Impact of node density and TTL in vehicular delay tolerant networks: performance comparison of different routing protocols

Kevin Bylykbashi, Evjola Spaho, L. Barolli, F. Xhafa
{"title":"Impact of node density and TTL in vehicular delay tolerant networks: performance comparison of different routing protocols","authors":"Kevin Bylykbashi, Evjola Spaho, L. Barolli, F. Xhafa","doi":"10.1504/IJSSC.2017.10010059","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In this work, we evaluate the performance of different routing protocols in vehicular delay tolerant networks (VDTNs). We study the impact of vehicles density and TTL on the network performance. The simulations are conducted with the opportunistic network environment (ONE) simulator. The performance is analysed using delivery probability, overhead ratio, average latency and average number of hops metrics. The simulation results show that the increase of node density improves the network performance. In dense network scenario, the performance of epidemic and maxprop routing protocols is better because the number of opportunistic contacts between nodes increases. For spray and wait, the performance is not improved since it uses a maximum of two hops to deliver bundles. Hence, in dense networks, a bundle may have a significant delay because it can only be delivered when a relay or source node have an opportunistic contact with the destination. The increase of ttl from 30 to 120 min does not improve the performance of three routing protocols in both scenarios. Multiple-copy protocols perform better in terms of delivery probability compared with single-copy protocol. The single-copy protocol uses the highest average number of hops and higher average latency compared with multiple-copy protocols.","PeriodicalId":43931,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Space-Based and Situated Computing","volume":"97 1","pages":"136-144"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"14","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Space-Based and Situated Computing","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1504/IJSSC.2017.10010059","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 14

Abstract

In this work, we evaluate the performance of different routing protocols in vehicular delay tolerant networks (VDTNs). We study the impact of vehicles density and TTL on the network performance. The simulations are conducted with the opportunistic network environment (ONE) simulator. The performance is analysed using delivery probability, overhead ratio, average latency and average number of hops metrics. The simulation results show that the increase of node density improves the network performance. In dense network scenario, the performance of epidemic and maxprop routing protocols is better because the number of opportunistic contacts between nodes increases. For spray and wait, the performance is not improved since it uses a maximum of two hops to deliver bundles. Hence, in dense networks, a bundle may have a significant delay because it can only be delivered when a relay or source node have an opportunistic contact with the destination. The increase of ttl from 30 to 120 min does not improve the performance of three routing protocols in both scenarios. Multiple-copy protocols perform better in terms of delivery probability compared with single-copy protocol. The single-copy protocol uses the highest average number of hops and higher average latency compared with multiple-copy protocols.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
节点密度和TTL对车载容错网络的影响:不同路由协议的性能比较
在这项工作中,我们评估了不同路由协议在车辆容忍延迟网络(VDTNs)中的性能。我们研究了车辆密度和TTL对网络性能的影响。在机会网络环境(ONE)模拟器上进行了仿真。性能分析使用传输概率、开销比、平均延迟和平均跳数指标。仿真结果表明,节点密度的增加提高了网络性能。在密集网络场景下,epidemic和maxprop路由协议的性能较好,因为节点之间的机会接触次数增加。对于喷雾和等待,由于它最多使用两个跃点来交付包,因此性能没有得到改善。因此,在密集的网络中,数据包可能会有很大的延迟,因为它只能在中继或源节点与目标节点有机会接触时才能交付。将ttl从30分钟增加到120分钟,在这两种情况下,并不能提高三种路由协议的性能。在传输概率方面,多副本协议优于单副本协议。与多副本协议相比,单副本协议具有最高的平均跳数和更高的平均时延。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
International Journal of Space-Based and Situated Computing
International Journal of Space-Based and Situated Computing COMPUTER SCIENCE, INFORMATION SYSTEMS-
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
A hierarchical outlier detection method for spare parts transaction A multi-tiered spare parts inventory forecasting system GPS availability prediction based on air-ground collaboration Inventory Optimization based on NSGA-III Algorithm Data privacy and anonymisation of simulated health-care dataset using the ARX open source tool
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1