Human Helping of Animals: What Motivates It?

Lauren E. Highfill, Mark H. Davis
{"title":"Human Helping of Animals: What Motivates It?","authors":"Lauren E. Highfill, Mark H. Davis","doi":"10.1079/hai.2020.0015","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n While considerable research has been carried out to understand helping offered to other humans, relatively little research has focused specifically on the motivations underlying helping for animals. It is possible that the social psychological helping literature may help shed light on the question of human-animal helping, and may provide some ways to investigate this issue. To evaluate this possibility, we provided participants with a hypothetical situation involving an animal in need of help. Participants were asked to imagine that the situation is happening to them, and then to indicate the likelihood that they would provide the needed help. They were also asked to report on the thoughts and feelings that they would experience in that situation. Our results indicated that the same variables that have been used successfully in understanding the motivations underlying the help we offer to fellow humans (obligation, oneness, empathic concern) also successfully predict helping offered to non-humans. Also consistent with the social psychological research on helping motivations, both egoistic and altruistic motives appear to play a role in the helping decisions regarding animals. Thus, initial evidence suggests that this technique may be a valid way of examining the motivations underlying the helping that humans offer to animals.","PeriodicalId":90845,"journal":{"name":"Human-animal interaction bulletin","volume":"123 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Human-animal interaction bulletin","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1079/hai.2020.0015","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

While considerable research has been carried out to understand helping offered to other humans, relatively little research has focused specifically on the motivations underlying helping for animals. It is possible that the social psychological helping literature may help shed light on the question of human-animal helping, and may provide some ways to investigate this issue. To evaluate this possibility, we provided participants with a hypothetical situation involving an animal in need of help. Participants were asked to imagine that the situation is happening to them, and then to indicate the likelihood that they would provide the needed help. They were also asked to report on the thoughts and feelings that they would experience in that situation. Our results indicated that the same variables that have been used successfully in understanding the motivations underlying the help we offer to fellow humans (obligation, oneness, empathic concern) also successfully predict helping offered to non-humans. Also consistent with the social psychological research on helping motivations, both egoistic and altruistic motives appear to play a role in the helping decisions regarding animals. Thus, initial evidence suggests that this technique may be a valid way of examining the motivations underlying the helping that humans offer to animals.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
人类帮助动物的动机是什么?
虽然有相当多的研究是为了理解人们对他人的帮助,但专门研究帮助动物背后的动机的研究相对较少。这是可能的,社会心理学帮助文献可能有助于阐明人类动物帮助的问题,并可能提供一些方法来调查这个问题。为了评估这种可能性,我们为参与者提供了一个涉及需要帮助的动物的假设情况。参与者被要求想象这种情况发生在他们身上,然后指出他们提供所需帮助的可能性。他们还被要求报告在这种情况下他们会经历的想法和感受。我们的研究结果表明,同样的变量已经被成功地用于理解我们向人类同胞提供帮助的动机(义务、同一性、共情关怀),也成功地预测了我们向非人类提供帮助的动机。与社会心理学对帮助动机的研究一致,利己主义动机和利他主义动机似乎都在动物的帮助决策中发挥作用。因此,初步证据表明,这项技术可能是一种有效的方法,可以研究人类对动物提供帮助的潜在动机。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
The Perception and Effect of Aggressive Dog Breeds on Human Social Interactions Impacts of Dog Ownership and Attachment on Total and Dog-related Physical Activity in Germany Comparing the Effect of Human-Dog Interactions and Progressive Muscle Relaxation on Self-Report and Physiological Measures of Stress Animal Welfare Considerations in Animal-Assisted Interventions The Loss of a Service Dog Through Retirement: Experiences and Impact on Human Partners
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1