Pedagogy for interprofessional education – what do we know and how can we evaluate it?

Jane Payler PhD, Edgar Meyer PhD, Debra Humphris PhD
{"title":"Pedagogy for interprofessional education – what do we know and how can we evaluate it?","authors":"Jane Payler PhD,&nbsp;Edgar Meyer PhD,&nbsp;Debra Humphris PhD","doi":"10.1111/j.1473-6861.2008.00175.x","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Locating this paper in the wider context of evaluations of interprofessional education (IPE), this review explores the knowledge base of the pedagogic processes for interprofessional education. The article concentrates on evidence for professionals in health, social care and education, the challenges involved in IPE and the challenges involved in evaluating IPE. Although IPE is widely discussed, detailed descriptions of the underlying pedagogy are scarce. The paper aims to provide a more detailed account of the approaches to learning and teaching in IPE. A literature review was undertaken to collate information on approaches to IPE, concentrating primarily on identifying descriptions of pedagogical features for pre- and post-registration training and continuing professional development. The review identifies a number of pedagogical models and educational processes underpinning IPE. Although the findings indicate that social-constructivist approaches, small group working and problem-based learning are often referred to, evidence of pedagogical models used in IPE and ways of developing evidence of their effectiveness and usefulness are still limited. Based on the discussion of some challenges that face IPE in general and the evaluation of IPE in particular, the authors propose the need for a theoretical framework that conceptualizes learning by taking into account the wider context of learning and the pedagogy that is employed during IPE. Reference is made to a framework which would respond to evidence in the literature that evaluations of IPE need to take into consideration different, complimentary sources of data that go beyond traditional, often positivist evaluations.</p>","PeriodicalId":100874,"journal":{"name":"Learning in Health and Social Care","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2008-05-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1111/j.1473-6861.2008.00175.x","citationCount":"44","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Learning in Health and Social Care","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/j.1473-6861.2008.00175.x","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 44

Abstract

Locating this paper in the wider context of evaluations of interprofessional education (IPE), this review explores the knowledge base of the pedagogic processes for interprofessional education. The article concentrates on evidence for professionals in health, social care and education, the challenges involved in IPE and the challenges involved in evaluating IPE. Although IPE is widely discussed, detailed descriptions of the underlying pedagogy are scarce. The paper aims to provide a more detailed account of the approaches to learning and teaching in IPE. A literature review was undertaken to collate information on approaches to IPE, concentrating primarily on identifying descriptions of pedagogical features for pre- and post-registration training and continuing professional development. The review identifies a number of pedagogical models and educational processes underpinning IPE. Although the findings indicate that social-constructivist approaches, small group working and problem-based learning are often referred to, evidence of pedagogical models used in IPE and ways of developing evidence of their effectiveness and usefulness are still limited. Based on the discussion of some challenges that face IPE in general and the evaluation of IPE in particular, the authors propose the need for a theoretical framework that conceptualizes learning by taking into account the wider context of learning and the pedagogy that is employed during IPE. Reference is made to a framework which would respond to evidence in the literature that evaluations of IPE need to take into consideration different, complimentary sources of data that go beyond traditional, often positivist evaluations.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
跨专业教育的教学法——我们知道什么?我们如何评价它?
本文立足于跨专业教育评估的大背景下,探讨了跨专业教育教学过程的知识基础。这篇文章的重点是为卫生、社会关怀和教育领域的专业人士提供的证据、国际政治经济学所面临的挑战以及评估国际政治经济学所面临的挑战。尽管IPE被广泛讨论,但对其基本教学法的详细描述却很少。本文旨在更详细地介绍国际政治经济学的学习和教学方法。进行了文献审查,以整理关于国际政治经济学方法的资料,主要集中于确定注册前和注册后培训和持续专业发展的教学特点的描述。该综述确定了支撑国际政治经济学的一些教学模式和教育过程。尽管研究结果表明,社会建构主义方法、小组工作和基于问题的学习经常被提及,但国际政治经济学中使用的教学模式的证据以及证明其有效性和有用性的证据仍然有限。基于对国际政治经济学普遍面临的一些挑战的讨论,特别是对国际政治经济学的评估,作者提出需要一个理论框架,通过考虑更广泛的学习背景和国际政治经济学所采用的教学法来概念化学习。参考了一个框架,该框架将回应文献中的证据,即国际政治经济学的评估需要考虑不同的、互补的数据来源,这些数据来源超出了传统的、通常是实证主义的评估。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Experiential placements and scaffolding for reflection A qualitative evaluation of an interprofessional learning project Becoming a lecturer in nurse education: the work-place learning of clinical experts as newcomers Lost in translation: barriers to learning in health professional clinical education Undergraduate socialization in medical education: ideals of professional physicians’ practice
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1