How Many People Live in Politically Partisan Online News Echo Chambers in Different Countries?

R. Fletcher, Craig T. Robertson, R. Nielsen
{"title":"How Many People Live in Politically Partisan Online News Echo Chambers in Different Countries?","authors":"R. Fletcher, Craig T. Robertson, R. Nielsen","doi":"10.51685/jqd.2021.020","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Concern over online news echo chambers has been a consistent theme in recent debates on how people get news and information. Yet, we lack a basic descriptive understanding of how many people occupy bounded online news spaces in different countries. Using online survey data from seven countries we find that (i) politically partisan left-right online news echo chambers are real, but only a minority of approximately 5% of internet news users inhabit them, (ii) in every country covered, more people consume no online news at all than occupy partisan online echo chambers, and (iii) except for the US, decisions over the inclusion or exclusion of particular news outlets make little difference to echo chamber estimates. Differences within and between media systems mean we should be very cautious about direct comparisons between different echo chambers, but underlying patterns of audience overlap, and the continued popularity of mainstream outlets, often preclude the formation of large partisan echo chambers.","PeriodicalId":93587,"journal":{"name":"Journal of quantitative description: digital media","volume":"463 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"20","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of quantitative description: digital media","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.51685/jqd.2021.020","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 20

Abstract

Concern over online news echo chambers has been a consistent theme in recent debates on how people get news and information. Yet, we lack a basic descriptive understanding of how many people occupy bounded online news spaces in different countries. Using online survey data from seven countries we find that (i) politically partisan left-right online news echo chambers are real, but only a minority of approximately 5% of internet news users inhabit them, (ii) in every country covered, more people consume no online news at all than occupy partisan online echo chambers, and (iii) except for the US, decisions over the inclusion or exclusion of particular news outlets make little difference to echo chamber estimates. Differences within and between media systems mean we should be very cautious about direct comparisons between different echo chambers, but underlying patterns of audience overlap, and the continued popularity of mainstream outlets, often preclude the formation of large partisan echo chambers.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
不同国家有多少人生活在政治党派网络新闻回音室?
在最近关于人们如何获取新闻和信息的辩论中,对在线新闻回音室的担忧一直是一个主题。然而,我们对不同国家有多少人占据有限的在线新闻空间缺乏基本的描述性理解。使用来自七个国家的在线调查数据,我们发现(i)政治党派左右的在线新闻回声室是真实的,但只有大约5%的互联网新闻用户居住在其中,(ii)在每个覆盖的国家中,根本不消费在线新闻的人比占据党派在线回声室的人更多,以及(iii)除了美国,关于包含或排除特定新闻媒体的决定对回声室的估计几乎没有影响。媒体系统内部和之间的差异意味着我们应该非常谨慎地直接比较不同的回音室,但潜在的受众重叠模式,以及主流媒体的持续流行,往往排除了大型党派回音室的形成。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
#Asylum: How Syrian Refugees Engage with Online Information Who Does(n't) Target You? A Dataset for The Study of Online Radicalization Through Incel Forum Archives Detecting Misinformation: Identifying False News Spread by Political Leaders in the Global South @Who? Investigating Possible Errors in Studies Linking Survey and Twitter Data
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1