Of Subjunctives and Apologetics: A Response to Judith Wolfe

IF 0.4 4区 哲学 0 RELIGION International Journal of Public Theology Pub Date : 2022-10-18 DOI:10.1163/15697320-20220052
Stephen R. Holmes
{"title":"Of Subjunctives and Apologetics: A Response to Judith Wolfe","authors":"Stephen R. Holmes","doi":"10.1163/15697320-20220052","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"I would like to thank my colleague Judith for her profound and expansive lecture, that I have benefitted greatly from engaging with. She starts from a definition of theology, to give an account of the place of theology within the university, emphasizing both the role of theology in establishing the possibility of academic engagement with the world through its metaphysical claims, and the unitive function of theology, using the example of interdisciplinary engagement with psychology. She moves on to narrate the difference that makes to the central functions of the university, discovery and dwelling, and finally, using eschatology as an example, to explore how this is all relevant to wider society. Judith’s references to philosophy doing at least some of the same work as theology indicate an awareness that some – within the modern Western university, perhaps most – hearers will instinctively engage her claims as if they were made in the subjunctive mood. If – but only if – the core claims of theology happen to be true, then it does bring the benefits and implications she identifies. If instead the Christian doctrine of creation is not true, for example, then the claimed metaphysical grounding of the possibility of academic engagement becomes at best of no worth, and perhaps even genuinely harmful to the mission of the university, in providing misleading hope. There is perhaps a stronger argument that is implied, but undeveloped, in Judith’s lecture – that the possibility of the university as commonly conceived depends on conditions that theology alone can guarantee. Even if developed, this would still unfortunately fail: the historical entanglement of the Western university with Christendom means that all such an argument would prove, if it were prosecuted, is that our loss of shared faith should lead to the abandonment, or at least transformation, of our idea of a university – a conclusion that many recent jeremiads lamenting the state of the contemporary university might be seen to support.","PeriodicalId":43324,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Public Theology","volume":"271 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.4000,"publicationDate":"2022-10-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Public Theology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1163/15697320-20220052","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"哲学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"RELIGION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

I would like to thank my colleague Judith for her profound and expansive lecture, that I have benefitted greatly from engaging with. She starts from a definition of theology, to give an account of the place of theology within the university, emphasizing both the role of theology in establishing the possibility of academic engagement with the world through its metaphysical claims, and the unitive function of theology, using the example of interdisciplinary engagement with psychology. She moves on to narrate the difference that makes to the central functions of the university, discovery and dwelling, and finally, using eschatology as an example, to explore how this is all relevant to wider society. Judith’s references to philosophy doing at least some of the same work as theology indicate an awareness that some – within the modern Western university, perhaps most – hearers will instinctively engage her claims as if they were made in the subjunctive mood. If – but only if – the core claims of theology happen to be true, then it does bring the benefits and implications she identifies. If instead the Christian doctrine of creation is not true, for example, then the claimed metaphysical grounding of the possibility of academic engagement becomes at best of no worth, and perhaps even genuinely harmful to the mission of the university, in providing misleading hope. There is perhaps a stronger argument that is implied, but undeveloped, in Judith’s lecture – that the possibility of the university as commonly conceived depends on conditions that theology alone can guarantee. Even if developed, this would still unfortunately fail: the historical entanglement of the Western university with Christendom means that all such an argument would prove, if it were prosecuted, is that our loss of shared faith should lead to the abandonment, or at least transformation, of our idea of a university – a conclusion that many recent jeremiads lamenting the state of the contemporary university might be seen to support.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
《虚拟语气与护教学:对朱迪思·沃尔夫的回应》
我要感谢我的同事朱迪思,她的演讲深刻而广泛,我从参与中受益匪浅。她从神学的定义开始,阐述了神学在大学中的地位,强调了神学在通过形而上学的主张建立与世界学术接触的可能性方面的作用,以及神学的统一功能,以跨学科与心理学的接触为例。她接着叙述了大学的中心功能,发现和居住的差异,最后,以末世论为例,探讨了这些与更广泛的社会的关系。朱迪思对哲学的引用至少和神学做了一些相同的工作,这表明她意识到一些人——在现代西方大学里,也许是大多数——听众会本能地接受她的主张,就好像它们是在虚拟语气中提出的。如果——但只有当——神学的核心主张恰好是正确的,那么它确实带来了她所指出的好处和影响。例如,如果基督教的创世论不是真的,那么所谓的学术参与可能性的形而上学基础就变得毫无价值,甚至可能真正损害大学的使命,因为它提供了误导性的希望。在朱迪思的演讲中,也许有一个隐含的更有力的论点,但没有得到充分的发展——大学的可能性通常是由神学本身可以保证的条件决定的。即使发展起来,这仍然会不幸地失败:西方大学与基督教世界的历史纠葛意味着,所有这样的论点,如果被起诉,将证明,我们失去了共同的信仰,应该导致放弃,或者至少转变,我们对大学的看法——这一结论,最近许多哀叹当代大学状况的人可能会被视为支持。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.70
自引率
50.00%
发文量
35
期刊最新文献
On Critiquing Christian Nationalism: Two Recent Books on the Perils of Christian Nationalism Intersex and Medical Health: a Construction of a Public Health Theology Paradigm for Sexual Polymorphism in Indonesia Beyond the Shadows: a Public Theology of Disability Inclusion Triangulated Challenges to Democracy: a Critical Voice of Public Theology to Counter Fear and Escalating Polarization in Indonesia Binding Citizenship as a Bridge between Communities and Institutions: Dialogues between Christian Social Ethics, Political Philosophy and Social Sciences
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1