{"title":"Effect of algae Ecklonia maxima extract (Kelpak SL) on yields of common wheat, durum wheat and spelt wheat","authors":"G. Szumiło, L. Rachoń, B. Krochmal-Marczak","doi":"10.24326/2019.1.1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The 3-year experiment was concerned with the response of spring forms of common wheat (Triticum aestivum L. subsp. aestivum), durum wheat (Triticum durum Desf.) and spelt wheat (Triticum aestivum subsp. spelta L. em. Thell.) to the foliar application of a plant growth stimulant (extract from marine algae Ecklonia maxima), with the commercial name of Kelpak SL (GS), as compared to control treatment (C). The following parameters were analysed: yield of grain, yield components (number of ears, weight of 1000 kernels, number and weight of kernels per ear) and physical indicators of grain quality (test weight, uniformity and vitreosity of grain). The study showed that the level of yielding and the yield components were related primarily with the wheat genotype, but they depended also on the agro-climatic conditions and on the algae extract and control experimental treatments. The application of algae extract, compared to the control, caused a significant increase in the yields of the spring wheat species under study, on average by 7.0%. Canopy spraying with algae extract had a favourable effect on the number of ears, on he number and weight of kernels per ear, but it had no effect on the weight of 1000 kernels. The grain quality of durum wheat, spelt wheat and common wheat was affected more strongly by the weather conditions in the successive years of the study and by the genotype than by the foliar application of algae extract. The spelt genotypes were characterised by lower yields and lower grain quality than common wheat and the durum wheat genotypes.","PeriodicalId":100343,"journal":{"name":"Crop Science, Soil Science, Agronomy News","volume":"3 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-04-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Crop Science, Soil Science, Agronomy News","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.24326/2019.1.1","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2
Abstract
The 3-year experiment was concerned with the response of spring forms of common wheat (Triticum aestivum L. subsp. aestivum), durum wheat (Triticum durum Desf.) and spelt wheat (Triticum aestivum subsp. spelta L. em. Thell.) to the foliar application of a plant growth stimulant (extract from marine algae Ecklonia maxima), with the commercial name of Kelpak SL (GS), as compared to control treatment (C). The following parameters were analysed: yield of grain, yield components (number of ears, weight of 1000 kernels, number and weight of kernels per ear) and physical indicators of grain quality (test weight, uniformity and vitreosity of grain). The study showed that the level of yielding and the yield components were related primarily with the wheat genotype, but they depended also on the agro-climatic conditions and on the algae extract and control experimental treatments. The application of algae extract, compared to the control, caused a significant increase in the yields of the spring wheat species under study, on average by 7.0%. Canopy spraying with algae extract had a favourable effect on the number of ears, on he number and weight of kernels per ear, but it had no effect on the weight of 1000 kernels. The grain quality of durum wheat, spelt wheat and common wheat was affected more strongly by the weather conditions in the successive years of the study and by the genotype than by the foliar application of algae extract. The spelt genotypes were characterised by lower yields and lower grain quality than common wheat and the durum wheat genotypes.
本试验为期3年,研究了普通小麦(Triticum aestivum L. subsp.)春型对土壤水分的响应。硬粒小麦(Triticum durum Desf.)和拼写小麦(Triticum aestivum subsp.)。(elta L. em. Thell.)与对照处理(C)相比,叶面施用植物生长刺激剂(商业名称为Kelpak SL (GS)的海洋藻类Ecklonia maxima提取物)。分析了以下参数:籽粒产量、产量成分(穗数、1000粒重、每穗粒数和重量)和籽粒质量的物理指标(籽粒试验重量、均匀性和玻璃体)。研究表明,产量水平和产量构成主要与小麦基因型有关,但也与农业气候条件、藻类提取物和对照试验处理有关。与对照相比,施用海藻提取物可显著提高所研究春小麦品种的产量,平均提高7.0%。冠层喷施海藻提取物对穗数、穗粒数和穗粒重均有显著影响,但对千粒重无显著影响。连年气候条件和基因型对硬粒小麦、粗粒小麦和普通小麦籽粒品质的影响大于叶面施用海藻提取物的影响。与普通小麦和硬粒小麦基因型相比,斯佩尔特小麦基因型的产量和籽粒品质都较低。