{"title":"CENTRAL MACULAR THICKNESS REDUCTION AFTER INTRAVITREAL INJECTION OF BEVACIZUMAB COMPARED TO INTRAVITREAL KETOROLAC IN NAIVE DIABETIC MACULAR EDEMA","authors":"S. Supanji, A. N. Agni","doi":"10.35479/ijretina.2022.vol005.iss002.203","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Introduction: Diabetic macular edema (DME) is a debilitating complication of the diabetic eye. Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor (VEGF) was found to be responsible for this disease entity, and anti-VEGF remains the main treatment of DME. Inflammatory processes occur in diabetic eye, with some researchers postulates the role of them in the making of DME. This study’s objective is to search for anti-VEGF alternative using Non-Steroid Anti-Inflammatory Drugs (NSAID), ketorolac tromethamine. \nMethods: We conducted a double blind, randomized clinical trial in DME patients using intravitreal injection of bevacizumab and ketorolac. Central macular thickness (CMT) was assessed pre-treatment and one-month post-treatment. Best Corrected Visual Acuity (BCVA) and Intraocular Pressure (IOP) were also assessed. Wilcoxon tests were performed to evaluate changes in CMT, visual acuity, and IOP. \nResult: We enrolled 50 treatment-naïve DME patients from March 2020 to March 2021. Twenty-five patients were allocated for each group. There is a statistically significant difference in CMT at one-month follow-up between the two groups (p:0.001) and a markedly reduced CMT between the groups (p:0.001), with the reduction higher in bevacizumab group. BCVA changes significantly in bevacizumab group (p:0.01), but there is no statistically significant difference between the two groups (p:0.07). There’s a marked difference of IOP in 1 hour after injection in both groups, with higher transient IOP elevation in ketorolac group (p:0.02), but there is no marked difference in one-month follow-up (p:>0.05). The perceived pain right after intravitreal injection is not different between bevacizumab and ketorolac group. \nConclusion: Intravitreal injection of ketorolac found to be inferior compared to bevacizumab in reducing CMT of DME. Meanwhile, there’s no differences in visual acuity, intraocular pressure (one-month follow-up) and pain after injection between two groups.","PeriodicalId":33128,"journal":{"name":"IJRETINA International Journal of Retina","volume":"29 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-09-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"IJRETINA International Journal of Retina","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.35479/ijretina.2022.vol005.iss002.203","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Introduction: Diabetic macular edema (DME) is a debilitating complication of the diabetic eye. Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor (VEGF) was found to be responsible for this disease entity, and anti-VEGF remains the main treatment of DME. Inflammatory processes occur in diabetic eye, with some researchers postulates the role of them in the making of DME. This study’s objective is to search for anti-VEGF alternative using Non-Steroid Anti-Inflammatory Drugs (NSAID), ketorolac tromethamine.
Methods: We conducted a double blind, randomized clinical trial in DME patients using intravitreal injection of bevacizumab and ketorolac. Central macular thickness (CMT) was assessed pre-treatment and one-month post-treatment. Best Corrected Visual Acuity (BCVA) and Intraocular Pressure (IOP) were also assessed. Wilcoxon tests were performed to evaluate changes in CMT, visual acuity, and IOP.
Result: We enrolled 50 treatment-naïve DME patients from March 2020 to March 2021. Twenty-five patients were allocated for each group. There is a statistically significant difference in CMT at one-month follow-up between the two groups (p:0.001) and a markedly reduced CMT between the groups (p:0.001), with the reduction higher in bevacizumab group. BCVA changes significantly in bevacizumab group (p:0.01), but there is no statistically significant difference between the two groups (p:0.07). There’s a marked difference of IOP in 1 hour after injection in both groups, with higher transient IOP elevation in ketorolac group (p:0.02), but there is no marked difference in one-month follow-up (p:>0.05). The perceived pain right after intravitreal injection is not different between bevacizumab and ketorolac group.
Conclusion: Intravitreal injection of ketorolac found to be inferior compared to bevacizumab in reducing CMT of DME. Meanwhile, there’s no differences in visual acuity, intraocular pressure (one-month follow-up) and pain after injection between two groups.
简介:糖尿病性黄斑水肿(DME)是糖尿病眼的一种衰弱性并发症。血管内皮生长因子(VEGF)被发现与这种疾病实体有关,抗VEGF仍然是DME的主要治疗方法。炎症过程发生在糖尿病眼,一些研究人员推测它们在二甲醚制造中的作用。本研究的目的是寻找非甾体抗炎药(NSAID),酮咯酸tromethamine的抗vegf替代品。方法:我们在双盲随机临床试验中对二甲醚患者进行玻璃体内注射贝伐单抗和酮咯酸。分别在治疗前和治疗后1个月评估黄斑中央厚度(CMT)。同时评估最佳矫正视力(BCVA)和眼压(IOP)。采用Wilcoxon试验评估CMT、视力和IOP的变化。结果:我们从2020年3月至2021年3月招募了50例treatment-naïve DME患者。每组25名患者。随访1个月后,两组间CMT差异有统计学意义(p:0.001),两组间CMT显著降低(p:0.001),贝伐单抗组降低幅度更高。贝伐单抗组BCVA变化显著(p:0.01),但两组间差异无统计学意义(p:0.07)。两组患者注射后1 h IOP差异有统计学意义,酮洛酸组瞬时IOP升高较高(p:0.02), 1个月随访无统计学意义(p:>0.05)。贝伐单抗组和酮咯酸组在玻璃体内注射后即刻感知疼痛无差异。结论:与贝伐单抗相比,玻璃体内注射酮咯酸降低二甲醚CMT的效果较差。同时,两组患者的视力、眼压(随访1个月)、注射后疼痛均无差异。