Resisting the Present: Biopower in the Face of the Event (Some Notes on Monstrous Lives)

4区 社会学 Q2 Arts and Humanities CR-THE NEW CENTENNIAL REVIEW Pub Date : 2020-02-07 DOI:10.14321/crnewcentrevi.19.3.0099
Thomas Clément Mercier
{"title":"Resisting the Present: Biopower in the Face of the Event (Some Notes on Monstrous Lives)","authors":"Thomas Clément Mercier","doi":"10.14321/crnewcentrevi.19.3.0099","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In its hegemonic definition, biopolitical governmentality is characterised by a seemingly infinite capacity of expansion, susceptible to colonise the landscape and timescape of the living present in the name of capitalistic productivity. The main trait of biopower is its normative, legal and political plasticity, allowing it to reappropriate critiques and resistances by appealing to bioethical efficacy and biological accuracy. Under these circumstances, how can we invent rebellious forms-of-life and alternative temporalities escaping biopolitical normativity? In this essay, I interrogate the theoretical presuppositions of biopolitical rationality. I provide a deconstruction of the conceptual and temporal structures upholding the notion of biopolitics, in view of laying the ground for new forms of resistance. The articulation between life and power has a long philosophical history, which has been largely ignored by social theorists and political thinkers using biopolitics as an interpretative model. I re-inscribe this model within the tradition of critical materialism, by articulating Foucault’s ‘critical ontology’ to recent philosophical works on biological plasticity (Malabou). In these discourses, the logic of biopower depends on a representation of life What imparts itself in the promise must therefore go beyond all forms of transcendental subjectivity and their politico-economic institutions, it must go beyond capital and the labor which it determines, and from this exceedence it must transform all its figures in advance, transform them by promising them and shifting them into the “trans” of every form. From its very inception, it must be beyond everything posited in any way, a monster at the limit of appearance, of visibility and representability. It must be, however so gently, an ex-positing.","PeriodicalId":45935,"journal":{"name":"CR-THE NEW CENTENNIAL REVIEW","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-02-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"6","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"CR-THE NEW CENTENNIAL REVIEW","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.14321/crnewcentrevi.19.3.0099","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Arts and Humanities","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 6

Abstract

In its hegemonic definition, biopolitical governmentality is characterised by a seemingly infinite capacity of expansion, susceptible to colonise the landscape and timescape of the living present in the name of capitalistic productivity. The main trait of biopower is its normative, legal and political plasticity, allowing it to reappropriate critiques and resistances by appealing to bioethical efficacy and biological accuracy. Under these circumstances, how can we invent rebellious forms-of-life and alternative temporalities escaping biopolitical normativity? In this essay, I interrogate the theoretical presuppositions of biopolitical rationality. I provide a deconstruction of the conceptual and temporal structures upholding the notion of biopolitics, in view of laying the ground for new forms of resistance. The articulation between life and power has a long philosophical history, which has been largely ignored by social theorists and political thinkers using biopolitics as an interpretative model. I re-inscribe this model within the tradition of critical materialism, by articulating Foucault’s ‘critical ontology’ to recent philosophical works on biological plasticity (Malabou). In these discourses, the logic of biopower depends on a representation of life What imparts itself in the promise must therefore go beyond all forms of transcendental subjectivity and their politico-economic institutions, it must go beyond capital and the labor which it determines, and from this exceedence it must transform all its figures in advance, transform them by promising them and shifting them into the “trans” of every form. From its very inception, it must be beyond everything posited in any way, a monster at the limit of appearance, of visibility and representability. It must be, however so gently, an ex-positing.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
抵制现在:面对事件的生物力量(关于怪物生命的一些注释)
在其霸权定义中,生物政治治理的特点是看似无限的扩张能力,容易以资本主义生产力的名义殖民景观和时间逃逸。生物权力的主要特征是其规范、法律和政治的可塑性,允许它通过呼吁生物伦理的有效性和生物学的准确性来重新调整批评和抵制。在这种情况下,我们如何发明叛逆的生活形式和替代的暂时性,以逃避生物政治规范?在这篇文章中,我质疑生物政治理性的理论前提。为了为新的抵抗形式奠定基础,我解构了支持生命政治概念的概念和时间结构。生命与权力之间的关系有着悠久的哲学历史,但这一点在很大程度上被社会理论家和政治思想家所忽视,他们将生命政治作为一种解释模式。我通过将福柯的“批判本体论”与最近关于生物可塑性的哲学著作(Malabou)结合,在批判唯物主义的传统中重新诠释了这个模型。在这些话语中,生命权力的逻辑依赖于生命的表现,因此,在承诺中赋予自己的东西必须超越一切形式的先验主体性及其政治经济制度,它必须超越资本和它所决定的劳动,并且从这种超越中,它必须提前改变它的所有形象,通过承诺它们并将它们转变为每一种形式的“trans”来改变它们。从一开始,它就必须超越以任何方式设定的一切,是一个处于表象、可见性和可表征性极限的怪物。无论多么温柔,这一定是一种回归。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CR-THE NEW CENTENNIAL REVIEW
CR-THE NEW CENTENNIAL REVIEW HUMANITIES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY-
CiteScore
0.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊介绍: The New Centennial Review is devoted to comparative studies of the Americas that suggest possibilities for a different future. Centennial Review is published three times a year under the editorship of Scott Michaelsen (Department of English, Michigan State University) and David E. Johnson (Department of Comparative Literature, SUNY at Buffalo). The journal recognizes that the language of the Americas is translation, and that questions of translation, dialogue, and border crossings (linguistic, cultural, national, and the like) are necessary for rethinking the foundations and limits of the Americas.
期刊最新文献
Lose Your Father Archiving Black Diasporas “Liberty or Death!” Respite. Quiet. A House of Dreams “Breaking and Entering the Colonial Archive”
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1