J. Solà, M. Cortés, David Perruchoud, B. De Marco, M. Lobo, C. Pellaton, G. Wuerzner, N. Fisher, Jay A. Shah
{"title":"Guidance for the Interpretation of Continual Cuffless Blood Pressure Data for the Diagnosis and Management of Hypertension","authors":"J. Solà, M. Cortés, David Perruchoud, B. De Marco, M. Lobo, C. Pellaton, G. Wuerzner, N. Fisher, Jay A. Shah","doi":"10.3389/fmedt.2022.899143","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Hypertension remains the leading risk factor for death worldwide. Despite its prevalence, success of blood pressure (BP) management efforts remains elusive, and part of the difficulty lies in the tool still used to diagnose, measure, and treat hypertension: the sphygmomanometer introduced by Samuel Siegfried Karl von Basch in 1867. In recent years, there has been an explosion of devices attempting to provide estimates of BP without a cuff, overcoming many limitations of cuff-based BP monitors. Unfortunately, the differences in underlying technologies between traditional BP cuffs and newer cuffless devices, as well as hesitancy of changing a well-implemented standard, still generate understandable skepticism about and reluctance to adopt cuffless BP monitors in clinical practice. This guidance document aims to navigate the scientific and medical communities through the types of cuffless devices and present examples of robust BP data collection which are better representations of a person's true BP. It highlights the differences between data collected by cuffless and traditional cuff-based devices and provides an initial framework of interpretation of the new cuffless datasets using, as an example, a CE-marked continual cuffless BP device (Aktiia BP Monitor, Aktiia, Switzerland). Demonstration of novel BP metrics, which have the potential to change the paradigm of hypertension diagnosis and treatment, are now possible for the first time with cuffless BP monitors that provide continual readings over long periods. Widespread adoption of continual cuffless BP monitors in healthcare will require a collaborative and thoughtful process, acknowledging that the transition from a legacy to a novel medical technology will be slow. Finally, this guidance concludes with a call to action to international scientific and expert associations to include cuffless BP monitors in original scientific research and in future versions of guidelines and standards.","PeriodicalId":94015,"journal":{"name":"Frontiers in medical technology","volume":"36 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2022-05-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"9","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Frontiers in medical technology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3389/fmedt.2022.899143","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, BIOMEDICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 9
Abstract
Hypertension remains the leading risk factor for death worldwide. Despite its prevalence, success of blood pressure (BP) management efforts remains elusive, and part of the difficulty lies in the tool still used to diagnose, measure, and treat hypertension: the sphygmomanometer introduced by Samuel Siegfried Karl von Basch in 1867. In recent years, there has been an explosion of devices attempting to provide estimates of BP without a cuff, overcoming many limitations of cuff-based BP monitors. Unfortunately, the differences in underlying technologies between traditional BP cuffs and newer cuffless devices, as well as hesitancy of changing a well-implemented standard, still generate understandable skepticism about and reluctance to adopt cuffless BP monitors in clinical practice. This guidance document aims to navigate the scientific and medical communities through the types of cuffless devices and present examples of robust BP data collection which are better representations of a person's true BP. It highlights the differences between data collected by cuffless and traditional cuff-based devices and provides an initial framework of interpretation of the new cuffless datasets using, as an example, a CE-marked continual cuffless BP device (Aktiia BP Monitor, Aktiia, Switzerland). Demonstration of novel BP metrics, which have the potential to change the paradigm of hypertension diagnosis and treatment, are now possible for the first time with cuffless BP monitors that provide continual readings over long periods. Widespread adoption of continual cuffless BP monitors in healthcare will require a collaborative and thoughtful process, acknowledging that the transition from a legacy to a novel medical technology will be slow. Finally, this guidance concludes with a call to action to international scientific and expert associations to include cuffless BP monitors in original scientific research and in future versions of guidelines and standards.
高血压仍然是世界范围内死亡的主要危险因素。尽管血压(BP)普遍存在,但成功的血压管理工作仍然难以捉摸,部分困难在于仍然用于诊断、测量和治疗高血压的工具:1867年由塞缪尔·齐格弗里德·卡尔·冯·巴什(Samuel Siegfried Karl von Basch)引入的血压计。近年来,出现了大量尝试提供不带袖带的血压估计的设备,克服了基于袖带的血压监测仪的许多局限性。不幸的是,传统的血压袖带和新型无袖带设备之间的基础技术差异,以及改变一个实施良好的标准的犹豫,仍然产生了可以理解的怀疑,不愿意在临床实践中采用无袖带血压监测仪。本指导文件旨在通过无袖带设备的类型引导科学界和医学界,并提供可靠的血压数据收集示例,这些数据更好地代表了一个人的真实血压。它强调了无袖带和传统袖带设备收集的数据之间的差异,并提供了一个解释新无袖带数据集的初步框架,以ce标记的连续无袖带BP设备为例(Aktiia BP Monitor, Aktiia, Switzerland)。有可能改变高血压诊断和治疗模式的新型血压指标的演示,现在首次有可能使用无套管的血压监测仪,提供长时间的连续读数。在医疗保健领域广泛采用连续无套管BP监测仪将需要一个协作和深思熟虑的过程,承认从传统到新型医疗技术的过渡将是缓慢的。最后,本指南呼吁国际科学和专家协会采取行动,将无袖BP监测仪纳入原始科学研究和未来版本的指南和标准中。