Production Chain Disruptions: Inventory, Preparedness, and Insurance

IF 0.1 4区 工程技术 Q4 ENGINEERING, MANUFACTURING Manufacturing Engineering Pub Date : 2018-02-04 DOI:10.2139/ssrn.2906431
Lingxiu Dong, S. Tang, Brian Tomlin
{"title":"Production Chain Disruptions: Inventory, Preparedness, and Insurance","authors":"Lingxiu Dong, S. Tang, Brian Tomlin","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.2906431","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Disruptions that temporarily interrupt production pose a significant risk for manufacturing firms. To manage this risk, firms can purchase interruption insurance and/or deploy operational measures such as storing inventory or taking preparedness actions that reduce the expected interruption length. In this study, we explore inventory, preparedness, and insurance in a two‐stage production chain that can experience disruptions at either the upstream or downstream stage. We analytically characterize an inventory‐only model and a preparedness‐only model in which the firm uses either inventory or preparedness effort to manage disruption risk, and a joint model in which the firm deploys both operational measures. We identify the relationships between the two operational measures within a stage and across the two stages. We also examine how insurance affects a firm's optimal deployment of and preference between the two operational measures. In addition to providing insights into the interaction of these three risk management measures, our results provide insights into the production chain design. For example, the firm can reduce its disruption risk management cost by allocating more production activity downstream (when possible) and this risk management benefit can, at times, outweigh the possible production cost increase associated with allocating more production downstream.","PeriodicalId":49886,"journal":{"name":"Manufacturing Engineering","volume":"10 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.1000,"publicationDate":"2018-02-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"43","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Manufacturing Engineering","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2906431","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, MANUFACTURING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 43

Abstract

Disruptions that temporarily interrupt production pose a significant risk for manufacturing firms. To manage this risk, firms can purchase interruption insurance and/or deploy operational measures such as storing inventory or taking preparedness actions that reduce the expected interruption length. In this study, we explore inventory, preparedness, and insurance in a two‐stage production chain that can experience disruptions at either the upstream or downstream stage. We analytically characterize an inventory‐only model and a preparedness‐only model in which the firm uses either inventory or preparedness effort to manage disruption risk, and a joint model in which the firm deploys both operational measures. We identify the relationships between the two operational measures within a stage and across the two stages. We also examine how insurance affects a firm's optimal deployment of and preference between the two operational measures. In addition to providing insights into the interaction of these three risk management measures, our results provide insights into the production chain design. For example, the firm can reduce its disruption risk management cost by allocating more production activity downstream (when possible) and this risk management benefit can, at times, outweigh the possible production cost increase associated with allocating more production downstream.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
生产链中断:库存、准备和保险
暂时中断生产的中断对制造企业构成重大风险。为了管理这种风险,公司可以购买中断保险和/或部署操作措施,如存储库存或采取准备行动,以减少预期的中断时间。在本研究中,我们探讨了两阶段生产链中的库存、准备和保险,这两阶段生产链可能在上游或下游阶段经历中断。我们分析地描述了一个纯库存模型和一个纯准备模型,其中公司使用库存或准备工作来管理中断风险,以及一个联合模型,其中公司部署了两种操作措施。我们确定一个阶段内和跨两个阶段的两个操作度量之间的关系。我们还研究了保险如何影响公司对两种操作措施的最佳部署和偏好。除了提供对这三种风险管理措施的相互作用的见解之外,我们的结果还提供了对生产链设计的见解。例如,公司可以通过将更多的生产活动分配到下游(如果可能的话)来降低其中断风险管理成本,并且这种风险管理收益有时可以超过将更多生产分配到下游可能带来的生产成本增加。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Manufacturing Engineering
Manufacturing Engineering 工程技术-工程:制造
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Information not localized
期刊最新文献
Capacity Co-Opetition in Service Clusters with Waiting-area Entertainment Cloud-Kitchens in High-Density Cities: Economies of Scale Through Co-Location Credit Chain and Sectoral Co-movement: A Multi-Region Investigation Approximations for the Lead Time Variance: A Forecasting and Inventory Evaluation Reselling or Agency Selling? Consumer Valuation, Quality Design, and Manufacturers' Competition
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1