Controlling for Chance Agreement in the Validation of Medical Expert Systems with No Gold Standard: PNEUMON-IA and RENOIR Revisited

M. Martı́n-Baranera , J.J. Sancho, F. Sanz
{"title":"Controlling for Chance Agreement in the Validation of Medical Expert Systems with No Gold Standard: PNEUMON-IA and RENOIR Revisited","authors":"M. Martı́n-Baranera ,&nbsp;J.J. Sancho,&nbsp;F. Sanz","doi":"10.1006/cbmr.2000.1552","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>In the validation of medical expert systems, agreement among different human specialists on a random sample of cases may be taken as a substitute to a missing gold standard. Distance measures between pairs of experts, extensively described in previous studies, do not take into account the influence of chance-expected agreement. A weighted kappa index, with three different weighting schemes, is proposed as an alternative to be applied in the general situation of <em>N</em> cases assessed by <em>E</em> experts about <em>K</em> possible diagnoses, each of them qualified with one of <em>G</em> ordinal categories. A hierarchical cluster analysis, applied to the kappa matrices generated, allows for the classification of the expert system among clinical specialists, providing a relative assessment of its diagnostic ability. The above methodology is applied to the validation of two medical expert systems, PNEUMON-IA and RENOIR.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":75733,"journal":{"name":"Computers and biomedical research, an international journal","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2000-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1006/cbmr.2000.1552","citationCount":"6","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Computers and biomedical research, an international journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0010480900915520","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 6

Abstract

In the validation of medical expert systems, agreement among different human specialists on a random sample of cases may be taken as a substitute to a missing gold standard. Distance measures between pairs of experts, extensively described in previous studies, do not take into account the influence of chance-expected agreement. A weighted kappa index, with three different weighting schemes, is proposed as an alternative to be applied in the general situation of N cases assessed by E experts about K possible diagnoses, each of them qualified with one of G ordinal categories. A hierarchical cluster analysis, applied to the kappa matrices generated, allows for the classification of the expert system among clinical specialists, providing a relative assessment of its diagnostic ability. The above methodology is applied to the validation of two medical expert systems, PNEUMON-IA and RENOIR.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
在没有金标准的医疗专家系统验证中控制机会一致性:肺炎和雷诺阿的重新审视
在医学专家系统的验证中,不同的人类专家对随机病例样本的一致意见可以作为缺失的金标准的替代品。在以前的研究中广泛描述的专家对之间的距离度量没有考虑到偶然性-预期一致性的影响。提出了一种加权kappa指数,采用三种不同的加权方案,作为一种替代方案,应用于E位专家对N例的K种可能诊断进行评估的一般情况下,每个病例都符合G个有序类别中的一个。应用于生成的kappa矩阵的分层聚类分析允许在临床专家之间对专家系统进行分类,提供其诊断能力的相对评估。上述方法应用于两个医学专家系统PNEUMON-IA和RENOIR的验证。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Evolutionary partial differential equations for biomedical image processing ANNOUNCEMENT EDITORIAL EDITORIAL Controlled Auxotonic Twitch in Papillary Muscle: A New Computer-Based Control Approach
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1