Automating the Repair of Faulty Logical Theories

Xue Li
{"title":"Automating the Repair of Faulty Logical Theories","authors":"Xue Li","doi":"10.1017/bsl.2021.43","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract This thesis aims to develop a domain-independent system for repairing faulty Datalog-like theories by combining three existing techniques: abduction, belief revision, and conceptual change. Accordingly, the proposed system is named the ABC repair system (ABC). Given an observed assertion and a current theory, abduction adds axioms, which explain that observation by making the corresponding assertion derivable from the expanded theory. Belief revision incorporates a new piece of information which conflicts with the input theory by deleting old axioms. Conceptual change uses the reformation algorithm for blocking unwanted proofs or unblocking wanted proofs. The former two techniques change an axiom as a whole, while reformation changes the language in which the theory is written. These three techniques are complementary. But they have not previously been combined into one system. We are working on aligning these three techniques in ABC, which is capable of repairing logical theories with better result than each individual technique alone. In addition, ABC extends abduction and belief revision to operate on preconditions: the former deletes preconditions from rules, and the latter adds preconditions to rules. Datalog is used as the underlying logic of theories in this thesis, but the proposed system has the potential to be adapted to theories in other logics. Abstract prepared by Xue Li by taking directly from the thesis. E-mail: xuerr.lee@gmail.com","PeriodicalId":22265,"journal":{"name":"The Bulletin of Symbolic Logic","volume":"259 1","pages":"530 - 530"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-07-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Bulletin of Symbolic Logic","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1017/bsl.2021.43","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

Abstract This thesis aims to develop a domain-independent system for repairing faulty Datalog-like theories by combining three existing techniques: abduction, belief revision, and conceptual change. Accordingly, the proposed system is named the ABC repair system (ABC). Given an observed assertion and a current theory, abduction adds axioms, which explain that observation by making the corresponding assertion derivable from the expanded theory. Belief revision incorporates a new piece of information which conflicts with the input theory by deleting old axioms. Conceptual change uses the reformation algorithm for blocking unwanted proofs or unblocking wanted proofs. The former two techniques change an axiom as a whole, while reformation changes the language in which the theory is written. These three techniques are complementary. But they have not previously been combined into one system. We are working on aligning these three techniques in ABC, which is capable of repairing logical theories with better result than each individual technique alone. In addition, ABC extends abduction and belief revision to operate on preconditions: the former deletes preconditions from rules, and the latter adds preconditions to rules. Datalog is used as the underlying logic of theories in this thesis, but the proposed system has the potential to be adapted to theories in other logics. Abstract prepared by Xue Li by taking directly from the thesis. E-mail: xuerr.lee@gmail.com
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
自动修复错误的逻辑理论
摘要本文旨在结合现有的溯因、信念修正和概念改变三种技术,开发一个领域独立的修复错误的类datalog理论的系统。因此,该系统被命名为ABC修复系统(ABC)。给定观察到的断言和当前的理论,溯因法添加公理,通过使相应的断言可以从扩展的理论中推导出来来解释观察。信念修正通过删除旧的公理来引入与输入理论相冲突的新信息。概念变更使用改造算法来阻止不需要的证明或解除阻止想要的证明。前两种方法从整体上改变了一个公理,而改革则改变了书写理论的语言。这三种技术是互补的。但它们以前从未被合并成一个系统。我们正在努力将这三种技术在ABC中进行对齐,它能够比单独使用每种技术修复逻辑理论的效果更好。此外,ABC将溯因法和信念修正法扩展到对前提条件进行操作:前者从规则中删除前提条件,后者在规则中添加前提条件。本文使用数据作为理论的基础逻辑,但所提出的系统有可能适用于其他逻辑中的理论。摘要由薛力直接从论文中摘取。电子邮件:xuerr.lee@gmail.com
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
POUR-EL’S LANDSCAPE CATEGORICAL QUANTIFICATION POINCARÉ-WEYL’S PREDICATIVITY: GOING BEYOND A TOPOLOGICAL APPROACH TO UNDEFINABILITY IN ALGEBRAIC EXTENSIONS OF John MacFarlane, Philosophical Logic: A Contemporary Introduction, Routledge Contemporary Introductions to Philosophy, Routledge, New York, and London, 2021, xx + 238 pp.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1