New field, geochemical, and petrographic evidence from the Bon Accord nickel body: Contamination of a komatiite by deep mantle or meteorite source?

M. Huber, F. Roelofse, C. Koeberl, M. Tredoux
{"title":"New field, geochemical, and petrographic evidence from the Bon Accord nickel body: Contamination of a komatiite by deep mantle or meteorite source?","authors":"M. Huber, F. Roelofse, C. Koeberl, M. Tredoux","doi":"10.1130/2021.2550(13)","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n The Bon Accord nickel body has been known since the 1920s to contain rocks with up to 50 wt% NiO. Numerous nickel-rich minerals have been described from this deposit. However, none of these minerals contains significant Cu or S, making the deposit chemically distinct from all other known Ni deposits. The origin of the Bon Accord nickel body is highly contentious, with previous studies suggesting three major possible origins: (1) a hydrothermal origin; (2) an Fe-Ni meteorite that fell into and was altered by an active ultramafic lava flow; or (3) a deep mantle plume that contained a fragment of nickel-rich material. Here, we present new field, petrograph ic, and geochemical data in an attempt to constrain the origin of this enigmatic body. Based on our fieldwork, there are at least two distinct Ni-rich bodies. Based on the trace-element chemistry, the protolith of the body was a komatiite, likely belonging to the Weltevreden Formation. Because the Ni end member of olivine (liebenbergite) is present in the form of euhedral crystals, this mineral most likely crystallized from a Ni-rich melt. The redistribution of the nickel appears to be due to hydrothermal activity that occurred during the intrusion of the Stentor pluton. Consistent with previous studies, we find that the komatiitic affinity of the host rocks, the stratigraphic controls on the deposit, and the regional distribution of Ni-rich material are inconsistent with a meteorite origin; instead, a komatiite plume sampling a Ni-rich portion of the mantle is currently the best explanation for the origin of the Ni-rich material.","PeriodicalId":17949,"journal":{"name":"Large Meteorite Impacts and Planetary Evolution VI","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-06-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Large Meteorite Impacts and Planetary Evolution VI","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1130/2021.2550(13)","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The Bon Accord nickel body has been known since the 1920s to contain rocks with up to 50 wt% NiO. Numerous nickel-rich minerals have been described from this deposit. However, none of these minerals contains significant Cu or S, making the deposit chemically distinct from all other known Ni deposits. The origin of the Bon Accord nickel body is highly contentious, with previous studies suggesting three major possible origins: (1) a hydrothermal origin; (2) an Fe-Ni meteorite that fell into and was altered by an active ultramafic lava flow; or (3) a deep mantle plume that contained a fragment of nickel-rich material. Here, we present new field, petrograph ic, and geochemical data in an attempt to constrain the origin of this enigmatic body. Based on our fieldwork, there are at least two distinct Ni-rich bodies. Based on the trace-element chemistry, the protolith of the body was a komatiite, likely belonging to the Weltevreden Formation. Because the Ni end member of olivine (liebenbergite) is present in the form of euhedral crystals, this mineral most likely crystallized from a Ni-rich melt. The redistribution of the nickel appears to be due to hydrothermal activity that occurred during the intrusion of the Stentor pluton. Consistent with previous studies, we find that the komatiitic affinity of the host rocks, the stratigraphic controls on the deposit, and the regional distribution of Ni-rich material are inconsistent with a meteorite origin; instead, a komatiite plume sampling a Ni-rich portion of the mantle is currently the best explanation for the origin of the Ni-rich material.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
来自Bon Accord镍体的新领域、地球化学和岩石学证据:深地幔或陨石源对科马铁矿的污染?
自20世纪20年代以来,Bon Accord镍体就被发现含有高达50%的NiO。从这个矿床中发现了许多富镍矿物。然而,这些矿物中没有含有大量的铜或S,这使得该矿床在化学上与所有其他已知的镍矿床不同。Bon Accord镍矿的起源争议很大,以前的研究提出了三种可能的起源:(1)热液起源;(2)铁镍陨石落入一次活跃的超镁铁质熔岩流中并被其蚀变;或者(3)深层地幔柱中含有富含镍物质的碎片。在这里,我们提出了新的野外、岩石学和地球化学数据,试图限制这个神秘天体的起源。根据我们的野外工作,至少有两个不同的富镍体。根据微量元素化学分析,尸体的原岩是一种科马铁矿,可能属于韦尔特弗雷登组。由于橄榄石(列本辉石)的镍端以自面体晶体的形式存在,这种矿物很可能是由富镍熔体结晶而成的。镍的重新分布似乎是由于在Stentor岩体侵入期间发生的热液活动。与前人研究结果一致,寄主岩的科马长岩亲和性、地层对矿床的控制作用以及富镍物质的区域分布与陨石成因不一致;相反,对地幔中富含镍的部分进行采样的科玛蒂岩柱是目前对富含镍物质起源的最好解释。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
The Cleanskin impact structure, Northern Territory and Queensland, Australia: A reconnaissance study Terrestrial and extraterrestrial chemical components of early Archean impact spherule layers from Fairview Gold Mine, northern Barberton greenstone belt, South Africa The first microseconds of a hypervelocity impact Micro–X-ray fluorescence (µXRF) analysis of proximal impactites: High-resolution element mapping, digital image analysis, and quantifications Genesis of the mafic granophyre of the Vredefort impact structure (South Africa): Implications of new geochemical and Se and Re-Os isotope data
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1