Evaluación de las asignaturas optativas en modalidad a distancia desde la mirada del estudiantado de la licenciatura de Médico Cirujano

Lilia Macedo de la Concha
{"title":"Evaluación de las asignaturas optativas en modalidad a distancia desde la mirada del estudiantado de la licenciatura de Médico Cirujano","authors":"Lilia Macedo de la Concha","doi":"10.22201/fm.24484865e.2023.66.4s.07","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The educational model of the Open University and Distance Education System (SUAyED) is based on the generation of learning ecologies that consider environments, situations and contexts of activity different from the traditional ones, which offer opportunities to learn. The principles of this model are flexibility, adaptability, innovation, interaction and interactivity, distributed teaching, co-responsibility, continuous evaluation, humanism and sustainability, which are considered in the design of optional subjects in the distance modality (MOLIMOD). The technical and design aspects were evaluated through a questionnaire with a Likert-type scale, applied to students from the first to the fourth year of the Medical Doctor degree (MDD) who took any of these subjects. The results guide us to a positive perception from the students. The systematic evaluation allows constant improvement and shows that the students are satisfied with the design and implementation of MOLIMOD.\nKeywords: Medical education; evaluation; distance modality; optional subjects; didactic design.","PeriodicalId":21295,"journal":{"name":"Revista de la Facultad de Medicina","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-07-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Revista de la Facultad de Medicina","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.22201/fm.24484865e.2023.66.4s.07","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The educational model of the Open University and Distance Education System (SUAyED) is based on the generation of learning ecologies that consider environments, situations and contexts of activity different from the traditional ones, which offer opportunities to learn. The principles of this model are flexibility, adaptability, innovation, interaction and interactivity, distributed teaching, co-responsibility, continuous evaluation, humanism and sustainability, which are considered in the design of optional subjects in the distance modality (MOLIMOD). The technical and design aspects were evaluated through a questionnaire with a Likert-type scale, applied to students from the first to the fourth year of the Medical Doctor degree (MDD) who took any of these subjects. The results guide us to a positive perception from the students. The systematic evaluation allows constant improvement and shows that the students are satisfied with the design and implementation of MOLIMOD. Keywords: Medical education; evaluation; distance modality; optional subjects; didactic design.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
从外科医生学位学生的角度对远程模式下的选修课进行评估
开放大学和远程教育系统(SUAyED)的教育模式是基于学习生态的产生,它考虑了与传统环境不同的环境、情境和活动背景,提供了学习机会。这种模式的原则是灵活性、适应性、创新性、互动性和互动性、分布式教学、共同责任、持续评估、人性化和可持续性,这些原则在远程模式(MOLIMOD)的选修科目设计中得到了充分的考虑。技术和设计方面通过李克特式量表的问卷进行评估,该问卷适用于医学博士学位(MDD)一至四年级的学生,他们选修了这些科目中的任何一门。结果引导我们从学生那里获得积极的看法。通过系统的评价,学生对MOLIMOD的设计和实现感到满意。关键词:医学教育;评估;距离形态;可选的科目;教学设计。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Las obras inacabadas de Rodin Haga su diagnóstico La importancia de evaluar el daño al DNA Craniectomía descompresiva en infarto de arteria cerebral media bilateral asociado a COVID-19. Reporte de caso Enfermedad de Castleman: un enfoque integral a propósito de un reporte de caso
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1