the courts began to take into account any evidence that could become an argument for bringing the ultimate beneficiary to justice. This in turn led to the emergence of controversial issues. For this reason, the authors highlighted the problems arising as a result of law enforcement.","PeriodicalId":0,"journal":{"name":"","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2021-05-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"7","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1515/ael-2020-0149","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 7

Abstract

Abstract The problem of aggressive tax optimization and the related issue of liability of individuals who are the ultimate beneficiaries of company’s tax liabilities are becoming more and more regulatory complex. The purpose of the study, implemented using the system-functional method, is to theoretically substantiate the ways to overcome the problems that arise when collecting taxes in favor of the state from the ultimate beneficiaries. The results of the study indicate that the corporate structure cannot fully protect the beneficiary of an enterprise from property liability for committing a tax offense. The study proposes a strategy to improve the efficiency of collection of receivables from real beneficiaries. The results of this study are of great practical importance for the subjects of legislative initiative and practitioners in the field of tax legal relations. If under the conditions of the Russian legal system until 2016 it was practically impossible to prove the informal connection of a company with an actual beneficiary, then as a result of the adoption of Federal Law No. 401-FZ of November 30, 2016, the courts began to take into account any evidence that could become an argument for bringing the ultimate beneficiary to justice. This in turn led to the emergence of controversial issues. For this reason, the authors highlighted the problems arising as a result of law enforcement.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
向最终受益人征税:俄罗斯监管模式
摘要积极税收优化问题及其相关的个人责任问题,作为公司纳税义务的最终受益人,在监管上变得越来越复杂。使用系统功能方法实施的这项研究的目的是从理论上证实克服从最终受益者那里征收有利于国家的税收时出现的问题的方法。研究结果表明,法人结构不能充分保护企业税收犯罪的受益人不承担财产责任。该研究提出了一项战略,以提高向实际受益人收取应收款的效率。本文的研究结果对税收法律关系领域的立法主体和实践者具有重要的现实意义。如果在俄罗斯法律制度的条件下,直到2016年,几乎不可能证明公司与实际受益人的非正式联系,那么由于2016年11月30日第401-FZ号联邦法的通过,法院开始考虑任何可能成为将最终受益人绳之以法的证据。这反过来又导致了有争议的问题的出现。因此,作者强调了由于执法而产生的问题。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1