Modern methods of assessing the viability of the intestinal wall (review)

Amir A. Valiev, R. Hasanov, L. L. Galimova, I. Gataullin
{"title":"Modern methods of assessing the viability of the intestinal wall (review)","authors":"Amir A. Valiev, R. Hasanov, L. L. Galimova, I. Gataullin","doi":"10.33878/2073-7556-2023-22-3-140-148","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"AIM: to highlight modern methods of assessing the viability of the intestinal wall.MATERIALS AND METHODS: the search was made using electronic databases. We explored multiple sources, including, but not limited to, monographs, journal articles, books and websites.RESULTS: despite recent advances in scientific methods and technologies, currently the visual method remains the most popular for assessing the viability of the intestinal wall, which includes parameters such as color of the intestinal wall, peristalsis, and arterial pulsation.CONCLUSION: it would be fair to conclude that such methods as hyperspectral imaging, multimodal coherent tomography provide greater flexibility and details on the intestinal viability. However, further research is needed to determine their value in clinical practice. To the date, the most studied and applied method is fluorescent angiography, which allows to assess the viability of the intestine for most of its length.","PeriodicalId":17840,"journal":{"name":"Koloproktologia","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Koloproktologia","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.33878/2073-7556-2023-22-3-140-148","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

AIM: to highlight modern methods of assessing the viability of the intestinal wall.MATERIALS AND METHODS: the search was made using electronic databases. We explored multiple sources, including, but not limited to, monographs, journal articles, books and websites.RESULTS: despite recent advances in scientific methods and technologies, currently the visual method remains the most popular for assessing the viability of the intestinal wall, which includes parameters such as color of the intestinal wall, peristalsis, and arterial pulsation.CONCLUSION: it would be fair to conclude that such methods as hyperspectral imaging, multimodal coherent tomography provide greater flexibility and details on the intestinal viability. However, further research is needed to determine their value in clinical practice. To the date, the most studied and applied method is fluorescent angiography, which allows to assess the viability of the intestine for most of its length.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
评估肠壁活力的现代方法(综述)
目的:强调评估肠壁活力的现代方法。材料与方法:采用电子数据库进行检索。我们探索了多种来源,包括但不限于专著、期刊文章、书籍和网站。结果:尽管最近科学方法和技术取得了进展,但目前视觉方法仍然是评估肠壁活力最流行的方法,其中包括肠壁颜色、蠕动和动脉脉动等参数。结论:高光谱成像、多模态相干断层扫描等方法可以更灵活、更详细地了解肠道活力。然而,需要进一步的研究来确定其在临床实践中的价值。迄今为止,研究和应用最多的方法是荧光血管造影,它可以评估肠道大部分长度的活力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
In the memory of professor Aleksandr S. Ermolov (90th birth remembrance) COMMENTS Vadim V. Polovinkin, Artem V. Volkov, Maria S. Yakovenko, Anna I. Demina The difficulties of differential diagnosis of Crohn’s disease and metastatic breast cancer (case report) COMMENTS Igor V. Matveev, Mikhail A. Danilov, Alexander V. Klimashevich, Arif K. Aallakhverdiev, Alexander V. Maksimenko, Anastasia M. Valieva Ileocecal resection with extended lymphadenectomy for localized cecal cancer Predictors of adverse outcomes of steroids in patients with severe ulcerative colitis (systematic review and meta-analyses) Tubular duplication of the sigmoid colon: clinical case
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1